Ashok
16 December 2009 at 18:25
Except Chartered Accountant, who is a person authorised by the State Government under subsection (4) of section 12D? What is the qualification required? Where to apply?
mahendrakumar
16 December 2009 at 15:40
can i plead at consumer court on behalf of my major son who is a student?
i am not an advocate. if am permitted to appear on behalf of my son,should produce an authorisation letter or power of attorney or any similar documents?
please advice.
during the past one months association with a dignified forum like lawyersclubindia,i have learned quite a lot from you people.
thanks for all the guidance rendered to me.
Bharath Bhushan
16 December 2009 at 14:00
Dear Sir
I got a message from Coca-Cola Company UK Stating that my mobile No has won 250,000 GBP
and for telegrapic wire transfer of funds they are asking us to pay 420 pounds as Legalization Fee.
Suggest what to do.
Regards
Bharath Bhushan
Anonymous
16 December 2009 at 01:31
I have a flexi home loan and the bank never tend to bring the rate down when the market rate comes lower. Every time I question them, they ask for a "retention fee" to bring the interest down. I would like to understand what flexible rate of interest means here and what can I do legally under such cases where the bank does not bring the loan rate down.
R.Manivasagan
15 December 2009 at 20:39
Sir, Can any one help with regard to the Government Orders (GO') relating to the Panjami lands. It's most urgent
george
15 December 2009 at 17:07
Sir
A sale deed was registrered by fraud .Then a notice was given keeping the possession for rescinding the sale.then the buyer came for compromise ,and forced the seller to sign an agreement on a plain paper agreeing that there was dispute in connection with the deed and now the buyer is inclined not to go to further legal proceedings.the agreement was signed by both buyer and seller.
now can we clam the original deed as per the notice stands rescinded.because the buyer has accepted he has received the notice.and the voidable contract became void in so far as he has accepted there was dispute.
also,for alteration of a contract the original deed stands dischrged.
and whether the subsequent unregistered agreement is valid as per law to validate the original deed in as much as the revocation notice is complete.
sushil bhatt
15 December 2009 at 11:37
Dear All,
Can I hv some citation or judgements on the Application u/s 16 & 14 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996, which has been allowed.
Sushil Bhatt
Vishal jain
15 December 2009 at 11:33
Hello,
I have filed a divorce petition against her. For which, she has given the application for maintenance under Section 24 HMA, which is as follows the main points are:-
1. That the petitioner is running his business in the name of M/s.************ at *******(address) and earning more then Rs. 1,00,000/- per month.
2. That the applicant is a housewife and does not earn anything being a domestic lady and is residing along with her parents thus needs at least Rs. 20,000/- to support her.
3. That to grant Rs. 22,000/- as litigation Expenses.
Some briefs facts are:-
1. I don't file Income tax return as I don't have this much earnings
2. I have taken a salary certificate from the employer(shop owner) for Rs.4000/- per month to prove my earnings
3. the girl has not attached any document/annexures to support her statement from which she can prove that I am in business and earning in lakhs (as claimed by her).
4.She is B.sc graduate, which she has not disclosed in her application. Means she has not come in the court with clean hands. Whereas, I can prove that she is B.sc graduate as I a documentry prove.
5. Now she is doing LLB final year for which she has paid Rs 60,000 fee.
6. Before marriage she was a working lady and earning around 7,000/- pm. (for this she has given in written in Income Tax Department also). I know all this but that is off-records.
7. At the time of Bail proceedings, I have given FDR for Rs.3,00,000/- as per the directions of high Court. In that order also the High court has advised her not to encash the FDR so that she can have regular income as maintainance.
Vishal jain
15 December 2009 at 11:31
Hello,
I have filed a divorce petition against her. For which, she has given the application for maintenance under Section 24 HMA, which is as follows the main points are:-
1. That the petitioner is running his business in the name of M/s.************ at *******(address) and earning more then Rs. 1,00,000/- per month.
4. That the applicant is a housewife and does not earn anything being a domestic lady and is residing along with her parents thus needs at least Rs. 20,000/- to support her.
5. That to grant Rs. 22,000/- as litigation Expenses.
Some briefs facts are:-
1. I don't file Income tax return as I don't have this much earnings
2. I have taken a salary certificate from the employer(shop owner) for Rs.4000/- per month to prove my earnings
3. the girl has not attached any document/annexures to support her statement from which she can prove that I am in business and earning in lakhs (as claimed by her).
4.She is B.sc graduate, which she has not disclosed in her application. Means she has not come in the court with clean hands. Whereas, I can prove that she is B.sc graduate as I a documentry prove.
5. Now she is doing LLB final year for which she has paid Rs 60,000 fee.
6. Before marriage she was a working lady and earning around 7,000/- pm.(for this she has given in written in Income Tax Department also). I know all this but that is off-records.
7. At the time of Bail proceedings, I have given FDR for Rs.3,00,000/- as per the directions of high Court. In that order also the High court has advised her not to encash the FDR so that she can have regular income as maintainance.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Bombay Public Trusts Act
Background: Every trustee has to keep regular accounts of the trust which have to be audited annually by Chartered Accountants or persons authorised under the Act. A Chartered Accountant can audit accounts of any public trust but the persons authorised under the Act are permitted to audit accounts only of public trusts having a gross annual income of Rs. 3,000 or less.
Query:
Who are the persons authorised under the Act? What is their qualification? Where they needs to be registered?