Mustafa
11 September 2017 at 22:36
Dear sir
I was charged under ndps act for consumption of ganja I was produced in the court they made me pay fine of 2000 and let me go . my question here is will this effect my visa application to any country and my passport renewal as it is coming due by 2018 my parent and my wife don't know about this by will eventually come to know if either of them get rejected we are planning for pilgrim to Iraq.
Your quick response will be highly appreciated
Regards
Veijay
11 September 2017 at 18:47
Hi..If any SC candidate conversts to Christianity, will his certificated by cancled and should he/she get BC-C certificate? If so, please give the details where it is mentioned either in Constitution or in Indian Penal Code
Sugandha
10 September 2017 at 12:29
I want to know the facts of the case -
Ex Capt Harish uppal vs. Union of India ( AIR 2003 SC 739)
Judgement is available but I need the actual facts
calender
31 August 2017 at 01:31
How can one file an SLP against a Supreme Court's Judgment?
Need to prove it. Please suggest a way.
Anonymous
25 August 2017 at 23:36
Whether a writ can be filed in high court if order of an authority is void ab initio but the issue has not been raised in civil appeal before tribunal and high court and civil petition has been dismissed.
T.P.Shukla
25 August 2017 at 23:34
Whether a writ can be filed in high court if order of an authority is void and initio but the issue has not been raised in civil appeal before tribunal and high court and civil petition has been dismissed
Saurabh Agrawal
24 August 2017 at 17:15
Can anyone give example of any such case registered on against this rule.
Divya
24 August 2017 at 14:25
RESPECTED EXPERTS
ON account of serious personal reasons, I was compelled to file IN-PERSON WRIT PETITION BEFORE HONBLE HIGH COURT BOMBAY
1. Under articles 226 and 215 of Constitution of India for abusing procedures of high court, abusing procedures of all courts, suo-moto contempt of high court etc
suddenly people are telling me that I NEED TO MAKE ''STATE OF MAHARASHTRA" as a FORMAL party in the writ petition..
please guide if "AMENDMENT OF WRIT PETITION" CAN BE ALLOWED
AND IS IT COMPULSORY TO MAKE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA A PARALLEL PARTY IN WRIT PETITION
ALSO CAN THIS AMENDMENT BE DONE THROUGH CHAMBER SUMMONS OR ONLY THROUGH A CIVIL APPLICATION
PLEASE ASSIST ME
Anonymous
19 August 2017 at 01:00
This is very sensitive query, as I donot want to reveal all the facts here but I need the expert opinion for the Public domain and for the interest of the common people opposing the favoritism, nepotism, irregularities
This case is very close to one of my associate brother, who filed the case for termination of his contract tenure in one of premier Government organisation of India. He lost the case in CAT, High Court as both the courts followed the Constitutional Bench Judgment state of Karnatka vs Uma Devi which has given that contract appointment is aginst the statutory provisions and has no right for regaularisation. He then filed the SLP which was admitted,as there were 300 contract workers in the organization. Subsequently, the 300 contract workers get regularized. The SCI bench asked the petitioner to furnish the details through Interlocutory application. Meanwhile, the bench has changed
My queries are:
1 Since the orgnaisation has reguslarised the 300 contract employees which is aginst the constitutional framework and legal provisions, how the same can be challenged?
2 The act of regaulrisation is contrary to the constitutional Bench Judgment uma devi case which clearly says that there is no by passing of the constitutional scheme. If the organization deliberately violate the constitutional Bech Judgment, how can such organization be brought under law?
Kindly provide the expert opnion, as the matter is not linked with the interest of any party but is meant for uprooting of the malpractice and favortism
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Prayer for perpetual injunction order
Dear Sir /Madam, greetings of the day !
There was an existing state high way with a total of132 feet width; the State Govt & Central Govt has taken a decision to upgrade such highway to National Highway. The state Govt. wants to upgrade to NH to avoid burden of laying and maintaining the present road.
Due to which, the National High way Authority of India (NHAI) wants to design by pass roads for certain towns and through certain lands owned by private farmers. The farmers are not willing to give their lands to the Govt (NHAI) for designing the Bypass road since it is only their livelihood.
Certain agents of the NHAI & private parties entering the farming fields without any intimation to the concerned land owners and laying stones and laying peck marking and surveying through the lands. The farmers are finding difficult to resist them. Presently the farmers are frightened about their lands and livelihood they earn through the farming. As such there is connectivity between the starting and ending point of the proposed road project.
Is there any judicial remedy(perpetual injunction order through WP or PIL or both ) to stop the said by pass road project and confine the NHAI to the present existing 132 feet road without disturbing the owner ship of the farmers in the proposed by pass project.
Your valuable opinion is deeply appreciated. This would help the farmers to avail legal remedy and further help the farming community to lead their farming to earn their lively hood .
With best regards,
-moinuddin