JEGADEESAN
29 July 2024 at 22:49
Sir
I would like to clarify some doubt regarding Women Rights under Hindu Succession Act .
Actually My Grandfather namely S. Perumal bought some property to the extent of 37.5 cent from each son, out of total 75 cents belongs to a family .
Originally the property was bought by E . Murugan & he has died in 1972 without written any will or settlement & he has leaving behind him , totally 3 daughters & 2 Sons ( Namely 1. Thiraviyam & 2. Sivan and his wife .
Thereafter S .Perumal has got the Sale deed on 26.11.1974 (Vide Doc No 2158/1974) from Thiraviyam to the extent of 37.5 Cents
& another one Sale deed in 1.6.1975 from Sivan to the extent of 37.5 Cents Both of them sold based on oral partition between family members and sold for family purposes.
In between the above Murugan's daughter namely Sornam & Lakshmi (After their marriage )Executed a sale deed in favour of Manikkam on 26.11.1974 (Vide Doc No 2160/1974) to the extent of 30 Cent mentioning that Legal heirs of Murugan and claim 2/5 share of total 75 Cents . ( The same portion of land has been already sold by her brother Thiraviyam & it has been clearly mentioned in the sale deed with exact boundaries)
i.e. They have claimed without considering her mother even she was alive at that time and also oral partition existing between their brothers as equal share of total property between the brothers ( male legal heirs only).
Now I want to challenge the right over the above property against Manikkam Since he has got the land by forgery sale deed on the following grounds
i.e. 1. Once again executed the sale deed even the same land was already sold ,
and
2. sale deed executed without considering oral partition between family members,
and
No right to females while the land was already orally partitioned and also married daughters have no right to claim the property ( Since they have married before 25.3.1989 )
1.Am I correct with the provisions of Hindu Succession (Tamil Nadu Amendment Act 1989) Act?
2.What will be possibility of winning chances of this case ? Mostly or 50:50?
Suwarn
29 July 2024 at 20:44
I am Male 40 years Old. In An Major road accident My Father, Mother & My Married Sister along with their husband(My Jijaji) died.
Now only i have survived along with My wife and my Sister's two children aged 20 Years & 22 Years. My Father has self acquired Property in his name. So now who should be legal owner of My Father property? if no will is there.
1) Is it me only?
2) Or even My sister's children have stake in same?
Also want to inform My Father's Dad & Mother(MY Grandmother & Grandfather already died 10 years before accident) And My Father two Real brother.
at your mercy
28 July 2024 at 15:51
1. I bought a property through an auction under the SARFAESI Act and received a sale certificate and possession. The Indian Bank, as the secured creditor, got an eviction order from the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Salem on 09/11/2021 to help you take physical possession of the property.
2. After taking possession,I did some repairs, updated the property records, and completed the necessary registrations.
3. On 23/01/2024, the original borrower forcibly entered the property, breaking the locks, and is currently occupying it. my belongings are still inside.
4. I filed a First Information Report (FIR) with the police, but they were uncooperative and delayed registering the FIR by 60 days, only doing so after you approached higher authorities. The court has now recognized the crimes committed by the borrower.
5. Ifiled a writ in the Madras High Court, which advised using Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act in the CJM court. However, some lawyers believe that since this section was already used by the secured creditor, I cannot use it again. I have also filed a civil suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act (SRA), which is yet to be heard.
6. The borrower's case is still pending in the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), and he has been delaying the process with various applications. He has deposited some drafts into the loan account, but they couldn't be credited because the account was frozen. Now the amount is in a temporary account. The borrower is making claims about the reserve price and notice issues.
7. I am considering filing a contempt of court case in the CJM court, which had issued the eviction notice, due to the borrower's actions.
please advise thanks
Suwarn
28 July 2024 at 15:13
Does below statement holds true .
"On partition the ancestral property comes into the hands of individual
persons/coparceners, then it has to be treated as a separate property and
such a person shall be entitled to dispose of the Coparcenery property
treating it to be his separate property."
Ashish Panchal
27 July 2024 at 22:59
I am staying at last house at lane of co op society wi 20 feet drive way. 2 neighbours are parking their car such a way that I can not drive in or drive out my car and everytime I have to call them to shift their car. In such matters what is the best way to do?
SK Sharma
27 July 2024 at 19:01
My father is a shebait/ mohatamim and pujari of a temple situated in Himachal Pradesh. He has also performed puja and managed temple affairs since 1983 to 1997 exclusively.
In 1997, government takeover the management of temple and fixed 20% share in the offerings of the temple to my father as remuneration and also assigned exclusive puja rights in the temple for whole year.
In 2013, the temple administration i.e. SDM distributed puja rights among other brothers who had never performed puja at any stage till 2013.
My father challenged the order dated 02.11.2013 in HP High Court.
On 01.01.2024, SDM made submission before the hon'ble court to reconsider the issue at his own level.
The court accepted his submission and directed him to decide the issue of duty arrangement, distribution of share in offerings and induction of Respondent No. 5 to 7 (brothers of my father).
The SDM denied to decide the issue and continued the adverse order dated 02.11.2013.
My father has deprived of 12 months puja and 20% share in the offerings as remuneration.
Hence, my query is ::
whether puja right of my father and 20% share in the offerings of the temple as remuneration can be curtailed to 1/4th and distributed among his brothers.
AND is there any provision in law that pujari right falls under inheritance.
please advise me.
SK Sharma
27 July 2024 at 18:50
My father is a shebait/ mohatamim and pujari of a temple situated in Himachal Pradesh. He has also performed puja and managed temple affairs since 1983 to 1997 exclusively.
In 1997, government takeover the management of temple and fixed 20% share in the offerings of the temple to my father as remuneration and also assigned exclusive puja rights in the temple for whole year.
In 2013, the temple administration i.e. SDM distributed puja rights among other brothers who had never performed puja at any stage till 2013.
My father challenged the order dated 02.11.2013 in HP High Court.
On 01.01.2024, SDM made submission before the hon'ble court to reconsider the issue on his own level. The court accepted his submission and directed him to decide the issue of duty arrangement, distribution of share in offerings and induction of Respondent No. 5 to 7.
The SDM denied to decide the issue and continued the adverse order dated 02.11.2013.
My father has deprived of 12 months puja and 20% share in the offerings as remuneration.
Hence, my query is ::
whether puja right of my father and 20% share in the offerings of the temple as remuneration can be curtailed to 1/4th and distributed among his brothers.
please advise me.
Anonymous
27 July 2024 at 01:36
My grandfather was mohtamim of a temple in 1972. After his death my father was appointed as a mohtamim by DC Kangra in 1983. Accordingly, my father managed the temple affairs and performed puja exclusively till 1997.
In 1997, HP Govt. takeover the control of the temple and formed a committee under the chairmanship of SDM to manage the temple.
Being an exclusive pujari and mohtamim of the temple, the Committe assigned 12 months puja and 20% share in the offerings of the temple to my father.
In 2013, SDM made an adverse decision and divided puja and share among 4 brothers of my father stating it the matter of inheritance.
Whereas my grandfather has made a will and bequeathed puja rights exclusively in favour of my father.
1. Whether puja right is a matter of inheritance?
2. Share in offerings which started first time in 1997 is partible among 4 brothers of my father ? whereas my father has performed puja exclusively since 1983 to 2013.
Please advise me
Hari
24 July 2024 at 14:07
I have joined an organization on 18 th Feb 2024 and received a joining bonus of 5 lacs which had a clause stating that I need to repay the full amount if I resign within 12 months of completion from my date of joining., which i didnt notice while accepting the offer on email . Since the organisation was so hostile , and due to the mental harrassment, discrimination by the boss, and i put my resignation and left in April 2024 and job less now , Now the organisation is asking me to repay the joining bonus. However , while i have recd my appointment there is no such clause ( return the joining bonus if i leave before 1 years) So, in this case what should I act? Is it legal to repay or not?
I was planning to sent a notice to them for the harassment and discrimination and playing with my career .
please advise
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Injunction suit
Neighbor is doing scrap business creating nuisance. Is the civil court (Sub Court/Munsiff Court) has jurisdiction to restrain the fellow from doing the scrap business in a plot wherein only residential permit is granted by the local authorities ? Any judgement to substantiate this ?