Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
24 May 2009 at 12:44
dear experts,
my claint has a karocin distributer agency(holesaler).
nut shall district magistrate visit a local karocine sailler(deler) and asked him that how many oil you storage?and where you purchage it?
he told that 900 liter oil he has and he purchage it from my client"s agency,but actually he purcage 1700 liter from my client"s agency, and he fallsly told to d.m. that he purchage 900 liter oil only.however he sign.1700 liter purchage silip also, but d.m. without any query take action against my clint"s agency and stoped karocine supply,witout any cause.
whenever we ask to d.m.about this matter,d.m. donot say any thing.
nither d.m. is made any offance aginst my clint nor opening the supply.
what can we do?
A.Mohamed Thaheer
19 May 2009 at 23:01
What action could be taken against a Govt. Official who gives a false information under this act, while he was in service, and subsequently retired for the purpose of claiming penalty under the act?
A.Mohamed Thaheer
19 May 2009 at 22:24
Under article 226, of the constitution of India, the writ was allowed by quashing the CAT order, but on reading the judgment, there is clear apparent error on the face of record, and also the statutory rule under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 framed under article 309 of the Constitution has been com pletely ignored, and also without verification of the records and application of mind by the judge?
How this wrong judgment could be cured?
Whether the same Bench could correct the error knowing fully convinced that the judgment given by the Bench is wrong on the face of record.
pooja
17 May 2009 at 18:34
hello everyone,
could anyone suggest me book for Public Interest Litigation
thnx
hage nibo
15 May 2009 at 00:05
Lrnd. members,whether case citation not cited in w/petition can be cited during ADMISSION orally ?
And, if certified copy of judgement can't be obtained, 'mere citation' will serve the purpose ?
kumar
13 May 2009 at 14:54
iam joined in the indian army as soldier gd trainee in 2003. after 29 days of joining i quit from the training centre without the permission because of i cannot adjust the military life. when i was escaped from the military without the permission my training not started. sir i didn't recieve any communication from the army or police.can i know the reason for army not takin any action?.
sir i know that a job in the indian army is great honour. in that days when i was joined in the army my mental condition was going down.mentaly i was not able to adjust with that situations. one day i was very much depressed and left from the training centre. after that i suffered a lot. i recovered from that condition. and i decided to serve my country as a social worker. now iam serving people. people in my village and my party members saying to me to become a candidate in the next panchayathu election. is any problem to become a candidate.
now i am suffering a lot for the dicision i was taken in the the age of 19 without proper knowldge. to get discharge certificate from the army i have to face a court of inquiry and i have to stay in the training centre for a few days. to stay in the training centre is not easy. i will have to face ragging etc.
so can i know that have any problem to me to become a candidate in the panchayathu election without recieving a dismissal or discharge certificate from the army?.
AYYALASOMAYAJULA MURALI
13 May 2009 at 08:41
For all the members and experts a question
raised that issue of benefit of that before victimizing any body in the society or in an establishment has changed to some aspect : because ALWAYS ONLY THE INNOCENTS PUBLIC MEMBERS AND SMALL SIZING EMPLOYEES AND HOURLY/DAILY/MONTHLY WAGE WORKERS ARE GIVING MAJOR PERSONALITY IS THERE CHANGE OF LAW LIKE THAT OR ANY BODY IS INFLUENCING BEHIND THE CURTAIN FOR THEIR OWN SAKE TO CHEAT AND DECEIVE THE CONSTITUTION.
THE MAIN ISSUE OF GOOD FAITH IN LOYAL JUDICIARY MUST BE ENFORCED WITH FORE OF ALL DOORS FOR THE POOR AND LITIGANT AND WHO DO NOT KNOW LAW OF EQUAL JUSTICE AND FOR ENFORCEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS FOR EVERY SECTOR.
A POOR/BELOW MIDDLE CLASS ,BELOW POVERTY LANE WILL TRY GET OF HUNGRY AND NOT ANGRY ATTITUDE THIS MUST BE TAKEN TO CONSIDERATION OF EVERY LAWSON AND MUST HELP THEM FOR IMMEDIATE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AT SCI AND GET THE POOR MUST BENEFITED.
THEN THE EVIDENCE ACT 11 C OF INDIA OR ELSE WHERE CAN BE FORCED FOR QUESTION BENEFIT OF DOUBT ALSO RAISED TO MINDS OF ALL WITH GOOD FAITH NO POOR CAN BE PUNISHED
THE IMPLEMENTATION MUST BE FORCED BY LAW UNDER CRPC AGAINST THE CONCERN PL.
AS ALL THE HOURLY WAGE WORKER WHO WORKED RS 2 PER HOUR IN THE POSTAL DEPARTMENT AS CLASS.3 SUFFERED A BIG AND LOST NATURAL JUSTICE WHAT THEY REQUIRED AND NOW CRYING FOR THE 28Y EARS SINCE 1981 ON PAR WITH NO BODY IS TAKING THE ISSUE TO THE MAIN FOOT PRINTS AND GOOD HEARTS CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA FOR EARLY JUSTICE. KINDLY HELP US to get all the service benefits from date of joining all we have more than 300 day in each every from 1981 to 1988 but justice is far-way at bay of Bengal our posting we are under starvation as orphan for 8 years just for direct recruitment in the postal department no other employee in the department who recruited either for compassionate appointment or more than one hundred lower grade employees promoted to class. during that period the most unfortunate issue:
MURALI AYYALASOMAYAJULA POSTAL ASSISTANT
WALTAIR RS HO VISAKHPATNAM ANDHRAPRADSH
530004 MOBILE MO 09290016534/094923305
EMAIL ID : murali_viswanadh@rediffmail.com
A.Mohamed Thaheer
11 May 2009 at 17:04
A Public Information Officer furnishes a wrong information on the information sought for by the applicant. The fact of the false information came to know only after a year and very recently now. In the mean time, the PIO who gave the false information is retired on superannuation.
What action could be taken for claiming penalty for having furnished the wrong information, and what section of the R.T.Act,2005, .
Otherwise, How responsibility could be fixed against the erred officer? because this is an important evidence required to be produced to the court in a criminal case.
yogesh
07 May 2009 at 20:32
The Hon'ble Supreme Court has given judgement in case R.K.Sabhrwal vs State oF Punjab (1995) about the reservation roaster system and has specified that particular seat of certain category (GEN,SC,ST or OBC) will go to that category. For Example if SC Employee retires then seat will have to fill by the SC category only Similarly if GEN Retires the same will have to fill by the GEN seat
Further meaning of posts and vacancies are different
Dear Friends,
If any of you have more information about such allied cases which has been passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Hon'ble High courts then it will be please if you provide me the case name title and Date of judgement so that I can file for certify copies as I need it very Urgently
Regards and Thankyou in anticipation
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Why Share Autos cannot be banned?
No share Auto emits noise less than 50 decibel.. creating lot of noise pollution.
decibel is more than that of a earth moving machine.
Why those cannot be banned ?