akash jain
06 February 2009 at 04:58
can a firm can register the sale of the property in which it is existing and the property is in name of joint individual owners ,out of which one is partner of the said firm.
property is not in the name of firm,it is in the name of ind,joint owners. one joint owner purchased the said property by withdrawing from his capital from the said firm.
akash jain
06 February 2009 at 04:58
can a firm can register the sale of the property in which it is existing and the property is in name of joint individual owners ,out of which one is partner of the said firm.
property is not in the name of firm,it is in the name of ind,joint owners. one joint owner purchased the said property by withdrawing from his capital from the said firm.
akash jain
06 February 2009 at 04:57
can a firm can register the sale of the property in which it is existing and the property is in name of joint individual owners ,out of which one is partner of the said firm.
property is not in the name of firm,it is in the name of ind,joint owners. one joint owner purchased the said property by withdrawing from his capital from the said firm.
akash jain
06 February 2009 at 04:55
can a firm can register the sale of the property in which it is existing and the property is in name of joint individual owners ,out of which one is partner of the said firm.
property is not in the name of firm,it is in the name of ind,joint owners. one joint owner purchased the said property by withdrawing from his capital from the said firm.
Jainodin shaikh
05 February 2009 at 22:58
In The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 section 34 is there for Appeals. But an appeal is filed u/r 41 of C.P.C.
Whether the appeal; despite of Special Law and Provision, filed under General Law is tenable?
Please suggest any caselaw on the point of non maintainability of the civil appeal.
vinod bansal
05 February 2009 at 21:13
R/Sir
I was success bidder for supply of sulphuric acid in a govt. plant,being success bidder acid was supplied by me on demand of plant,after one month without any reason or intimating me plant officer stopped my supply & called short term tender for the supply of acid for the same period for which my tender was going on.Being aggrieved i contacted to concern officers,they replied as now the rate of acid in market is much less than rete on which you are supplying us acid,i told them it is wrong as first of all there is no any down fall in rates secondly there was no any such condition in our contract that during the tender term if there is any down fall in rates govt. plant officers are free to call fresh tenders,ultimately i filed a civil suit & succeeded in getting injunction order from the court in my favour,court ordered defendent not to call/open fresh tender till further order of the court,now problem is that plant is still receiving acid from the open market & they are not receiving acid from me being success bidder/tenderer.Now question is this whether it is contempt of court or not,i want to file an application against defendent for contempt/disobedience of court order.plz help me.Thanks
M. PIRAVI PERUMAL
05 February 2009 at 10:56
Can any of our members provide me the full text of the Delhi High Court Judgement permitting the restaurants and star hotels collecting in excess of the MRP.
allurisivajiraju
05 February 2009 at 08:17
Respected Seniors,
In a Partition suit, in the plaint some of the necessary parties to the suit are not added as parties by the PLintiffs.
Then the defendants taken a defence in their written statement about the non joinder of necessary parties to the suit.
Then Hon'ble Court framed issues exect the non joinder of necessary parties. Immediately the Defendants filed a petition to frame as issue about non joinder of necessary parties to the suit and the said petition was allowed by the Court.
In this case I am appearing for defendants.
In the above circustances is there any chance to dismiss the suit without conducting trial by Hon'Court since the plaintiffs are intentionally not mentioned their own family members as necessary parties to the suit?
Mohamed Ali
04 February 2009 at 14:59
A Sunni hanafi Family partition suit is decreed. As per decree male is entitle for 2/17th share and female is entitle for 1/17th share in the property. Decree consisted of two types of properties town properties and revenue lands.
Final decree proceedings filed in 1989 to execute the decree, the town properties were divided as per decree and part of final decree proceedings for town properties is completed in 1996,
Some LR’s of one of the plaintiff who are not entitle for share has been jointly allotted properties in town along with other heirs of plaintiff,
Now execution is pending for town properties, and other part of same final decree proceedings for revenue lands is still pending.
Now we have file and IA in pending final decree proceedings to strike out LR”s who are not entitle for share,
we also want to get back the town properties allotted in 1996 to those LR’s who are not entitle for share.
Whether we have to file a separate suit or we have to raise this issue in the pending execution or we can raise this issue in pending final decree proceedings for revenue lands.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
co-op.rights
Can sectary of multi state co-operative societies sign the instrument like as share certificate in the absence of chief executive or managing director?