LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

vinod bansal   22 January 2009 at 20:58

An unique query regarding a criminal complaint

Hi every one
plz help me in this matter facts of the case are as under:-
My friend started a zym(fitness club)in a rented premises,after some time there was a dispute in between my friend (Tenant)& his landlord regarding rent & upon this my friend filed a civil suit in civil court & succeeded in getting permanent injunction thereafter landlord approached sessions court by way of appeal against this order & their appeal was accepted than my friend approached to highcourt & filed a civil revision on dt. 16-10-2008 but landlord by the help of Supdt. of police forcibly & illegally kicked out my friend on 18-10-2008 (during the pendency of civil revision in highcourt but there was no any stay order in favour of my friend as the revision was in initial stage at that time) from the rented premises & the belongins/articles/exercise equipment,machines were looted by the men of the landlord now after refusal of police to iniate any legal action against accused i.e. landlord my friend have to filed a criminal complaint uss 395/323/452/506 etc. in CJM court & it is fixed for preliminary evidence in febrary 09 now problem is this,all looted articles/machines of my friend are lying in a secret place of landlord but my friend know that place,he wants to place it as evidence before magistrate,problem is that now magistrate is recording preliminary evidence of complaint (.e. my friend)what process my friend have to adopt to prove recovery of his looted items,is their any provision of local commissioner or receiver as in civil cases in crl cases.my friend wants to got recover his articles from the possession of landlord(accused of his crl complaint)police cannot help him as now the matter is pending in the court,now sole question is that how complanant can got recover his articles from the possession of landlord or place this fact as evidence before magistrate in his complaint..plz help its urgent

chiterrekha kala   22 January 2009 at 18:45

Pre litigation matter in lok adalat meeting hall

Is there any Act against the finance company where they called their client for settlement of default loan a/c.

But Bank officials are warning in the premises of Lok adalat to the concerned client of Bank to take the Non balaible warrant thru court in presence of so many people.

Interestingly there is no Lok adalat/Govt official is present, only Bank official was there..

Suggest appropiate action.

Apurva Kumar   21 January 2009 at 22:35

can cr.p.c amendment Act' 2008 b challenged?

Can the proposed Cr.P.C amendment Act of 2008 be challenged before the Apex Court/supreme court of india.

Apurva Kumar   21 January 2009 at 22:31

F.I.R. information!

Do fir comes under the perview of R.T.I can a victim seek information of his investigation in the particular case?

kanwar Lal   21 January 2009 at 18:31

Negotiable Instrument Act

customer issued 6 cheques to the non banking financial corp, but all cheques were dishonoured due to reason insufficient funds. there are different memo reciepts along with each cheque. can we use 6 cheques in a single complaint u/s 138.

vinod bansal   20 January 2009 at 22:21

sentence to a juvenile offender in a murder case

Sir
what sentence can be awarded to a juvenile offender in a murder case by principal magistrate of juvenile justice board........Minimum & maximum PLz Help its Most Urgent....Thanks

vipul vakharia   20 January 2009 at 22:18

prevention of creulty to animal act & Animal preservation act

Animals are seized from the truck , there was no permit for carriying the cattle & without complying the neccesary provision of law. The accused has filled petition to take interim custody of cattle pending inquary . The pajarapole has a rights to be heard before passing any order by judicial megitrate if yes under what law ? as an advocate of welfare body like pajarapole do not want to give inturim costody to bucher .what should be the arguments.

Jainodin shaikh   20 January 2009 at 15:11

Proceeding u/s 125 Cr.P.C.

In a proceeding u/s 125 of Cr.P.C. stage is for defence evidence. Non applicant filed his affidavit. It his affidavit some important points and point related with documents filed by the non applicant are not mentioned by mistake of his council. But those point are very impportant for the defence of the non applicant. QUESTION: Is it possible for the non applicant to be called or recalled himself as a witness? Is there any case law?

Jainodin shaikh   20 January 2009 at 15:10

Proceeding u/s 125 Cr.P.C.

In a proceeding u/s 125 of Cr.P.C. stage is for defence evidence. Non applicant filed his affidavit. It his affidavit some important points and point related with documents filed by the non applicant are not mentioned by mistake of his council. But those point are very impportant for the defence of the non applicant. QUESTION: Is it possible for the non applicant to be called or recalled himself as a witness? Is there any case law?

Jainodin shaikh   20 January 2009 at 15:10

Proceeding u/s 125 Cr.P.C.

In a proceeding u/s 125 of Cr.P.C. stage is for defence evidence. Non applicant filed his affidavit. It his affidavit some important points and point related with documents filed by the non applicant are not mentioned by mistake of his council. But those point are very impportant for the defence of the non applicant. QUESTION: Is it possible for the non applicant to be called or recalled himself as a witness? Is there any case law?