LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Somnath mukherjee   12 April 2009 at 13:58

482 Filling

My wife filed a case u/s498a,313,506,34 I.P.C against me and my family in kalyan court u/s 156(3) on 22-2-2007 and case was subsiquently rejected by the Ld.C.J.M on the grund of jurisdiction.After some days my mother-in-law files another case u/s498a,323,326,328,313,315,148,457,147,427,504,506,120B I.P.C against me by colouring the same cause of action and upon the same court by supressing the previous one.The police has already filed a chargesheet but the charge is yet to be framed.Whether this case is tenable? Whether i can file quashing? Which one is better for me? Please suggest some relevent case laws.

A Truthseeker   11 April 2009 at 19:57

capital punishment and its abolition

death sentence is awarded in rarest of rare case.but so far as man is concerned is there any case that can be termed as rarest of rare? our scripture enjoins each soul is potentially divine. dacoit and ghoul Ratnakar was so corrected nay transformed that he became the greatest poet to compose Ramayan.incarceration for the rest of the life would not do instead of death?

Jitendra Raval   11 April 2009 at 15:58

Negotiable Instrumennt Act--Bearer Chque

The accused handed over two cheque to the complainant which was singed but without payee name and date,amount etc in good payment for payment of insurance premium in 2002.

There were few financial transations between the two but nothing was due. When relation between the two spoiled, the complainant filled up the blanks and lodged the cheques in 2008 which was bounce as the account was inoperative after some time after his transfer.

The complainant filled the blanks but forget to strike bearer and hence these cheques remain bearer when presented for payment and returned unpaid.

My question is "Whether the bearer cheques covered under S.138' If not kindly provide me the citation.

Or it does't metter the cheques in question was bearer or order.

Kidly reply

anju jain   11 April 2009 at 10:26

138 b negotiable instruments act

Dear all,
what would be the outcome of the cases about to conclude trial after Harman Electronics (P) ltd Vs. National panasonic India ltd. as it is having retrospective effect.

vinod bansal   10 April 2009 at 22:46

Discrepancies/contradictions

Dear All
Kindly provide me any citation for aquittal of the accused on the law point of material contradictions in statement of witnesses.Thanks

vinod bansal   10 April 2009 at 22:44

Recovered articles not converted in sealed parcels

R/All Members
I m representing accused persons in a case us 398 IPC in which knives/weapon were allegedly recovered by police from accused persons but these were not converted in sealed parcels by the police/I.O. this fact is also admitted by I.O. in his cross,plz avail me some citations on this law point its urgent Thanks in advance..

sajed   10 April 2009 at 17:18

Quashing of F.I.R

one of My client got bail under section of 498(A).other 5 accused absconding . can i file petition before Andhra High court for quashing of F.I.R.? Or i have to file petition after getting regular bail of 5 absconding accused . what i have to do ? do it before arrest or after arrest?

manish   10 April 2009 at 13:33

cheating and fraud

Accuse was left india with his family, after making cheating of 20 cr, with his business collegues the complaint was lodge against EOW Mumbai, father of accuse gone for anticipatory bail which is pending in session court of mumbai, what is the remedy for recovering the amount and how to trace the accuse

mahesh verma   10 April 2009 at 12:40

illegal bandh called by political party

the high court mumbai imposed penalty on the shiv sena and bhartiya janta party for calling illegal bandh in mumbai in 2004. I could not find the judgment and date of judgment. Please help me if you have the judgement and date of judgement, convey it to me

Ranganath   09 April 2009 at 21:46

FIR registration

Ld counsels,

What should be mentioned in the FIR when there was a related complaint filed by the father of the complainant and the same was withdrawn.

Can this be called first information. There is a one month gap between the first complaint that was withdrawn and the second one.

Also kindly clarify if I need the certified copies of the first complaint and statement that was withdrawn for filing quash petion on the second complaint/FIR. There are contradiction between the first complaint and the second compliant in the allegations.

Please clarify. Thanks.