Anonymous
03 September 2022 at 20:58
Respected Members Good evening
Please guide me in the following
A man krishna rao running small shop since 50 years, adjacent to satyanarayana swami temple compound wall, which has been let to him by one Gorongo Goudo and said goudo was died 30 years back.Â
Infact Hanumanth bukta was heridatory trustee of the private temple, archakas appointed by their ancestrals occupied the temple then said Hanumanth bukta filed suit in 1908 for posession inrespect of temple and won the case. subsequently with interference of locals, entered into agreement with archakas gouranga panda and other and handed over the diety and other articles, with an understanding that archaks should return the same whenevery asked by the Hanumanth bukta or his family. after the death of said hanumanth bukta, the family members of archakas settled the temple properties among themselves without any right. later there were cases among the archakas regarding the right over the temple in the year 1998 and 2001 & 2010 and all were dismissed. Lower court found that parties to suits do not have right over the temple, given a direction to Assistant Commissioner Endowments to take over the same. The order of the lower court challenged in appeal and in said appeal the appellate court deleted the part of lower courts order directing the Asst. Endowments Commissiioner "to hand over the posession" has been deleted. Hence the Endowments dept. nothing to do with said temple.Â
As per the understanings between the families of archakas.....four families collecting the rentals of four shops adjacent to compound wall of the temple.
Recently one of the archaka hardly trying to eliminate the others.....gathered some local people, injucted them to widen the main entrance (simhadwara of the temple). So that the shop under the supervision of another archaka can easily be removed. On the other side there was shop under the supervision of said archaka, but with his cunning nature he left the area of his shop, spreaded construction towards the area of the shop under the super vision of another archaka, executed his plan successfully, constructed dwaram with malafied intention.. Colluded with the staff of Endowments Dept. harassing the Petty Vendor.Â
approached Dist.legal Services authority, praying to remove / vacate the shop by submitting a representation mentioning the Municipal commissioner, Dist.Collector and Endowments Dept as respondents, praying to direct the authorities to remove the shop. the same is violative and against to right of living. Repeatedly the Endowments staff harassing the petty shop owner to vacate and threatning that they will evict and throw the goods forcibly. Infact said temple is not under the Endowments Department, but unlawfully interfering in the issue to support the archaka, locked the shop and tried to demolish the structure, who is a forcible man. other departments having careful inquiry kept quite in the issue. Police did not given support to the Petty Vendor, but orally suggested the Endowments staff not to do so without any right.
Devotees are not insisting for widening the existing door, but the crooked mentality archaka pinching some locals in his support and to take legal shelter approached Dist.Legal Services Authority with the help of some of Court Staff.Â
issue is pending with Dist Legal Services Authority
Dist.Legal Services Authority orally asking the petty vendor to vacate the shop without going through facts. Said Petty vendor was feared and disturbed. If he vacates the shop his family will suffer on roads for livelihood.
How said petty vendor can get help by approaching court, can he file a suit for injunction against the endowment authorities and archaka to restrict their forcible activities. Petty Vendor needs immediate help for survival
Anonymous
03 September 2022 at 20:47
Mr. Abdul contacted Smt. Mohini to purchase his land, both entered into agreement for Rs. 5 lakhs (un-registered) witnessed by Mr. Kiran and Smt. Gowri. Abdul requested the Vendee to give maxm amount of Rs. 4lakhs as he was in dire need of money. After receipt of said money he left to his native place in Krishna District. Did not turning up to take balance amount and registration.
Smt. Mohini requested many times and got served legal notice to Abdul, and he refused. Then Smt. Mohini Sent notices to witnesses of the transaction Mr. Kiran and Smt. Gowri, asking them to suggest the Vendor to complete the transaction at the sooner, they too refused to receive the notices.
The Vendee Smt. Mohini was under loss and stress due the the act of the Vendor.
How Can she get register the site in her name
under what provisions of law she can approach the court of law and against whom Smt. Mohini can sue for remedy
NAGARAJ
03 September 2022 at 18:03
my client name is manjula she was studied at shivmogga till 10th class and now her name changed as vinutha in her adhaar card, present adhaar card address is stands at bangalore.. shall i file declaration suit for name change at bangalore jurisdiction courts...?
Thanks for ur precious reply.
chirag patel
02 September 2022 at 19:02
Supreme Court of India has in its judgement given some directions to the govt. organisation within the deadline date. Organisation has not complied with the order and two days have passed. what is the remedy now available with the petitioner. can we file and police complaint for non compliance or we have to again file contempt of court ? Please suggest appropriate remedy now.
Anonymous
02 September 2022 at 16:45
We're are 5 legal heirs in property of late father who died intestate in 1996.
Two legal heirs involved in father's prop. stock broking business didn't clear the objection of high court which asked for dividend details on the list of shares submitted to court. They had managed to convince father to open joint account for the business and pocketed the dividends running in to lacs of rupees.
What options the 3 legal heirs have for getting their share?
Mohan Krishan
02 September 2022 at 10:15
I need a very junior lawyer
to handle a few of my personal cases in civil and consumer forums in
delhi and gurgaon - basically I will be preparing etc and he will
provide some guidance, coordination etc. Will pay small fees as
a lumpsum or otherwise. If you can help me connect to some of them.
Thanks. Sharad.
anil a ghaisas
28 August 2022 at 12:30
We are having a rental tenement in Dombivli East. Our landlord has filed a suit for eviction on grounds of default of Rent payment & nonuse of place This is a case in Kalgan Civil Court since 27/8/2008 I pay rent very regularly in court in advance every year on both of us, My Nabor A. R Desponde
Earlier All this is being done as a part of harassment as he had filed a similar suit against us in 1993 which was subsequently decided in our favoring 1992
Since then he did not accepts the court's order & thus it was contempt of court But we kept quite and continued sending rent by Money Orders & he continued to refuse the same
Again after about 16 years he file suit in 2008 which refer referred above His intent is to evict us & contact malty story bulling in that premises Hence he is bent on evicting us since begging
During hearings in the meanwhile Land lord has claimed accommodation under Bonafide conditions for his use > Further he specifically stated in his affidavit that his brother is not having any accommodation
Our Building is in Prominent Place near Staining and has a good chances/ Scope of creating huge Source of Income by Developing A Tower
We have submitted (i) Details of the Area of vacant rooms in the said building in his custody
(2)We have given related photos of my landlord sons second ownership accommodation in the DOMBIVLI & Also given a related agreement for reference
In all 7 persons are staying in his family, and occupying around 5000 sq. ft. area in their hand.
Leaving aside all this evidences the suit has been disposed On this basis there is scope to believe that some mollified transaction has been done by landlord & the decision is purchased (en-cashed)
Kindly give your verdict on this query whether it is fair & legal decision of evicting us from our accommodation
We have sufficient documentary proof to prove that it’s a clear-cut case of arrestment
Ultimately we shall be requesting Court to give us a review Order or / we may proceed in appeal . pl advise how far our stand will be successful
Yours Sincerely
/A R Deshpande
Prabhakar Karandikar
28 August 2022 at 11:46
In extraordinary circumstances such as inordinate delay by Judgement Debtor in paying the decretal amount, can the Courts award interest pendente lite even when the decree is silent on the issue of interest pendente lite?
Prabhakar Karandikar
Anonymous
27 August 2022 at 07:19
One of my close relatives booked a PLOT IN AGRA with Ansals around more than 16 years back and paid all the instalments till 2013 .LAST INSTALMENT WAS TO BE PAID WHEN DEVELOPMENT OF PLOT WAS COMPLETE. Without development of Plot Ansals demanded last instalment for which was not paid by my relative and they and ansals were requesyed yo develop the plot before last instalment. THEREAFTER, UMPTEEN REQUESTS WERE DELIVERED BY HAND TO CORPORATE OFFICE OF ANSALS BUT NOT A SINGLE REPLY WAS GIVEN BY THEM AND NOW NOBODY IS THERE IN ANSALS OFFICE TO RESPOND TO OUR REQUESTS MY RELATIVE DOES NOT HAVE ANYL PAPER OF THE PLOT EXCEPT RECEIPTS OF PAYMENT OF ALL THE INSTALMENTS EXCEPT THE LAST ONE. PLEASE ADVISE 1, WHAT MY RELATIVE SHOULD DO TO TO INSIST ANSALS TO EITHER GIVE POSSESSION OF THE PLOT OT REFUND MONEY WITH INTEREST. HERE PROBLEM IS NOBODY IS THERE IN THE ANSALS OFFICE WHOM ONE CAN APPROACH. 2. CAN MY RELATIVE FILE COMPLAINT WITH RERA AS THIS IS A CASE OF PLOT ONLY AND THERE IS NO REGISTRY OF PLOT AS SAME WAS NOT DEVELOPED AS PER AGREEMENT WHEN LAST INSTALMENT WAS DEMANDED BY ANSALS IN 2013. 3, AS THIS IS A FRAUD, WHAT OTHER ACTION CAN BE TAKEN IN THIS REGARD.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Forcible acts of endowment employees and crooked archaka
A man krishna rao running small shop since 50 years, adjacent to satyanarayana swami temple compound wall, which has been let to him by one Gorongo Goudo and said goudo was died 30 years back. None of the archaka has absolute right and title over the temple, cases run between archaks confirmed the same, lower and senior division courts dismissed their suits stating they do not have any right. Even said temple is not under Endowment Department. One archaka srinivas with crooked mentality colluded with staff of Endowments department, trying to demolish shop of petty vendor Krishna Rao by forcibly evicting him, and to ruine his livelyhood as Krishna Rao is paying rentals to other archaka Pintu.
said archaka Srinivas approached Dist. Legal Services authority, submitted a representation to order for eviction of shop and mentioning the Dist. Collector, Municipal Commision etc., as respondents. Dist.Legal Services Committee orally asking Krishna Rao to vacate the shop. If it happens so, petty vendors family suffer starvation. Â
issue is pending with Dist Legal Services Authority, but the Endowments Department staff threatning the Petty Vendor of disposession and throwing out the goods in the shop.
How said petty vendor can get help by approaching court, can he file a suit for injunction against the endowment authorities and archaka srinivas to restrict their forcible activities. Petty Vendor needs immediate help for survivalÂ