Shailesh Hiralal Shah
19 June 2014 at 12:48
Dear sir,
I am retired person - 63 years.
At the age of 38 yrs. with Blue Dart Express Ltd. Leading courier company, upon their un -justifiable and wague allegation , they have suspended from my services. Matter referred to Labour court and is in my favour ordering to re-instate me on my same post with continuity of service.
At high court, - also ordered to petitioner company to re-instate and to-day matter is pending for back wages issue.
Gratuity order was in my favour but again company has filed petition and pendoing and clubed with original matter.ordering of Rs.1.50 lacs. + interest.
IN PF company has altered date of Joining and retirement in their interest for which police complain is done & waiting for their reply.
Even to-day company is not in position to prove their allegation and L.C has given order in my favour stating that the steps of suspension & simplicitor termination is illegal and wrong .
Now For defamation where should I apply ?
How much stamp duty be paid on amt. of Rs.1.00 lacs. ?
Should I go for Crime defamation where I save stamp duty ? Whether beneficial ?
Whether the matter resolved immediately ? Normally how much time it takes for conclusion ?
I expect your guidance as I am retired and all my savings I have spent in legal expenses etc.
Please help and guide me for.
If any proper lawyer you pls. suggest.
Thanks.
Shailesh shah
amitagrawal
22 June 2013 at 15:58
I quit.thanks.i took the forum in wrong sense.
Adv M.D.Azhar
22 June 2013 at 10:07
sir, i want to know that in the mater of sec-138 of N.I. Act, after taking the evidence of complainant is it necesary to examin the banker or there is no need to examin the banker?
Kunal Sarkar
21 June 2013 at 22:02
A police case was registered under section 376/511 of IPC against Rabi who is abscond from the date of incident.
The said offence was committed in a Hotel and at that time two more friends are present in the Hotel along with the victim and accused person. Police recorded statement of the victim u/sec. 164 of cr.p.c. in which the victim stated the name of her two friend.
During investigation police arrested the Manager of the Hotel.
I filed a bail petition before session judge u/section 439 of cr.p.c. and accordingly police produce case diary before court.
The session judge after perusal of case diary and my submission directed the IO to record statements u/s 164 of cr.p.c. of two friends of the victim and posted bail application after 10 days.
Now my question is that,
1. whether the session judge can direct the IO to record statements to any particular witness under section 164 cr.pc., if so under what provision.
2. whether its amounts to interference in the investigation and influence/directing the Investigating agency to investigate the case in any particular manner.
3. whether such type of directing can given by the session judge to consider a bail petition.
4.whether this order can be challenge in the High Court and can i filed separate bail petition in the High Court on this ground.
5. Whether such order of the session judge is illegal.
6. what relief i give to my client.
A Truthseeker
21 April 2013 at 20:52
OM
India as per preamble is a socialistic country. in socialism the money is to be evenly distributed. it is heard that in China the salary of a professor and a day labourer differs by a single rupee.this is possible being socialistic.
our check on unrestricted income is by imposition of income tax. some of our industrialists have assets a few lakhs crores rupees. they are virtually running parallel govt. at the cost of poor people. the natural produces are being hoarded by them instead of being got distributed by the govt. if one starts incoming from this day in how many years he would amass a few lakhs crores of rupees with payment of income tax?
Anonymous
24 December 2011 at 21:01
a man was charged with 302, 120 ipc and 3sc/st act,as he could not be arrested police put up challan under 299crpc, the court took cognigance and commited the case to sessens court, later on accused surredered in the court and sent to j.c now police wants p.c. for further investigation, what is the legal position. can police seek p.c. in this case
ayoob
24 December 2011 at 11:27
SIR,
I AM SICK LADY AGED 55 CONVICTED IN 138 BY LOWER COURTS ORDER: CHEQUE AMT 2.5 LACS PLUS 4 MONTHS CONVICTION, NOW AT HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT RESERVED. IF I PAY THE CHEQUE AMT.THE PUNISHMENT WILL BE SET ASIDE ?
SHANTI BAI
NOTTAM VENKATASAMY
18 December 2011 at 12:14
WHETHER APPEAL OR REVISION LIES AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SESSIONS JUDGE IN DISCHARGE PETITION FILED U/S 227 OF C R P C?
A Truthseeker
10 July 2011 at 19:40
regarding rape we know that it is held that where in a murder, a body is destroyed, in rape the soul is degraded and the victim has to face an uphill task to survive against public disdain who look down upon her.
but is not the case more deplorable in the case of child abuse, whose unconcious mind gets totally upset and it is in all probability that the child would never recover to a healthy personality?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Will & executor
Om
The testator died 10 years back appointing two executors and three heirs/beneficiaries out of 4 heirs. the probate proceeding has been recently initiated. one of the heir is contesting the probate proceedings.
The beneficiaries are in need of developing their dwelling house. the question is whether the executors can apply for sanction of new building plan and loan from bank before the probate is granted and probate proceedings is over.