A Company invites builders to tender and award to build 1000 houses under PMAY scheme at each locations (72 builders x rs 50 lakhs paid), EMD amount Rs 50 lakhs, as construction was going on, many builders paid the EMD, over the period all come to know it was a fraud company. Let us say Company 'A" who had collected EMD, fraud company, opens two subsidiary companies and make women as Directors. say "B" and 'C". Company "A" registers all the land meant for construction site in the names of "B" and "C". Legal system in India fails to prosecute both Directors of Company "B" and "C", in Civil case only property owned by Company "A" can be attached, as money was given to money "A". Now a police case criminal case is going on in sessions court, to whom 5 FIRS registered and 8 police complaints are there. Builders formed an association wanted to fight the civil case, "b" and "C" companies have all the lands. How to get our money and attach the land for shortages if any. Also how to implicate the Company "A" owner in to Goonda list Thanks
A person had purchased a piece of land (through a registered sale deed) from a family member (male) before 15 years. now a daughter stands to claim the property by virtue of being daughter and having right of ownership acquired in ancestral property. The right of person can supersede the right of daughter as he is holding uninterrupted adverse possession of land.
month and year in which sanad was surrendered
I have wrongly made obc certificate when im not mature. .but my grandfather document says sc so from prouf of sc i have made a sc certificate. .can it may cause problem when im appointed in govt job.
There was a sale of property about 22 years ago and the buyers cheques bounced with insufficient funds and title of account was indifferant . We filed civil case cancelling the sale deed
The buyer is willing to pay with interest
my case is the whether i can treat the sale as null and void in court of law then and there itself on bouce of cheque
is there any case law available
buyer is manipulating and taking refuge under insolvency lAW
Respected experts,
A decree was passed in a suit filed by plaintiff granting permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the possession and enjoyment of suit schedule immovable property, on contest.
Now, defendant preferred an appeal along with application under Order 41 rule 5 cpc seeking stay of execution of the said decree. Is it maintainable?
Pls give your valuable inputs. Thanks in advance.
In the year 2019, I had to pay 15 lakh rupees to a person as per an agreement that I can pay 6000 rupees per month in 20 years and for that I will give 30% of my property as security and I will return the security once the entire amount is paid. But due to the crisis during Corona, I have not been able to pay the monthly amount of 6000 rupees for the last two years. So if this party files a civil case on my behalf now, will my property be confiscated? Can they claim only 30% as per agreement? The value of the property is now less compared to the price of the property and the number to pay. So will they be able to attach my remaining 70% through the court? Can I get a stay from the court for not being able to return due to the corona crisis? How best to deal with this case?
I'm defendant in money recovery case. But complainant has to pay me money in some other matter. Hence I have not paid him. Can I take that defense stating that he is due to me which is more than the suit filed amount. I can submit documents pertaining to defense.
Dear Experts,
My uncle purchased three plots in a panchayat property @2015 in Hosur.Later in 2017, the developer applied for HNTDA approval and changed the design of all the property. My uncle with other three buyers filed a writ petition in Madras HC. Due course one of the petitioner was expired last year.Should we proceed with the existing case or should we notpress and file a fresh petition?
Reg partition suit
My grandfather bought 10 acres of land in 1911,he had 10 acres of land and he has partition with his 2 son in 1921,it was registered partition,which we didn't have knowledge.The heirs of my grandfather's brother without showing the partitioned deed claimed it as joint family property and got preminilary decree in high court for partition,when we came to know about my grandfather partition deed we went for review,now our counsel has withdrawn our review and says when they come for final decree,we can object and go to high court, please eeply