LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

deepika   05 April 2015 at 12:36

Dam construction of a state protested by the tribal people of another state

please help me out of this moot problem:
panchamuki river starts in kerala, flows through it for 160kms and crosses tamilnadu, runs through it for 285kms and empties into the bay of bengal. the state of kerala decided to build a large dam across the river at irungnalakuda. the project has already started and is awaiting clearance from central water commisssion, ministry of environment and forest and ministry of welfare. tribal people of five villages living on the banks of the river in the state of tamilnadu, fearing the consequences, formed an agitation committee under the "tribal protest forum" and filed a case against the state of kerala in the Supreme court challenging the dam project on the following grounds.
1. the dam project will cause ecological imbalance and violates their right to environment.
2. their livelihood is affected.
3. they will be displaced since the dam project will submerge their villages.
4. their place of worship will be destroyed and hence the project is violative of their religious right.
5. kerala's action is violative of the Forest Rights Act.


I HAVE TO APPEAR FOR THE RESPONDENT- THE STATE OF KERALA.
I HAVE MANY DOUBTS WITH THIS PROBLEM:
1.WHETHER A STATE CAN BUILD A DAM WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT?
2. IS THERE ANY CASE LAW TO BE CITED FOR THIS MOOT PROBLEM?
3.please frame issues for this problem for the respondent?

Mithun Sharma   04 April 2015 at 20:35

Is latest decision shreya singhal vs uoi of removing sec 66a it act has retrospective effect

is this decision has retrospective effect for old cases.

JUDGEMENT is in Attachment File

Gourav Modi   28 March 2015 at 20:14

Refund of donation

Can a donor of a political party claim refund under the Indian constitution?

tejaclinton   16 March 2015 at 16:05

Regarding dalit converts reservation

i belong to bc-c dalit christian i have applied under general category for upsc exam 2 times if i convert to hinduism will court give me sc caste status am i eligible for sc reservation jobs if i apply for upsc exams as sc candidate aftter attempting for 2 times as general candidate my parents are sc hindus

laxmikanth   14 March 2015 at 21:54

Municipality drinking water taps to residential apartments

Sir,

The residential apartment which is badly suffering with lack of ground water and purchasing tankers throughout the year continuously. however, some nearby individual houses are providing municipal water connections. The flat owners are paying municipal taxes, but the municipality is denying to provide water connections for each flat by saying they will provide only five connections to the apartment where 48 flats are constituted. Is it just and legal. The flat owners does have any right to get connections individually.

mumthasashraf   13 March 2015 at 21:07

Budget passed in kerala state assembly in the absence of speaker and deputy speaker, whether valid ?

sirs,

i have an important question to ask you all on the legal sanctity of a budget passed today in kerala state assembly.
today , finance minister km Mani was supposed to lay the budget on table. but, there was an accusation of bribery case against him. hence, the opposition has already said that they will not allow Mr. KM Mani to present the budget. As expected, today kerala assembly witnessed a lot of rotten scenes .Finance minister Km Mani and speaker were interrupted from entering to the house . but, finance minister came back on the second floor and read the budget from another MLA's chair and declared that the budget has been passed.
subsequently, the speaker, who was admittedly , not in the house, latter said that he has given permission to the finance minister to present the budget, in his absence.
secondly, chief minister also contented that finance minister has requested for the change of seat, from his regular seat to that of another MLA and he , in turn has forwarded the request to speaker and he has already allowed it also.
so, on these two points, the the budget is legally valid.
if the opposition prevents the finance minister and speaker from getting the budget passed, in such cases also, whether the procedures as laid down in legislative rules have to be strictly complied with ?
whether a slight deviation will make the budget invalid ?
if it is allowed, then every opposition will try this unscrupulous method in future .


SO, BREIFLY EXPLAIN THE PROCEDURE OF PRESENTING A BUDGET BY FINANCE MINISTER IN STATE ASSEMBLY ? AND , WHEN, MINOR DEVIATIONS IN THE PROCEDURES ARE ALLOWED ? HOW IT CAN BE PASSED, WHEN OPPOSITION PREVENTS THE MINISTER AND THE SPEAKER AT THE ENTRANCE ITSELF ?

ANY CASE LAWS ?

MUMTHAS ASHRAF

shrikant manjrekar   13 March 2015 at 05:41

Options against sic order

Hi experts,

pratik   08 March 2015 at 18:23

Stay on recruitment in department of posts by nonselected candidates

Dear Sir/ Madam

Dept. of Posts (DOP) conducted an exam for the post of PA/SA, RMS, PASBCO & few other GROUP C posts. The exam was conducted circle wise. MAHARASHTRA & GOA is a separate circle. The Exam had two papers Paper 1 (written) & Paper 2 (Computer Test). DOP conducted exam in May 2014 for Paper 1 & those qualified for Paper 2, were asked to appear at paper 2 in Nov 2014. This paper 2 was just qualifying nature & merit is based on Paper 1 which was a written test.

After that the DOP declared final result on 08 Jan 2015. But due to discrepancies in Paper 2 (computer test) marks due to some operational errors, DOP removed the result next day from its website. DOP came out with accurate marks & new list in February 2015. This new list has no errors & is still there on DOP Maharashtra website.

In the meanwhile some candidates who were having their names in first list & failed to appear in updated list, approached the Nagpur Bench of high court. Due to this (and also due to political pressure) DOP has not yet released joining letters of selected candidates. Non-selected candidates have put the writ petition on the basis of ARTICLE 226 claiming there are more number of Outside Maharashtra students in the list & exam should be conducted again.[Stamp Number: WPST/3541/2015 Filing Date: 20/02/2015 Bench Nagpur Status: Pre admission]


I would like to know if anything can be done to get the joining. Can we get joining by giving undertaking to DOP or should we admit a counter-case. How much time can this process take?

tanzilashaikh   05 March 2015 at 00:17

writ petition in case of t.ventaka reddy etc vs state of and

Please I want above case writ petition filed in behalf of petitioner and