Ayusman Mahanta
06 November 2009 at 23:37
can fundamental right of a child(under 15yrs) be violated under article 21,19(2)and 39(f), if exposed to obscenity in print media? For ex Ajay Goswami v. Union of India.Can obscenity in print media so grave to children that it can raise a question on freedom of press.I need some strong points for moot court.
PJANARDHANA REDDY
04 November 2009 at 22:56
1. Hon'ble Shri K.G. Balakrishnan, Chief Justice of India
2. Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia
3. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarun Chatterjee
4. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Altamas Kabir
5. Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.V. Raveendran
6. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalveer Bhandari
7. Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.K. Jain
8. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju
9. Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.S. Sirpurkar
10. Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Sudershan Reddy
11. Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Sathasivam
12. Hon'ble Mr. Justice G.S. Singhvi
13. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Alam
14. Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. M. Panchal
15. Hon'ble Dr. Justice Mukundakam Sharma
16. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Cyriac Joseph
17. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Asok Kumar Ganguly
18. Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.M. Lodha
19. Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.L. Dattu
20. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Verma
21. Hon'ble Dr. Justice B.S. Chauhan
22. Assets of Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.N. Agrawal, since retired on 15.10.2009, on special request.
The above declaration of assets is purely on voluntary basis.
Ayusman Mahanta
04 November 2009 at 17:04
1.what is principle of uniformity?
2.under what proviso SC frames issues on matters of wit petiton under article 32.Is order 14,rule 1 of cpc applies to SC while framing issues,when petion is under artcle 32.
3.Is it mandatory for SC to accepts the persuasive authority of lower courts.
Pradeep
04 November 2009 at 12:14
Hi,
As per my knowledge, National song and NAtional anthem enjoy equal status in the constitution of india. but i am unable to trace the exact provision in the constitution or any other legislation specifically stating this. Government of India's official site also says that thsy enjoy equal status, but doesn't quote any legal authority for the same. (see http://india.gov.in/knowindia/national_song.php)
(Addendum - in view of recent fatwa issued against Vande Mataram)
Section 3 of the THE PREVENTION OF INSULTS TO NATIONAL HONOUR ACT, 1971 punishes individuals from preventing of singing National anthem, but it is applicable only for national anthem, but not the national song. unless we can quote a legal authority giving equal status to both, we cannot apply this section for preventing the singing of National Song.
Provisions of National Hounour Act -
s.3. Prevention of singing of Indian National Anthem, etc. Whoever intentionally prevents the singing of the Indian National Anthem or causes disturbance to any assembly engaged in such singing shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both
can anyone advise me upon the same..
Anonymous
02 November 2009 at 13:15
mr a is a bank officer and he is allegely inovlved in a bribe case and the matter was enquired in the cbi court and judgment came against mr.a and the bank dismissed him from service long back. at that time he was not paid anything and since then he is not getting any exgratia ftrom the bank. this happened eitht yearsback and mr. a also kept quiet as he did not want to extend the litigation and went for appeal in thigh court and the case is still pending
what is his right under constitutional law to live and maintgain his family without any source of income. he is neither getting any benfefit nor any pension he stuggled all these eight yers and without the kknowledge of thelaw and fear of inviting more problems and no guidanance to him as per constitutional law, has he any right undercontitutional alw to get back his benefits from thenationalised bank
kindly advise him and if possible please refer a good and famous advocate in hyhderabd
thank yousir
Anonymous
01 November 2009 at 00:47
What are the detailed aspects concerning the Elections in India ? ie. Who pays for the expenses for the center as well as the state elections which do occur of and on just due to the politics and for their benefits ?
Why should the people who pay the tax be victims of the politicians to pay for the same, through taxes, etc. ?
Who decides about the expenses ? and by whom are they made up ?
The above mentioned questions are being asked by Adv. Terrance, who is available at ad.terrance@gmail.com
Anonymous
01 November 2009 at 00:23
Now a days private news TV channals and print media are not following ethics of journalism.
Is freedom to media necessary in india?
Anonymous
31 October 2009 at 11:30
jaipur bench's judgment on scaling in RJS exam. Filing fresh petitions in similar matter after the judgment. how to tackle the point of delay in filing the writ.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
new education bill
i just want to know about ....The Right of children to free and complusory education bill...passed b our parliament..........that from when it will come in to operation.....................
and i need the copy of bill?
1- To what an extent govt canbe made liable to provide free educaton?
2-- What is the procedure to get the benefit of this law?
3- can the financial stable people also claim the right of free education for their ward?
---------------plz guide me as soon as possible...........its very urgent.........