LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

jhanvi   22 June 2008 at 09:45

ATM case happened in Baroda

Dear Sir,

Thanks a lot for the reply. Appreciate.
The sharebroker to whom it is believd that these person have given the money has got the bail from Ahmedabad high court. he would be released monday itself i.e tommorow. We have also decided to apply for the bail in the high court may be tom or day after tom.Expecting your comments as everyone from whom we have taken guidance says that as the sharebroker has got the bail these two person might get the bail. Will be waiting for reply.

Regards,
Jhanvi

bhaskar   22 June 2008 at 00:26

STUDENT LOAN COSIGNER

madhurMehta   21 June 2008 at 18:22

consumer court judgment


plz.give me the judgments of comercial/livelyhood purpose in electricity board cases.

thaks in advance

Srinivas.B.S.S.T   20 June 2008 at 23:48

orders of consumer forum

I have filed a case against the electricity officials for wrongful disconnection of service inspite of payment of bills regulary. My client is not the owner of premises but only a tenant. The service connection is in the name of landlord. Landlord committed default in payment of bills pertaining to other serice connections in his name. The electricity officials disconnected the service connection of my client though he is regular in payment of bills. I have filed an interlocutary application and obtained orders of reconnection. But the Officials are not heeding to the orders of the forum and refused to reconnect the service stating that they would prefer an appeal. I have filed a petition under section 27 of Consumer Protection Act for issuance of arrest warrants against Opposite parties. What else can i do???

amit kumar choubey   20 June 2008 at 21:31

Competition Act, 2002

I would like to ask about MRTP Commission.
When the competition Act, 2002 is going to replace the MRTP Act and Commission. Is there any stipulated timeframe for that?

M.R.Nair   20 June 2008 at 17:08

Query under Maharashtra Rent Control Act

A limited company (A) whose is my tenant, and whose paid up share capital is less than Rs. 1.00 crores has been taken over by another limited company (B) whose paid up share capital is more than Rs. 1.00 crores, and is now under its (B) management and termed its 'associate' company. B is also referred to as the Holding Company of A in the balance sheet of A. Can A, my tenant be evicted under the above referred act since it is now held under the management of B whose paid up capital is more than Rs. 1.00 crores? What are the legal implications of the terms 'under the same management', 'associate' and 'holding company'?

M.R.Nair   20 June 2008 at 17:08

Query under Maharashtra Rent Control Act

A limited company (A) whose is my tenant, and whose paid up share capital is less than Rs. 1.00 crores has been taken over by another limited company (B) whose paid up share capital is more than Rs. 1.00 crores, and is now under its (B) management and termed its 'associate' company. B is also referred to as the Holding Company of A in the balance sheet of A. Can A, my tenant be evicted under the above referred act since it is now held under the management of B whose paid up capital is more than Rs. 1.00 crores? What are the legal implications of the terms 'under the same management', 'associate' and 'holding company'?

madhurMehta   20 June 2008 at 16:26

judgment of ncdrc

plz.give me the judgments of comercial/livelyhood perpose in electricity board cases.

thaks in advance

Rama Verma   20 June 2008 at 10:43

company law

what is a procedure for forming a private company.

Alluri Sivaji Raju   20 June 2008 at 06:58

Provincial Insolvancy Act

Hi friends! in a pending creditor Insolvancy petition the Respondent / Debtor sold his another property which was not shown in the schedule of the pending petition, without taking any consideration only with a view to defrauding the creditors. The said sale transaction is within the limitation to set a side the sale transaction i.e.90 days. The petitioner / Creditor neither filed another creditor I.P. nor filed a petitioner for add the recently sold property schedule by amending the pending petition. Please advice. What type of remedy the Petitioner / Creditor have for set aside the sale deed which was executed recentsly by the Respondent/Debtor.