Rohit Chauhan
24 July 2013 at 15:19
Dear Sir/Ma'am
I need your Valuable help in the case in the message.
I want to know the provisions applicable in the case, any decided case laws and guidelines/instructions and provisions for preparing the documents for both the parties to the case.
IN THE MATTER OF:
SH. RAMCHANDRESHWAR RAMANUJAM RAJINDER
VERSUS
M/S JHINGAROOO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.
M/s JHINGAROOO Industries Pvt. Ltd. (the Company) is a company incorporated in India having its Registered office at New Delhi. The Company is engaged in the manufacturing of Tyres and other rubber products and have its production units in State of Haryana and also State of Uttar Pradesh.
The company recorded a peak annual turnover of Rs 13500 Lacks in 2008‐ 09 and net worth at Rs 5000 Lacks. To cope up with competition from overseas players such as low cost supplies from China M/s Jhingarooo took large secured loans for up gradation of its plant and machinery from
various scheduled banks in India however due to stiff competition the company continued to incur loses so much so that it suffered huge losses in the financial year 2011‐ 2012 and reported its worst
turnover of just Rs 1350 Lacks and its net worth dipped to 2495 Lacks. The company in the tough times failed to pay its debts a consequently one of its unsecured creditor approached the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi for winding up of the company under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The company also realising the fact that it may not be able to stand the times ahead,
approached the Hon’ble High Court of the Delhi for its winding up against the will of its share holder Sh. Ramchandreshwar Ramanujam Rajinder citing that he has no say in the functioning of the company since he only holds one share of the company. Sh. Ramchandreshwar Ramanujam
Rajinder decided to file an Application on the ground that the company petition for winding up is not maintainable in view of the provisions of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act,
1985 and the company ought to have filed for rehabilitation of the company in terms of the provisions of the said act. In the meantime on the basis of the media reports appeared in leading news papers the Board took suo moto note of the sickness of the company and order inquiry into the sickness of the company and appointed an operating agency on 31.12.2012.
That on the other hand the company bench of the Hon’ble High Court after finally hearing the matter on 23.01.2013 came to a conclusion that there is infact no scope for the revival of the company and ordered for the winding up of the company in accordance with the provisions of the
Companies Act, 1956.
Aggrieved by the said order of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi Sh. Ramchandreshwar Ramanujam Rajinder, preferred an appeal against the said order.
Ashwin Goswami
30 May 2013 at 14:38
Sir I had applied for admission (2013) in CCMB course in M S University Vadodara Gujarat. During application I had written caste category as SEBC.As written by M S University admission commettie, SEBC candidate must have to submit Non-creamy Layer Certificate at the time of admission. my problem is that I am not eligible for Non creamy Layer certificate due to father higher income.so can admn. committee consider me as open candidate or in case of failure of non availability of NON creamy layer certificate what is the constitutional rule.
Requesting for urgent reply sir
Thanking you
With regards
Avani Goswami
S.S.RAM PRASATH
09 November 2012 at 17:20
Dear sir,
I joined the LL.B course and completed the same in this year 2012 june.Now same age restriction problem which became an obstacle to me for enrollment Tamil nadu bar council.
Tamil nadu bar council now not enrolling the 2009-2012 batch LL.B graduates(who are all above 35 years).The reason is 2009 the bar council of India send a circular(order) to all state bar councils and law colleges Regarding the age restriction.But same was challenged before hon`ble high court of andhra predesh. the High court stayed the order.Till now the stay is in force.The bar council of India filed a transfer petition in supreme court which pending before supreme court
govt of andhra pradesh order fallows
Age limits to applicants for seeking Admission vide G.O.Ms.No.32 dt : 18.03.09.
a) 5 - year Law Degree - Maximum age is twenty years in case of general category and twenty two years in case of SCs & STs.
b) 3 - year Law Degree - Maximum age is thirty years in case of general category and thirty five years in case of SCs & STs.
Note: Age limits mentioned above are under challenge in Hon’ble High court of A.P and Supreme Court in W.P.No.6691/09, 7610/09 and transfer petition (civil) nos 857-866 of 2009 in Supreme Court. Interim directions are awarded by the court relaxing the age limits. Admissions into the law courses shall be subject to the outcome of the pending cases.
The Tamil Nadu bar council reply is only state bar council will fallow the bar council of India. Only we will enroll if all India bar council permits.
Kindly advise me how can we make appeal to all india bar council in this regard.
Thanks&Best Regards,
s m alim
17 September 2012 at 18:05
sir mai pg kar rha tha jise break kardia tha or job mai agaya pg mai stipend bhi milta tha bond bhi bhra tha mujhe chutti nahi mil saki 3 saal se phle job se islie join nahi kar saka par university k rule k hisab se 6 saal ma complete kar sakta hu or join na karne ki wja se audit ki wja se recovery letter mere department aae recovery k par mujhe dubara join karna tha islie delay karta rha. ab leave milgai hai or applicatin pg ki underprocess hai time lag rha hai. par department wale recovery karna chahte hai mai kuch din k lie recovery par stay chahta hu bger kisi par case hue k kuch time mil jae mujhe agr admission nhi hua to mai recovery ko tayyar hu.
aloktyagi
17 July 2012 at 01:43
can any 1 please tell me that whether or not d board conducting the exam for the recruitement of group c post can remove/not apply the minimum qualifying marks as mentioned in d relevent recruitement rules ...as in notification they hav'nt mentioned d minimum qualifying marks.....and the final list prepared shows the cut off lower den d minimum qualifying marks prescribed in d relevant recruitement rules.....will be really thankful to u
in notification dere was no minimum qualifying marks criteria.......but in recruitement rules it was 40 marks.....and d candidates were selected by getting marks less den 40 also.....so is dis act permissiable under law ????....
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
regular NIS diploma in sports and Distance MBA in soorts
Respected sir,
I want to ask that following 2 courses can be done at the same time?
1) 1year regular NIS diploma in sports from patiala or 1year regular b.ped degree from B.U university
2)distance MBA in sports management.