Greetings for the day,
Sir I want to ask can a prosecutrix circulate and disclose her statements under crpc 164 by writing complaint letters to public authorities like district magistrate and chief minister and so on? She had filed a false case and the case is undertail. Is there any provision to bar her from naming and shaming me publicly. Pls help. Sorry for being anonymous extremely sorry
To All
Senior experts/professionals
Some days ago an anonymous person call me via phone that he is an employee of a bank and my ATM card deactivate and seeks my details for reactivate ATM card.
As I have no ATM card in that Bank at the moment of calling I understood it was a hoax call. So I cannot share my details.
My query to the senior experts/professionals is that: At this stage can this be treat as an offence under IPC and/or Information Technology Act and lodge complaint before nearest police station ?
Regards
Abhijit
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/ask_query.asp
To
All Senior experts/professionals
Some days ago an anonymous person call me via phone that he is an employee of a bank and my ATM card deactivate and seeks my details for reactivate ATM card.
As I have no ATM card in that Bank at the moment of calling I understood it was a hoax call. So I cannot share my details.
My query to the senior experts/professionals is that:
At this stage can be treat as an offence under IPC and/or Information Technology Act and lodge complaint before nearest police station ?
Regards
Abhijit
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/ask_query.asp
Four months before i was caught for using cannabis. Three of us was caught for this at same place, same time. But seperate fir was made against us showing different time and place. The seized thing was caught from the other persons bag. It was around 3gm. Actually i was innocent in this case. Only thing i did is i stayed in thier room when the police came. I told them i didnt use, i told them to take my medical. But they didnt do that. I was charged section 27b of NDPS act. When i contacted a lawyer he told me to pay the fine.
1) Why medical is not necessery before arrest in this cases. ?
2) Is there any procedure to be followed by police at the time of arrest ?
3) What are the chances of quashing this fir ?
4) Will i get any govt job if i pay the fine. ?
Is it possible to charge false cases by this section, by imposing a small amount on people by the police itself ?
I am so depressed, i think my future is destroyed.
The Society in Mumbai levied fine on me claiming I questioned secretary on irregularities.
Secretary claimed this as defamation and they put fine in GBM.
The fine amount is 25000/-.
Does society/secretary have power to levy fine for defamation ?
What are my options ?
1.A registered legal notice was posted and “report track consignment” was got from the site of Indian Postal , in which it was stated “Item Delivery confirmed”
Date is written on its left corner 25.05.2021 (date of taking track “report track consignment” from the postal sight) and below at the end of report, it is written
“https://www.indiapost.gov.in/_layouts/15/dop.portal.tracking/trackconsignment.aspx”
Whether it is treated Original Document or Secondary Document ?
If Original, no problem, it can be exhibited. If not whether Certificate u/s 65 B Evidence Act to be submitted for getting this exhibited.
Or any other remedy?
2. TDS deducted, but no TDS certificate issued by borrower. So Provisional Form 16A was got from Income tax site.
On left upper side it is written this is provisional TDS certificate
Or right upper side it is written “https://services.tdscpc.gov.in./ser/tapn/prvsnlTdscer.xhtml
Below at the end of page is written:
*Kindly note this is provisional TDS certificate, Final TDS Certificate will be provided by Deductor
Below that on right hand side written date and time of getting this one from the Dept sight.
Whether it is treated Original Document or Secondary Document ?
If Original, no problem, it can be exhibited. If not whether Certificate u/s 65 B Evidence Act to be submitted for getting this exhibited.
Or any other remedy?
3.
Form 26AS , Annual Tax Statement under Section 203AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961
See Section 203AA and second provision to Section 206C (5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 31AB of Income Tax Rules, 1962
The above can be got only from the sight of Income tax by the deductee assessee of Income tax Department sight.
Whether it is treated Original Document or Secondary Document ?
If Original, no problem, it can be exhibited. If not whether Certificate u/s 65 B Evidence Act to be submitted for getting this exhibited.
Or any other remedy?
Thanks with Regards
Respected Experts,
can a Lawyer write my complaint on his letterhead and submit it to the SHO?
or I have to write my own complaint and submit it?
dear sir/madam ,
1) may I know what acknowledgment I can request for my complaint if police officer do not prefer to Fill FIR .
2) and also sir/madam, please let me know types of registering the complaint in case FIR not filled or preferred and what documents police officers needs to provide to us following complaint registered . Thank you .
Hello,
High court has dismissed our criminal writ petition, without considering applications filed for placing on record some important documents and taking those documents/annexures on record. Both the applications are still pending and one of them still shows a next date for hearing, even though the main matter was dismissed.
The applications contained important documents such as letters and memos of the state government explaining the rules and the law regarding the matter, to the competent authorities.
Due to the applications containing such vital information, there has been gross injustice to us while deciding the writ petition.
What should we do? Should we file an SLP in the Supreme Court asking for a direction to the High Court to hear our matter again, while considering our still pending applications and taking on record the annexed documents in the applications?
What if the Supreme Court dismisses the SLP? Would we have any legal recourse after that?
Sorry for being anonymous, but it is important.
Thank you.
340 crpc read with section 195 ipc
can lower court has jurisdiction himself to summon accused u/s 340 crpc read with section 195 ipc