Swaroop
29 December 2008 at 14:52
FIRSTLY I WOULD LIKE TO INRODUCE MY SELF AS COMSUMER.
I HAD SENT A NOTICE TO A WATER PROOFING COMPANY AND THEIR AUTHORISED DEALER FOR THE DEFICIENCY IN MATERIAL AND SERVICE PROVIDED.
THIS AUTHORISED DEALER WAS INTRODUCED TO ME BY THEIR COMPANY OFFICER.
AFTER SENDING THE NOTICE I HAVE RECEIVED A REPLY FROM THE COMPANY CLAIMING THAT THE DEALER FROM WHOM THE MATERIAL WAS PURCHASED WAS NOT THEIR AUTHORISED DEALER AND THAT MY CLAIM OF THE SAME IS FALSE.
BUT THE SHOPKEEPER OR DEALER HAS CLEARLY MENTIONED IN THE CASH INVOICE THAT HE IS THE AUTHORISED DEALER FOR THEIR COMPANY'S PRODUCTS.
BUT THE SAME IS NOT ACCEPTED BY THE COMPANY. HOW WOULD THIS BE USEFUL TO ME TO FILE A COMPALAINT IN THE CONSUMER COURT AGAINST THE COMPNAY AND THE DEALER.
UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES CAN I HOLD THEM RESPOSIBLE BECAUSE THEY ARE MISLEADING THE CONSUMERS LIKE ME.
CAN I ALSO FILE A CRIMINAL CASE FOR CHEATING?
KINDLY CONFIRM.
Swaroop
27 December 2008 at 16:23
IS IT A HARD AND FAST RULE THAT A NOTICE,
A ORDINARY OR A LEGAL NOTICE SHOULD BE SENT ONLY THROUGH A REGISTERED POST OR CAN ONE SEND IT THROUGH A COURIER AND KEEP THE (POD)PROOF OF DELIVERY AS THE PRROF.KINDLY CONFIRM.
REGARDS
SWAROOP
Swaroop
27 December 2008 at 16:22
IS IT A HARD AND FAST RULE THAT A NOTICE,
A ORDINARY OR A LEGAL NOTICE SHOULD BE SENT ONLY THROUGH A REGISTERED POST OR CAN ONE SEND IT THROUGH A COURIER AND KEEP THE (POD)PROOF OF DELIVERY AS THE PRROF.KINDLY CONFIRM.
REGARDS
SWAROOP
Swaroop
27 December 2008 at 16:22
IS IT A HARD AND FAST RULE THAT A NOTICE,
A ORDINARY OR A LEGAL NOTICE SHOULD BE SENT ONLY THROUGH A REGISTERED POST OR CAN ONE SEND IT THROUGH A COURIER AND KEEP THE (POD)PROOF OF DELIVERY AS THE PRROF.KINDLY CONFIRM.
REGARDS
SWAROOP
Legal_Query
27 December 2008 at 16:02
Dear Friends,
My query is:
'A' bought a land in april-04 from 'B' through unregistered sale deed and a kabja reciept(posession receipt)was given. In year Jan-2007 'B' has sold the said land to 'C' through registered sale deed and possession has already been delivered to 'C'. A notice was sent to 'B' by 'A' after the execution of the registered sale deed whcih had no result. Now what remedies are available to 'A'.
Pls advice with relevant judgments.
Thnks & Rgds
Sonia Verma
27 December 2008 at 11:50
If X had transfered his House to his Daughter (major,unmarried) about 1 month before filing for bankrupcy....can the Reciever claim that House on behalf of the Banks frm whom X had taken Loans?????
Pls reply, its Urgent...
Ranganath.T
26 December 2008 at 18:33
Dear Sir or Madam,
Our is Pvt Ltd company for Business purpose we have approched for Business Loan from with providing proper colateral security against the loan with ICICI Bank after several documentation Bank peoples are collected Processing Fees against Loan sanction but unfortunately they refused our request and loan was not provided and they did not given any reson for refuse. altimately we lost the processing Fees by Rs. 50000.00.
Can any body help me to get the justice, can we file the suit against the Bank, is it prosible or not.
Pls give me your precious opinion on this matter.
Kindly oblige and the needful.
Thanking You.
Yours faithfully,
Ranganath.T
KANDE VENKATESH GUPTA
24 December 2008 at 20:24
Dear Members,
I am appearing for claimant-wife of the deceased, claiming compensation for the death of her husband caused in a motor vehicle accident. The Gross income of the deceased is Rs.25,000/-. The deductions are as follows:
Group Insurance: Rs.100/-
Professional Tax: Rs. 150/-
Contribution to PF: Rs.5,000/-
Housing Loan: Rs.5,000/-
Festival Advance: Rs.1,000/-
Thus, the take home salary is Rs.13,750/-
Now the question is, since the contribution towards Provident Fund and Housing Loan Instalment is voluntarily, which depends of the will and wish of the employee, whether the said amounts can be deducted from the gross income for the purpose of computation of loss of income. I am contending before the Court that the same cannot be deducted since they are voluntary contribution and it is the employee, who can decide the quantum of contribution towards PF as it is in the nature of savings. However, the counsel for the insurance company is contending that only take home salary should be taken while computing the loss of income. Is there any Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court or other High Courts in this regard. Please help me,
my mail ID:
venkateshgupta_kande@yahoo.co.in
Cell: 09885808021
H.No; 1-1-16/1/2/A, Jawaharnagar
R.T.C. Cross Roads, Hyderabad- 500 020
Andhra Pradesh.
Thanks in advance,
V.G.Rao Advocate
24 December 2008 at 17:09
Hi all,
The people in a locality long back purchsed their plots i.e 30 years back under the un registered agreement of sale by paying entire sale consideration,and constructed the buildings theron, and since then they are paying all taxes to concern authorities without any body's interfearance whatsoever. Recently one gentleman who is one of the real owner of aforesaid plots who is also residents of same locality since more than 30 yeras, and also attestant of the aforesaid un registered agreements has presently by claiming the properties of the aforesaid agreemnent holders has filed Land Grabbing case against them.
Under the said circumstances please calrify me whether the real owner will succeed in his case, and further
what other alternative cases or reliefs can be claimed by the agreement holders. ( I am the counsel for agreement holders i.e Respondents in land grabbing cases.)Its urgent.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Dispute Betn Brothers
Dear experts I had already asked this query to which some of u needed some clarification.
I am Hindu By religion .My mother executed a sale deed for 2 sites in my Favour around 9 years Back which were in her name.Now my elder Brother is asking for a share in these sites and has filed a partition suit against me and my mother and my father.(He was not living with us then and even have married a christian girl and have changed his name)Now my mother due to some differences with my wife is supporting my brother being a defendent herself. what will be the outcome of the case.