ruchi
06 August 2009 at 17:28
whether high court has any jurisdiction to interfere in any order or decision of speaker of legislative assembly ?? if yes under which article and section... and if there has been a similar case like this
Diana
06 August 2009 at 13:41
Is article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution applicable in civil proceedings?
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
05 August 2009 at 23:27
HELLO ALL LEARNED EXPERTS
IF FATHER OF X DIED DUE TO CANCER DURING THE CURRENT TIME OF SERVICE WHETHER SON OF MR X IS ENTITLED TO GET JOB INPLACE OF HIS FATHER IF YES WHAT IS CRITEREA THANKS IN ADVANCE
RAKHI BUDHIRAJA ADVOCATE
03 August 2009 at 15:20
Dear all members,
One of my client filed cases under section 125 Cr.p.c. , 498-A/406 IPC. She had also filed a complaint u/s 156(3) Cr.p.c. for registration f FIR U/S 494/504/506/34 IPC against her husband. She was sufering in the courts for the last 10 yrs. Ulitmately she got expired on 02/09/07, leaving behind her two minor kids with her aged maternal grand parents. After the death of my client her father sufferred with hurt problem and ultimately, in Jan. the matter was tarnsferred to mediation cell, where by force & pressure the father of my client was to be agree on the settlement done by the mediator. It was agreed that the husband of my deceased client would submit Rs. 2 lacs for both kids as full fledged maintenance and the father of the complanant would withdraw all the cases. Now my querry is whether the father of my client can withdraw from this compromise done in mediation cell or not, as it is not confirmed in all the courts where the concerned cases are pending, as he is not satisfied with this amount. Because, the kids are of 15 & 14 yrs by their age respectively. And upto how much long they would spent this amount.
Plz reply as urgent. Thanx in advance.
Jithendra.H.J
01 August 2009 at 11:15
we are going to live only one life!we should do some thing big and worthwhile to our people/nation as lawyers. Gandhiji has said" let the profession never stand in the way of your public service" i hereby call upon the members of this fourm to do something in the following problem. The Election Commission already announced to hold the bye-elections to fill the 14 casual vacancies in the State Assemblies of West Bengal, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, , Uttar Pradesh and Meghalaya on August 18 of 2009. why this bye-election? because the Our politicians gave up with elected seat with absolutely no respect to the voters who voted them and We have seen few sitting MLAs contested for a MP seat (or vice versa). after winning they surrendered the MLA seat. Existing MP/MLA should not be allowed to contest for another election,before the expiry of their current term, which causes waste of our (public) money and government machinery to conduct the elections to their vacated seats. people say that to solve this problem 1) EC should not allow candidates standing from multiple constituencies 2)Existing MP/MLA should not be allowed to contest for another election 3)the person who surrendered the seat should bear all the expenses.
( this message is posted in forum also http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/messages/2009/7/7441_are_we_true_lawyers_.asp to get the attention of the members and the public once again i am posting here in this section, hope you wont mind)
*************************************************
HOPE THE TRUE LAWYERS WILL MOVE THE APEX COURT REGARDING THIS TO SERVE THE MOTHER INDIA AND TO SAVE THE INNOCENT CITIZENS AND TO MAKE OUR NATION A BETTER PLACE FOR THE NEXT GENERATIONS
**************************************************
Ziaur Rahman
26 July 2009 at 12:56
By virtue of the West Bengal Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act 1976,the juniors in the same rank belonging to general category were superseded in grant of promotion by their colleaguer belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes upon their seniors (of general category in gradation list) in feeder post by virtue of a 100 point roster preapred by the State Government. As a result the seniors were not only superseded in ranks but also started receiving less salary in comparison to their juniors who were promoted to the next higher rank .When the general category candidates were promoted to the next higher rank they were considered junior in that rank and were palced at the bottom of the gradation list below their SC/ST counterparts and are being less paid in their salay than their junior scheduled caste and scheduled tribe counterparts who had superseded them under the Act. What is the remedy before the employees of general category. Why the y should be discriminated twice by the ST/SC employees, once in rank and aother in salry and perks.Does not it violate the Constitution on the point of equality.What is remedy against this inequality?
Tarun Kalra LL.M, M.B.A
21 July 2009 at 06:15
hello sir,
how r u?
there is a case with me for section 125 or crps, i am from the side of respondent boy, the boy is not earning anything, i.e he is workless, and his father sold his parentel (ancent) land for rs 23 lakhs and made a fixed deposit of rs 4 lakh in the name of boy, the wife is living separtly from past 5 years and before 2 years he also took the boy son out of 3 sons of the couple, the father of respondent also submit rs 2lakh in the name of the boy with mother, now the women who was running a beauty parler may be closed the beauty parler or changed the place of work, we dont know, is demanding rs 5000 for herself and the son who is with her, on basis of cruelity and misbehave and demands of dowry from boy side, how we can avoid maintance liblty?
plz guide any authorities on workless boy?
TRIBHUVAN PUROHIT
15 July 2009 at 14:08
Dear Readers,
Please let me know the procedure of registering an assoication of persons working as arbitrators for various merchants.
Also please let me know about the procedure of registration.
Awaiting reply
Thanking you
Tribhuvan Purohit
tribhuvanempire@gmail.com
SRIPRAKASH BHATTACHARYA
12 July 2009 at 22:50
I SHALL BE OBLIGED IF THE LEGAL LUMINARIES MAKE IT CLEAR THAT IF IS WRITTEN AS "MEETING HAS TO BE HELD WITHIN 12 MONTHS FROM THE LAST PRECIDING MEETING (MEETING WAS HELD ON 13.07.2008)". DOES IT MEAN 12 CALENDAR MONTHS i.e. NEXT AUGUST 2009 OR 365 DAYS FROM 13.07.2009 i.e. WITHIN 12.07.2009.
REQUEST FOR DETAIL LOGICAL CLARIFICATIOS.
Sriprakash Bhattacharya
bhattacharyasriprakash@gmail.com
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
appointment of government pleader for courts
CAN A ELECTED MEMBER OF VIDHAAN SABHAA OR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BECOME GOVERNMENT PLEADER ALSO
CAN A MEMBER OF LOKSABHAA OR VIDHAANSABHAA OR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BE APPOINTED AS GOVRNMENT PLEADER ALSO
/