Soma
23 December 2009 at 07:06
WHETHER ORAL ACKNOWLEDGE OF DEBT RESTART LIMITATION PERIOD IN INDIA?
IF YES UNDER WHAT SECTION OR JUDGMENT?
Anonymous
22 December 2009 at 20:49
Can the executant of a will also be the sole beneficiary also ?
emveeemvee
22 December 2009 at 19:58
Dear Sirs
One who is not able to pay the rent and get evicted from the position with the help cf police , now the question is, he is totally nil financially how can he defend him self with out giving an I.P
Santosh
22 December 2009 at 19:53
Can anybody please suggest me how can I proceed with the housing loan? We have taken housing loan in 1998 Aug'09, due to nonpayment of loan bank has booked a case on SARFAESI Act. We have filled a case in DRT court for clarification on the amount shown in the new paper and the amount shown in the bank statement was different.
As per judgment from DRT, they told to pay total amount to bank and then ask for the clarification.
Bank has given the statement to DRT (The total balance amount with the interest rate of 13% per anum should be paid within a period of 3 Months).
We have cleared the total amount and requested bank to return the land papers by sending a letter to Chief Manager, AGM and GM (no response from the bank )
We met personally with Chief Manager for Land papers, he raise the new point that we have to pay the interest rate 15% per anum. Until we clear the amount the papers will not be returned.
Please let me know if further information is required in this regards.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
22 December 2009 at 13:15
“A” is the DHR-Vendee and whereas “B” is the JDR-Land owner. In an Execution proceeding “B” JDR-Land owner admitted that “today he has handed over the physical possession of the lands to “A” DHr-Vendee in the year 1985.
The said JDR-Land owner has never challenged against the above contention thus it seems DHR-Vendee is in possession of the said lands since 1985. But the revenue records are shown the JDR-Land owner’s name till now.
Now I want to clarify that I am in adverse possession or not? If so how to claim the above lands on my favour, because of the said ground.?
Rajneesh Madhok
22 December 2009 at 13:07
I want to file a Civil Writ Petition against Punjab State Electricity Board, the interested lawyers/ advocates kindly send me the Private message or E-mail to me confirming their desire to take up the case with the fees in lump sum to be charged for the said case.
Rajneesh Madhok,
B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar,
St. No. 2, Railway Road,
Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
Ph: 01824-262569 (O), 268210 (R), 094173-06415
Tele-fax:01824-262569, E-mail: rajneesh_madhok@yahoo.com
Friends,
Regarding under-mentioned case of Shifting of HT Line. I have collected the requiste information from State Information Commission, Chandigarh. From the chronological chart it is evident that the file had been lying about a year to the JE table for almost 10 months and nothing had been done. All the documents pertaining to the case are ready.
Punjab State Electricity Board Complaints - Rs in lacs depostied for shifting of high tension cables
View all Punjab State Electricity Board complaints
Punjab State Electricity Board
Posted: 2009-04-17 by Rajneesh Madhok Send email
Rs in lacs depostied for shifting of high tension cables
Punjab State Electricity Board is careless about the life & security of the consumers.
Respected Sir,
This is to inform you that my friend Mr. Narinder Pal S/o Mr. Kedar Nath of Phagwara has been facing problem that the Electric high tension wires are passing on his land. He requested the concerned Executive Engineer (XEN), Punjab State Electricity Board, G.T. Road, Goraya. The request had also been made to Senior Engineer Nawanshahar. The final estimate about the shifting charges had been calculated. Now the points to be noted.
1. Mr. Narinder Pal deposited Rs. 1, 23, 157/- vide Book No. D 91505 (Shifting fees) vide Receipt No. 226 Est No. 82001/08100 amounting to Rs.(One Lac twenty three thousand one hundred fifty seven only). On 8/5/08
2. Mr. Narinder Pal met the concerned XEN several times and he send him back on one pretext or another that the cable is not in stock.
3. Then Mr. Narinder paid Rs. 20, 000/- after 4-5 days of filing the application under the table to the XEN concerned and he promised to do the needful within 7-10 days.
4. Then Mr. Narinder Pal connected the XEN to get the job done. He said that I shall talk to the concerned SE.
5. The concerned SE has been retired recently but the job has not been done so far. Though he was the party to receive the amount of bribe.
6. Then Mr. Narinder Pal requested the concerned XEN to provide me the length of the cable required in shifting the cables from the particular site.
7. As the site plan of shifting the High tension wires had been finalized and more than one year has been passed till now, the job has not been done.
8. Today as well Mr. Narinder’s son Mr. Abhimanu called the XEN Mr. Surinder Pal Singh at his Mobile number 096461-16033 from 99152-74848 at 11:32 AM to get the job done, but he keep on making promises to do the needful.
9. When party is ready to pay for the cable in addition to the amount deposited in the department then why not the department is shifting the cables and making this or that promise.
10. I am going to request to the concerned XEN by SPEED POST for getting the job done. Whether there will be any action in this regard.
11. Whether there is any other parameter or the party has to file the suit against Punjab State Electricity board on deficiency in service’s part.
Yours truly,
Rajneesh Madhok,
B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar, St. No. 2,
Railway Road, Phagwara-144401 (Pb)
Ph: 01824-262569 (O), 268210 ®, 094173-06415
Tele-fax: 01824-262569, E-mail: rajneesh_madhok@yahoo.com
Anonymous
22 December 2009 at 10:23
Dear Friends ,
compromise deed entered by parties in the year 1999,and permitted by High Court.Recently in the year 2008, one of the party came to know (through WILL),that he is entitled for 1/4 share but given 1/10 share.The partition is still not effected. What he should do? Can he has to approach
High Court for a Review?
With regards.
Parveen Kr. Aggarwal
22 December 2009 at 00:46
What remedy is available to a person in possesion who wants to avail the benefit of perfection of his title by way of adverse possession?
SATYANARAYANA K
21 December 2009 at 22:20
Respected All Experts, one client approach me for suggestion, please suggest, my client have a shop, gave it for rent to "x" but x gave sub lease to "Y". here x used to pay rents to my client for 1 year. "Y" did not pay rent to X. after some time my client filed a suit for recovery of Rent for 8 months on "x", subsequently the Hon'ble Court ordered in favour of my client but the "x" did not pay, later Eviction suit is filed On "x" by my client the Hon'ble Court was ordered Eviction order on "x" within 30 days, my Quarries are (1) if "Y" not eviction the premises within 30 days, then what is the my client position (2) Is it "Y" comes under Civil Contempt of Court or not (3) Is liable for punishment "x" but actual possession in the premises "Y" (4) how to execute the order On "X' or "Y" (5) if any other remedy kindly suggest, i am waiting for your valuable replies
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Can a person use certified copy of original paper
Dear Sir/madam,
I am not satisfied with the previous answer given by the experts on this query so I am giving you all summary of my case history and wants to ask you about the usage of Certified copy of the said stamp paper after judgement:- My grandfather & His brother bought 12 beeghas land in rajasthan (1/2:1/2 share in 1960) and died after purchasing, my grandfather's brother through out from the village to my grandmother & my father. In year 2000 my father asked for our 1/2 share of land to my grandfather's brother but he played game with my father and told to take the share in the land(4 beeghas) purchased alone by him in the village. My father is one of my grandfather and my grandfather's brother has 2 son. He made an agreement (on a Rs.100 Stamp paper) with my father that all land should be in the ratio of 1/3:1/3:1/3 means 2/3 of his sons and 1/3 of my father, with this we paid them Rs. 80,000/-. But in the last year the seller of the 4 beeghas village land, got acquired his land back as the land was not registered in my grandfather's brother name. Then my father asked to my grandfather's sons(as he died) to give our 1/2 share in the old land and Rs.80,000 back. But they suit the case against us in the civil court to claim the 1/3:1/3:1/3 share in the land and denying to pay the Rs. 80,000. After 6 month convincing them they ready to take back the case and we dropped the case in the court. We taken the original Stamp paper and the judgement order in our hand. But the confusion is still in my mind that can they use the certified copy of the stamp paper for suit against us for the same purpose that is to claim 1/3:1/3:1/3 again in future. If yes then there is no meaning of dropping the case, as they have got a toy in their hand. We are not in a position to catch their shirt because our Rs. 80,000 still in their hand. they are not willing to pay back, because the villagers are with them. Please suggest me on above case history. Sanjeev Kumar