Hi,
Due to certain(financial)circumstances my father through Registered sale deed House property was kept on my mothers Elder brother name.Recently father expired with out writing any 'Will'.My mothers Elder brother has executed gift deed the House property back to my mother
(now as ITS NOT AN ANSCENTORS PROPERTY).
MY MOTHER WANTS TO GIFT THE SAME TO ME SON.
and some amount of cash to my sister.
what is the implication in future
1)Is MY SISTER WILL HAVE ANY RIGHTS ON THE HOUSE PROPERTY IS SHE HAS TO sign on any documents /RELINQUESH HER RIGHTS ON THE PROPERTY.
2)Gift OR will WHICH ONE IS BEST OPTION.
please kindly help me in this regard.
Hello Sir,
I had changed my surname after my marriage through an afidavit but have lost it.
I want to know if I can change it again back to my original name.
If I cannot change my name,then what should I do to re issue the lost certificate?
Thanks in advance
I want to know the stage of the case, according to the available below information and the same is llsted on 04-12-2009.Whether it is coming for hearing or filing counter?
pls.suggest.
I.A. NO. 1 In SLP(C)No.10907/2005 B. ASHOK RAO MR. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU
XIIA A/N-O Vs. JOINT COLLECTOR AND ORS. MS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR
70, 87, 0 S.(3505) (FOR PERMISSION TO APPROACH TRIAL
2ND LISTING COURT)
Dear Sir,
I,My brother and two younger sisters are in my family.My father is having a property land and building of ground Floor,In May 2004, my father has made a settlement deed unconditionally of 50% uds of the property.Balance 50 % uds is with him, Based on the deed , i have constructed part of ground floor, first floor and second floor with my own funds of Rs.36ooooo/-.since my brother has hot married and living with him so far, due to family problems my father has cancelled the deed on 9th Nov 09.
Register office has cancelled the deed without any prior notice to me.Now I am in problem and proceeding to move to court.
I have got the electricity connection on my name.but I have not transferred the property tax, water tax and sewerage tax.
Can you suggest how to go about it?.
With regards
D.Ravindran.
can i claim the amount of cheque from the legal heirs of the drawer of the cheque.
The Drawer of the cheque has died before the maturity date of the cheques.
The cheques were post dated and the date on the cheques is a date after the death of the drawer.
i.e if darwer died in june 2009 the date is of july 2009.
I dont have any document in support of cheques to prove that why they are issued.
moreover please tell me what the drawer legal heirs can do to evade themselves from this liability.
Judgment of a consumer case was passed on 28.08.2008.
OP did not comply with that.
Now execution case filed..
In fact I found that no consumer case actually lies against them. It is a simple case of sale of land. one agrees to sale 2 decimle land to other and enters into and simple AGREEMENT FOR SALE.. However the complainant(purchaser) managed to get a judgment against the seller.
It is a simple case of transfer of property over which CDF has no jurisdiction.
However no appeal was preffered...Now execution case filed..
What remedy I have?
Revision petition in State Forum possible?
WRIT against the judgment possible?
Objection as to jurisdiction in the execution case itself lies?
Any other remedy?
Whether section 87 of ipc can act as am exception to section 494 of IPC
There is a judgement by supreme court on the point that power to transfer the civil case 4m one state to other state is only with supreme court. Section 23(3) has been made redundant by 1976 amendment. Can any expert provide of the citation 4 that judgement. Thanks
Can any respected lawyer provide me a sample PUT UP PETITION ?
Petition Under Order 39 Rule 2 A Read with Section 151CPC.
A staus qua order has been passed by civil judge-1 court in application under Section 151 CPC,no civil suit filed or pending by the applicant ,Respondent disobeying the order of staus qua for which applicant has filed application Under Order 39 Rule 2A Read with Section 151CPC.Whether the Present application is maintainable against the respondent or not ? referred with case law please.