Are Constituent Assembly Debates privileged talk or they are admissible as evidence in competent court for the purpose of interpreting the Constitution? I am referring to the following Constituent Assembly Debates: http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/debates/debates.htm
Ld counsels,
High Court passed a non-speaking order dismissing the writ appeal at admission.
Does this non-speaking order a valid ground for review.
Or will an appeal filed on this ground before the SC will once again be sent back for review to HC.
Please clarify.
Ld Counsels,
A writ petition was allowed by High Court. Then the respondent filed a Writ appeal under clause 15 of Letters Patent.
High court dismissed the appeal at admission level itself and a reivew of this dismissal was not accepted.
What is next step available for the respondet in Writ Petition.
Should the SLP before Supreme Court need to be against the order of Writ Appeal or againt the order of Writ Petition.
Please clarify. Thanks
What is the Concept of the Secularism with Reference to Indian Socio Legal Context?
The Hon Supreme Court had held in Union of India vs R Gandhi, president Madras bar association on 11-5-2010 that all tribunals should be transferred to ministry of law & justice to separate Judiciary from Executive. As held, functioning of DRT under Ministry of Fianance is unconstitutional. this message i am posting since some members wanted the citation.
While interpreting the Constitution, if there is any doubt or conflict between various parts of Constitution, is there any order of precedence between various parts of the Constitution? If we say there is no order of precedence, then why is the need to mention the exceptions under Part III? Example: Article 13(4) says "Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under article 368." In other words if there was no order of precedence, then the sentence of Article 13(4) could have been very conveniently mentioned in article 368 itself.
Despite Hon Supreme Court jdgmt that all Tribunals should be transferred to Ministry of Law & Justice, DRT is still functioning under Ministry of Finance. Is it not Contempt? If yes then who can file contempt case against Ministry of Finanace.
Article 21 has the phrase "personal" liberty and not "individual" liberty. What would have been the difference in the meaning for the purpose of interpretation, if it had been "individual" liberty instead of "personal" liberty?
Sir,
Please tell me, under which ruling compensation case can be filed against
below described university infinite delay in its working like declaration of results, examination schedule etc?
From where I can collect Act No. 1248(2)XVII-V-I-I-19-2000 ?
"Uttar Pradesh Technical University was established by the Government of Uttar Pradesh on 8th May 2000 vide Act No. 1248(2)XVII-V-I-I-19-2000 Uttar Pradesh Adhiniyam Sankhya 23 of 2000. Under the University Act, 'Technical Education' includes programmes of education, research and training in Engineering, Technology, Architecture, Town Planning, Pharmacy, Applied Arts & Crafts and such other programmes and areas that the central Government may in consultation with All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) by notification in Gazette declare."
Regards.
sk
postponement of BCI exm
Respected experts, pl let me know whether postponement of BCI entrance exam justified? The reasons given are that BCI could not send preparatory material in time and it expects greater participation from State Bar Councils. Whose duty was it to send them in time? How far it is correct to restrict one's right to Practice for almost a year? Is it not violative of Constitutional rights? How they are eligible to play with our career?