Anonymous
18 September 2023 at 01:09
Respected Sir/Madam,
I have been falsely implicated in a counter blast FIR U/s 8 & 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012 in the state of Jharkhand. Till date I am any how managing to evade arrest.
My Anticipatory Bail Petitions have been rejected by the Hon'ble Sessions Court, the Hon'ble High Court and unfortunately even by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. A Non Bailable Warrant has been issued against me.
I have not filed Quashing Petition U/s 482 of Cr.P.C. before the Hon'ble High Court yet which, I consider was desirable before approaching the Apex Court for Anticipatory Bail.
In above mentioned conditions, how many days tentatively I have to remain in Custody IF I SURRENDER BEFORE THE COURT AND PRAY FOR REGULAR BAIL.
And, also be kind enough to guide that whether a Quashing Petition will be tenable before the Hon'ble High Court?
I shall remain grateful to you always.
A L ANTONY
16 September 2023 at 13:40
sir
my wife and i have sb accounts with two seperate banks in mumbai.
in the month of february 2003, our accounts were hacked and rs. 300000/- was siphoned off. two lakhs from my wife's account and one lakh from my account.
the crime was reported to both banks the very next day. a fir was also filed with cyber cell of mumbai police. the banks refused to entertain our claims to refund the money on the arguement that they have followed the due procedure. after disputing for a long time i filed a complaint with banking ombudsman by sending copies of the copies of complaint made to banks and a copy of fir.
the ombudsman was kind enough to finally give its orders to my banker to refund rs.91000/- which the banker did promptly.
however, the ombudsman based on the submission made by the bank and without hearing me, passed orders that the bank has taken due care in the operations in my wife's account, and the bank is not liable to refun d the money and closed the case. the ombudsman was kind enoungh to state that their orders was non-appealable. they also advised me that i can move against the order in appeal with any consumer forum or any other legal recourse. I am a at a loss of rs. two lakhs.. since the banking ombudsman closed the case, the bank says they will not be able to help me in the matter.
two pints to be considered : the operations in the accounts were similar. but one account got a refund and the other did not any refund. in fact, i may state, my wife's banker did not follow the guidelines issued by rbi.
my request, therefore, is whether i can approch any consumer forum or have any other legal remedies.
I would appredciate an early reply.
A.L. Antony
antonyal@gmail
PS: I ahve not yet subscribed. i can do so if you can give me details.
Anonymous
15 September 2023 at 08:58
A person, has been taken into custody on a false POCSO case.
My queries are -
1) Is it correct to assume that Bail application should Not be filed, before period of 14 days, as it this may reduce chances, of securing Bail
2) Whether the Bail application should state the relevant merits of the case as well as the criminal background of the opposite party filing the case. Or the Bail application should only focus on this specific case.
3) Whether the Bail application already filed can be suitably revised, if some points are not properly covered. If it cannot be revised, how can the other merit points be included, before hearing date.
Thanks a lot experts.
professional
15 September 2023 at 08:51
A person, has been taken into custody on a false POCSO case.
My queries are -
1) Is it correct to assume that Bail application should Not be filed, before period of 14 days, as it this may reduce chances, of securing Bail
2) Whether the Bail application should state the relevant merits of the case as well as the criminal background of the opposite party filing the case. Or the Bail application should only focus on this specific case.
3) Whether the Bail application already filed can be suitably revised, if some points are not properly covered. If it cannot be revised, how can the other merit points be included, before hearing date.
Thanks a lot experts.
Anonymous
12 September 2023 at 21:42
if there is section 153 A of IPC and session court has convicted and high court has acquitted the accused what will be further procedure to proof him guilty in supreme cout please answer
Dr.SAAIE KB
11 September 2023 at 01:19
A sessions trial court has ordered in a CrMP (Document Petition seeking to allow the letter from PIO under RTI Act to be considered as evidence in pending discharge petition u/s 227 CrPC) to prove the genuineness of PIO letter but allowed the CrMP. But Section 23 of RTIAct prohibited courts of any proceedings on any order under RTI Act. On the other hand, summoning witnesses of accused in discharge petition is also not permissible(PIO in this instance). That means the accused cannot prove the genuineness of PIO letter. Now the accused wants to bring this legal infirmity on record of the case and ensure that the PIO letter is considered as primary evidence in the pending discharge petition. How to file a fresh petition seeking the relief of exemption of proving genuineness of PIO letter.
I shall be grateful to the learned community for guidance.
Thanks
Sai KB
Anonymous
08 September 2023 at 21:14
what will happen if criminal appeal against IPC 338 is dismissed. Does the accused sent to jail immediately or will he get sometime to go to high court.
Vasanth MS
07 September 2023 at 15:26
Respected Sir/Madam,
When I see the case status in ecourt (tamilnadu), under Sub Maters section, I see something like CRLMP/xxxx/2023 (numbers replaced with xxxx for privacy). Case is going on, but I dont know what is CRLMP under Sub Matters. Will be thankful If I get any information about CRLMP.
Thanks a lot
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Corruption
If a complainant transfers a money to the government servant thru., phone pe or goggle pay , or thru., bank whether it amounts to acceptance of bribe?