LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

N.K.Assumi   12 September 2008 at 06:59

Registered documents:

If a registered documents dully registered before the Registration officer is it a conclusive proof?

chiranjib mukherjee   11 September 2008 at 20:11

LEGAL PRACTITIONERS' ACT,1879

Whether the 'Legal Practitioners' Act has been repealed? If so, when?

G. ARAVINTHAN   11 September 2008 at 16:52

Interest in a money suit

To what extent the plaintiff can claim interest from the defendant in a suit for recovery of money?

G. ARAVINTHAN   11 September 2008 at 09:54

Appointment of Advocate Commissioner in an Appeal

Is an application for appointment of Advocate commissioner in an Appeal of a suit maintainable?

R.Manivasagan   10 September 2008 at 21:54

Provident Fund- can be attached

Whether the Provident Fund and the Graduaty can be attched by the Civil court order in Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure

N.K.Assumi   10 September 2008 at 13:15

section 2 (vi) CLPA 1986.

Does the word occupier in section 2(vi) of the Child labour prohibition act 1986, embraces the employes' agents and contractors also?

N.K.Assumi   10 September 2008 at 12:02

What is Child labour?

can any one of you define what is Child labour? It may be a labour in agrarian,industril oe service sector:

N.K.Assumi   10 September 2008 at 07:14

Mareva Injunction:

What is Mareva Injunction?

N.K.Assumi   09 September 2008 at 11:00

Refund of court fees:

if the Plaintiff lost the case after depositing huge amount of court fees and does not want to pursued his case further, can he get back the fees deposited in the court by way of Court fees? What is the procedure? Can the court refused to refund?

J K Agrawal   09 September 2008 at 06:29

S 163A Motor Vehicle Act

When a Claim is filed under MOTOR Vehicle Act, in case of death of boy of 27 year, not married, The claimants are parents aged about 50. The multiplier applicable is as per age of parents as it calculates less in comparison of calculation as per age of deceased. But if the case is filed UNDER SECTION 163A of MV Act age of DECEASED only is taken into consideration and no fact beyond schedule II is considered. Will anybody give me citation on this particular point? I have come to know that MFA 282/2002 decided on 20/11/2007 by the Honable Kerala High Court titled as I Damodaran v M K Valsala is direct citation on this point. Will any body help me to furnish hard or soft copy of the Judgment?