Arup
01 April 2013 at 13:18
Sir,
At the outset I beg to u to give me the opportunity for showing my gratitude to this website for such opportunity to individual regarding the allotment of vistas for resolving of complex matters of legality . Sir, my question is that I work under Govt. of Tripura as a Clerk. I ranked among the batchmates and I receive the same salary as my juniors get. I have got promotion in the moth of October,2006. I was offered to give my option to either A or B regarding fixing up my basic pay. The option A is meant to confirm fixation date as on 01.01.2006 which is the date of commencement of the pay review effect . Whereas my juniors who have opted B is meant for showing a ratification regarding fixing up of their basic pay right from the date of promotion which is 1.10.2006. Now in this process , my basic pay is calcullated at a reduced rate than that of my juniors who have opted option B at the time of promotion.
Meanwhile , there is an option of Stepping up in the RoP 2009 ,Govt. of Tripura and that is meant for alleviating the basic pay of senior in order to make it equivalent to that of the junior in the possible case of receipt of one increment for being at the existing post for a period of ten years and then receiving promotion followed by the receipt of such increament by a junior in the subsequent year of promotion by the senior. This is in comparisn to the case of senior who gets promotion before expiry of ten years.
Under the above circumstanc is it legal to seek for redress from the department by requesting first to make necessary adjustment of the basic pay of the senior equivalent to that of the junior by stepping up of basic pay ?
Here the notable fact is that both the senior and junior have entered into the service as lower Division Clerk in same date. The seniority list is determined on the basis of merit list made by the public service commission of the State. The case of such difference has occured in the promotion to next post in the same date,month and year after a service tenure of 6 years by both of them. The main reason for such difference is due to choosing of options.
Anne W
09 February 2013 at 08:28
I am a non Indian female and want to settle in India for ever.
What are my options for a) Buying real estate and do some tourism related business for earning money for living expenses + profit. b) Job and c) Marriage.
PL. guide or provide appropriate links for migration laws of the country for which I will be thankful to you all.
mouraly
06 February 2013 at 20:36
I am an advocate and also I am a PF Consultant.
My client running a business, he has his our employees and also he is giving some work outside his premises, like home based stitching or trailering work. very specifically telling that the employer has no control or no supervising over that trailers. my client have below 20 numbers of employees. MY QUESTION is my client establishment is not coming under PF coverage. whether I have to contribute those workers like tailers without my supervising. In ESI it is exempted, In PF I need detailed explanation with suitable case laws or provisions.
Junior gets salary higher than that of a senior in the govt. service
Sir,
At the outset I beg to u to give me the opportunity for showing my gratitude to this website for such opportunity to individual regarding the allotment of vistas for resolving of complex matters of legality . Sir, my question is that I work under Govt. of Tripura as a Clerk. I ranked among the batchmates and I receive the same salary as my juniors get. I have got promotion in the moth of October,2006. I was offered to give my option to either A or B regarding fixing up my basic pay. The option A is meant to confirm fixation date as on 01.01.2006 which is the date of commencement of the pay review effect . Whereas my juniors who have opted B is meant for showing a ratification regarding fixing up of their basic pay right from the date of promotion which is 1.10.2006. Now in this process , my basic pay is calcullated at a reduced rate than that of my juniors who have opted option B at the time of promotion.
Meanwhile , there is an option of Stepping up in the RoP 2009 ,Govt. of Tripura and that is meant for alleviating the basic pay of senior in order to make it equivalent to that of the junior in the possible case of receipt of one increment for being at the existing post for a period of ten years and then receiving promotion followed by the receipt of such increament by a junior in the subsequent year of promotion by the senior. This is in comparisn to the case of senior who gets promotion before expiry of ten years.
Under the above circumstanc is it legal to seek for redress from the department by requesting first to make necessary adjustment of the basic pay of the senior equivalent to that of the junior by stepping up of basic pay ?
Here the notable fact is that both the senior and junior have entered into the service as lower Division Clerk in same date. The seniority list is determined on the basis of merit list made by the public service commission of the State. The case of such difference has occured in the promotion to next post in the same date,month and year after a service tenure of 6 years by both of them. The main reason for such difference is due to choosing of options.