Anonymous
29 April 2010 at 11:10
An order by electricity ombudsman lucknow has upheld the judgement passed by District electricity consumer forum in favour of the consumer. order of ombudsman challenged by electricity deptt before high court but deptt could not get any interim only time granted for counter and rejoinder. my question is whether deptt is liable to pay immediately to the consumer and if not paying what remedy available.
Anonymous
28 April 2010 at 10:49
My wife is a teacher at a Private School in Gurgaon. The school has issued a circular to all teachers demanding that they undertake Census Duty during the summer break. The notification says that this is manadatory and refusal could lead to imprisonment upto three years.
To me, this comes across as violation of fundamental rights. Firstly because, the school is neither a municipality or government funded / semi-funded school. Secondly, when the teachers asked about the provision of security while they are at this work, the authorities havent responded.
I wish to understand if this is a legal demand from the municipality and the school? Is this really manadatory, even though she is not a government employee? Is this a punisheable offence if she refuses to undertake this?
Member (Account Deleted)
24 April 2010 at 01:28
Sir, Can a service matter be raised as fundamental right through a petition under article 32 directly, even in the presence of alternative remedy through CAT?
Member (Account Deleted)
24 April 2010 at 01:27
Sir, Can a service matter be raised as fundamental right through a petition under article 32 directly, even in the presence of alternative remedy through CAT?
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 20:10
Dear Sirs,
kindly tell as to what is 'Rule of Nisi' and what is meant when it is said that 'the rule of Nisi is being made absolute hereby'? Thanks.
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 13:20
i am sangeeta.I am a hindu girl and want to marry with a Chirstian boy Emmanueil.Our parents are not allow us to marry with each other.his DOB is 9-nov-1983 and my is 30-aug-1985.we want to get marry with each other but we have the time only when we are on job time not more than and we never want to tell about aour marriag to our parents for 2 to 3 months.we want it secret for 2 to 3 months.what to do now.if we discuss it with our parents then they will forcly marry me with other boy but not with him.so we want to make secret this marriage for few time period so that our parents does not make any harm to us.Sorry my english is not so good so please understand what i want to say and what solution i need.
Anonymous
23 April 2010 at 09:02
Respected experts,
I want to know whether or not the two subsections are not contrary to each other in "The right of children to free and compulsory education Act, 2009, under section 14. The first sub.sec says, the age will be determined by the birth certificate for the purpose of admission. The second subsection says no child will be denied admission for the lack of age proof. please clarify this ambiguity.
Member (Account Deleted)
23 April 2010 at 01:05
sir, recently i filed an O.A. before CAT for my reinstatement in contractual services as my fundamental right to equality under art. 14 since all my juniors are retained
earlier also i filed a petition before high court on ground of harassment and no issue of discrimination was settled by high court and it was dismissed in limine speaking that there is no legal right vested in such employee to compel employer to continue him.
no issue of violation of article 14 was claimed/raised nor it was settled or decided
now as per my intusion the CAT is going to apply principles of res judicata in the present O.A. after severe agitation by respondent, while the present reinstatement is sought from a different period and right to equality is claimed as a recurrent greivance each time juniors are extended.hence cause of action is entirely different.
what can I do if CAT decides it against me although i have filed my protest and citations in favour. is it possible to apply res judicata against exercise of fundamental rights without going into merits of case, while CAT follows principles of natural justice and not CPC
sir is there any guarantee of fundamental rights if they are proved to be infringed and if no finding was given by court in earlier petition?
K.R.Rames
22 April 2010 at 10:12
I have served for 4 years and 6 months continuously in a company. Can I claim Gratuity? Is there any provision for claiming Gratuity. Please let me know.
Thanks...
Regards
K.R.Rames
mr_rames@yahoo.com
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
VALIDITY PREVENTIVE DETENTION LAWS
RESPECTED SIR, I HAVE A MOOT COURT PROBLEM, CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF PUBLIC SAFETY ACT[THIS IS AN ACT OF KASHMIR].UNDER THIS ACT A PERSON CAN BE PREVENTIVLY DETAINED. THIS IS ALMOST SIMILAR IN NATURE OF NATIONAL SECURITY ACT.I AM ON STATE SIDE AND I HAVE TO DEFEND THIS LAW. SO PLEASE PROVIDE ME MATERIAL IN MY SUPPORT.