manu
06 March 2009 at 18:54
if any coopratvive bank is merged in multi state co op. bank - what is effect on pending disputes u/s. 91 and proceeding u/s.101 of maharastra co-op. socities act,1960.
(in maharashtra)
H. Mujtaba
06 March 2009 at 17:21
Suit for perfecting the titile by Adverse Possession is filed against 5 defendants. Summons issued to defendants 3 and 4 was returned with an endorsement that the said defendatns have died even prior to the institution of the suit.
What is the remedy in such circumstances to the plaintiff, either to invoke order 22 rule 4 or Orer 1 Rule 10 Read with section 153 of C.P.C to bring the legal representatives of the deceased defendants on record
satyen gadhvi
06 March 2009 at 10:07
Government officers requests citizens to witness the proceedings for affixture of notices or forfeiture of property and asks to sign panchnama narrating that the notice was affixed in their presence or the property was vacated and sealed in their presence. Is it mandatory for citizen or duty of citizen under act to sign the panchnama? what Govt. officer can do , if any person denies to become witness or panch?
satyen gadhvi
06 March 2009 at 10:07
Government officers requests citizens to witness the proceedings for affixture of notices or forfeiture of property and asks to sign panchnama narrating that the notice was affixed in their presence or the property was vacated and sealed in their presence. Is it mandatory for citizen or duty of citizen under act to sign the panchnama? what Govt. officer can do , if any person denies to become witness or panch?
venkat reddy
06 March 2009 at 07:48
A(JD1) has obtained loan from a bank B(JD2) abd C(JD3) stood as guaranters B is the father of the A who is died C has taken VRS but the court passed an order to recover the amount from the retirement benefits of the C could lower court had the ample powers to pass an order such type.
Rekha.....
05 March 2009 at 20:09
Hello Respected Members
Nice meeting u
Our Problem how to argue? V r Plaintiff
Matter is of Money recovery Suit in the court of Asst.Civil Judge (I)
The Plaintiff filed his affidavit with all 25 documents and 10 documents r zerox(coz these original documents were sent to the defendants at the time of correspondence)The Hon’ble Judge asked to submit the application for the documents are to be exhibited. Now said application is fix for hearing. The Defendants may take objections.
So please spare sm time for us n dictate sm points of argument.
gaurav
05 March 2009 at 11:07
Hello,
I have to file a case in consumer court against a company for misrepresentaion of MRP of product . My problem is that i am in haryana and company's office is only in chennai. I can not go to chennai for fighting the case . Please give me relevant solution .Further more i can not afford a lawyer since the case is having dispute of Rs 5000 only
Y V Vishweshwar Rao
05 March 2009 at 09:54
Specific performance such - agreement for ten acre land out of it 5 acres sold to the nominee of the Agreement holder-no dispute for that part of five acres .The remaining part five acres performance is due and disputed by the Vendor .The Suit Value is the Value of the remaining 5-00 acres in the specif performance suit . Is it required to pay Court fee on the entire Sale agreement value of ten acres
imthiyaz
05 March 2009 at 09:32
Urgent
Sir, Our muslim partition suit is pending in Final decree proceedings with 11 decree holders as sharers, AS often the case in muslim partiion suits,there are large number of legal heirs of 11 decree holders,
Some of the defendants and plaintiffs have colluded with each other without the knowledge and authorisation of some of legal heirs of decree holders and have executed a panchayati fariqhat with notary signature for some of the decree schedule properties and has applied for Khata change to their names on the basis of this paper without the knowledge of honorable court in which final decree proceedings is pending.
These fraud persons are running a case in the Tahsildar court for khata change for which proceedings are adjourned for orders in next hearing, I attended the previous hearing that Tahsildar is arguing even though the case is pending in final decree procedings for the schedule properties for which khata change has been applied, Tahsildar is ready to change the khata, he may be under some influence, I have filed an petition in taluk office and has taken an acknoledgement that khata for these properties must not be chnaged as still the case is pending.
under what section of cpc we can get stay or an injection or direction from court to the respective taluk offices to stay the process of any khata change of decree schedule properties untill the final decree proceedings is completed.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Property Tax
The Municipal Corporation collected the Property Tax-VLT with four years retrospective effective date and during this period also Property Tax is paid and VLT need not be paid , but paid due to pressure from Municipal Officers and to get No due Certificates under compulsion, for Registration of the documents .
The Tax payment and its related matters comes under Consumer Disputes ???????
For recovery of excess paid amount/Tax consumer dispute is maintainable or a civil suit to be filed .