I am transport company owner.i have insured the goods at the Tim of transport travel.but the goods were damaged due to rain.the goods owner have received me for damages certificate regarding the claim for insurance company.the goods owner also insured the goods at the Tim for booking. He received the claim payment for insurance company.the insurance company field us our company recovery suit for behalf of goods owner to subrogation letter through.can I give the payment for insurance company. Yah my insurance company pay the claim for at tim I goods were insured to travel tim.
I filed my OA in CAT 8 years back for unauthorized termination, today CAT dismiss my OA by saying that this OA doesn't come under the jurisdictions of CAT, and ask me to file it Highcourt or Apeal .Pls guide me How to do it.
I have doubt that,we have tpa act in which lease is provided and we have rent act also. So under which act i have to file case for eviction .
Because rent act applies on urban area what if property not falls in urban area .and on other hand if property falls under urban area but not fulflling requirement like in rent act provided that rent act not applies in premises which is new .
Kindly reslove this query in detailed manner.
Is West Bengal Fire Services Act applicable on Fire Insurance Policies and If yes then what legal provisions says this?
I m the ex secretary of my society and i am paying my regular maintenance bill on time till date.
My society charging me Rs 6 lakhs as penalty in my maintenance bill from 2012 for which Dy registrar also written letter to our society in 2013 that they cannot charge such amount as penalty in my maintenance bill now they send me letter to pay that other due charges which is pending in my maintenance bill or they will approach Dy registrar for recovery of other due charge u/s MCD act 154 b 29.
I just want to know that charging penalty of Rs 6 lakhs in maintenance bill without any clarification comes u/s MCS act 154b 29 for recovery before Dy registrar
Respected expert,
In a summary suit a Conditional leave to defend order is passed by the city civil court which is challanged before high court by a writ petition. Now the defendant, my client found that some facts produced by the plaintiff are false and some facts are deliberately suppressed by the plaintiff in the summary suit. My writ petition is pending before the high court for admission. Under the circumstances can I make an application before city civil court for recall of order u/s. 44 of evidence Act and/or section 151 of CPC. (What I understood is that review petition is not maintainable as the writ is filed)
Please guide me on this point.
Thank you in advance.
Sir, in money recovery suit, the plaintiff/ Petitioner get interim attachment orders on defendant properties. while the court ammen attaching such properties, a third party voluntarily stood as surity and he handed over his property original documents to the court ammen. The court ammen prepared and submitted his report accordingly. after that in such suit the defendant set exparty and passed the orders. the defendant alienated his properties to others. How i approach the court through EP for recovery of suit decree amount. the court did not pass any order in such I.A. based on court ammen report. kindly suggest me.
The suit was remanded from the High court to the Trial court with a specific direction that Defendant 1 should produce some additional documents and the suit should be reheard and disposed of.
There are 3 defendants in the suit. The Plaintiff had claimed separate relief against all three Defendants. Defendants 2 and 3 never filed the first appeal or second appeal after the initial decree of the suit. They remained non-contesting parties.
Now after the remand Trial court has again decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff. Now in the first appeal, even Defendant 2 joined as appellant. Is it allowed? Since they never contested the case earlier. Is it not that findings in the judgment before remand reached finality with respect to defendant 2 and defendant 3?
Proposition 1: In case where there are 3 defendants [2 Indian Defendants and 1 Foreign Defendant] – the Plaintiff does not have the address of 3rd defendant (who is residing in a foreign country) – in which case can the Plaintiff compel Indian Defendants 1 & 2 to provide address of the 3rd Defendant who is residing in foreign Country?
Section 33rule 1 application format
Dear sir
I want to file suit in section 33 rule 1
But I not found any of format about this kind of suit please provide me if you have