LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

N.K.Assumi   03 September 2008 at 08:55

One shot Remand Order:

Is it competent for the Magistrate to passed an order of one shot remand of 60 or 90 days?

N.K.Assumi   03 September 2008 at 08:53

Oral Prayewr for Bail?

Can accused made an oral prayer for bail? or prayer for bail should be reduced to writing only?

ankit gupta   02 September 2008 at 23:03

evidence act

can any one give me detailed notes on oral and documenatry evidence.please mention the quotations of the supreme court on the same

sanjay kumar patibandla   02 September 2008 at 22:41

loss of promissory note.

I filed on case under section 138 of N I Act. The brief facts of the case r that, complainant got issued a legal notice and it was served to the accused. The cheque is for 25,000/- After receiving the notice accused sent a DD of rupees 7000/- to the complainant.

Debt is under promissory note. It is clearly mentioned in legal notice and complaint. But the complainant lost the promissory note. The above matter is coming for trail now. What to do now.
Please suggest me what I have to do with the help of case laws.

Anil Kumar kamboj Delhi M-9650   02 September 2008 at 18:15

helding of case Palwinder caur

Pls sir confirm to proper helding in the case of Palwinder caur

N.K.Assumi   02 September 2008 at 09:31

Section 497 IPC is unconstitutional:

Section 497 of the indian penal code read with section 198(2) CrPc is unconstitutional, do you agree?

sanjay kumar patibandla   01 September 2008 at 18:03

withdrawing the complainant.

I filed two cases u/s 138 of N I Act cases againast one person. The matter is settled before giving sworn affidavit.

Now we want to withdraw the cases. Is the petition u/s 257 of Cr.P C is maintanable to with draw case before taking considaration. if no what is the procedure to withdraw the complaints.

RAM   01 September 2008 at 11:26

Compunding under Cr.P.C at Appellate Stage

I am a public servant working for HPCL. I have been convicted in a case filed under Sec. 407 and 420 IPC. The case is udner appeal stage before a sessions judge. I am apprehensive about the judgement and wish to compund the case. Fortunately HPCL (Public Sector Undertaking) management is ready to compuind the case. As per prosecution charge sheet, HPCL is the party in respect of whom offences under the above section were committed. In this regard, i need your opinion on the following issues:

1. Under Sec 407 IPC, there is a maximum limit of Rs 250 (amount involved. In the entire case of prosecition, there was no mention of the amount involved in the crime. In such case who will decide the amount of money misappropriated ?
2. Who can compound on behalf of HPCL.
3. Can you brief about the procedure for compunding ? Please give some citations/judgements on the compounding at the appeal stage of the case.

ankit gupta   31 August 2008 at 23:21

delhi police act

can any layman ask a police officer to show his identity card before allowing him to inspect in any ways.
if yes then what a layman can do if the police officer denies for the same.



please also menation by which act or section this kind of power is conferred upon general people.


regards

ankit gupta   31 August 2008 at 23:16

evidence act

can anyone give me the meaning of evidence and its relation with other substantive and procedural laws in form of quotations under the english law or as quoted by the supreme court.

please provide in context to the latest information.

regards