nilesh satelkar
29 March 2025 at 14:32
Respected members,
Does final order of maintenance automatically cancels the interim maintenance order?
Also recovery of arrears amount from interim order is applicable after the final maintenance order?
Anonymous
29 March 2025 at 13:19
The tenant had rented out ground and first floors of a commercial property, through a registered rental agreement. He is vacating the ground floor now, while he vacated the first floor merely after 1 year of the tenancy. We want to mention that on paper as well.
What all needs to be put in writing, and should it be on stamp paper of a certain value, and in presence of witnesses? Thanks.
Raubuch Colwell
29 March 2025 at 13:06
It all started when I needed to rent a car for an upcoming trip. After browsing through various options online, I came across a company called Rental24. Their website looked professional, the prices seemed reasonable, and they were offering a fantastic car that seemed perfect for my month-long rental. The process appeared straightforward, and everything seemed legitimate. However, there was one condition they required a hefty deposit of $5000, which seemed a bit high, but I thought it was typical for premium rentals. Trusting the process, I went ahead and paid the deposit. I received an email confirmation and a rental agreement, and everything appeared to be in order. But as the days went on, the red flags started appearing. When I tried to reach out for more details and final confirmation, my emails were ignored, and my calls went unanswered. When I finally managed to get a response, it was vague and unhelpful. Then, without any warning, their website disappeared, and the phone number they had listed was disconnected. It became clear that I had been scammed. My $5000 was gone, and I had no car to show for it. I was devastated, unsure of where to turn next. After a few days of feeling lost, I began researching ways to recover my funds. That’s when I found RAPID DIGITAL RECOVERY. I read testimonials from others who had been scammed and successfully had their money recovered with the help of their team...Email: rapid digital recovery (@) execs. com .. I reached out to RAPID DIGITAL RECOVERY, shared the details of the scam, and explained what had happened. They took immediate action, investigating the company and tracking down the scammers responsible. The team at RAPID DIGITAL RECOVERY was incredibly professional, and they kept me informed at every stage. They worked tirelessly and, after some time, managed to locate the scammer behind Rental24 and recover my $5000. Thanks to RAPID DIGITAL RECOVERY’s expertise, I got my money back. They provided me with peace of mind during a stressful time and helped me avoid a financial disaster. If you’ve ever been a victim of an online scam, I highly recommend reaching out to them. Their support was invaluable, and they turned what seemed like an impossible situation into a success.
Telegram: h t t p s: // t. me / Rapiddigitalrecovery1
Anonymous
29 March 2025 at 05:51
he husband filed for divorce,
The wife submitted details of the expenses incurred by herself and their son. She also expressed her willingness to accept permanent alimony from the husband. The husband filed an affidavit agreeing to pay permanent alimony to the wife and son. However, he later withdrew the SLP orally. Consequently, the Supreme Court dismissed the SLP.
At this stage, what action should the wife take? Please clarify.
raju
28 March 2025 at 13:34
The petitioner and respondent entered in settlement compromised outside the court in pending civil case ongoing as petitioner was under pressure from as respondent very influence and approachable within local limits as well with police. Query is requested from experts that can respondent advocate in court dictate or compel the petitioner to give statement as per his whims and choice. Please advice in the interest of justice and law.
Anonymous
28 March 2025 at 12:47
Im Plaintiff in civil suit, defendant advocate file purshish for settlement. Settlement Amount mention in that purshish also mentioned that settlement terms n conditions files on next date with cheque of settlement amount. I'm also sign on that purshish.
Now defendant draft settlement terms as his convenience which is not suitable to me also amount as mentioned in purshish I'm not happy for the same.
I want to know whether it is possible to reject purshish amount as well terms n conditions mentioned in settlement letter. And it is possible to run suit as usual at same stage of cross of defendant. Im ready to take Cross of defendant.
Pls guide n help as I'm appear as party in person
M.Kapoor
28 March 2025 at 07:15
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to seek clarification on a legal matter. My son and I jointly own a property. We were in the process of selling this property and received an advance payment from the purchaser, which was deposited into my son's bank account.
The purchaser has now canceled the deal and is demanding a full refund. However, my son is unwilling to provide the refund.
I would like to know who would be held liable by the court in this situation: my son (who received the advance), both of us, or some other party.
Thank you for your assistance.
Best regards,
M. Kapoor
at your mercy
27 March 2025 at 16:48
Dear learned advocates, first my salute to you all. The sub registrar though is inclined to release the document, he is cautioning me that I may have issues later as it may not come in EC. I find with my little knowledge, the new doument read along with previous deeds as refrenced technically correct to have clarity on the plot that has been conveyed. Please go through the following and advice. Thanks I recently purchased a plot from a seller. The seller provided both the original document and a rectified deed. The rectified deed clearly specifies the plot number, survey number, CMDA layout approval, and detailed boundaries. In the new purchase deed, the schedule mentions a new survey number (210/51) and new current patta number (22977),which was obtained through the patta issued to the seller a few months ago. The boundaries, and total area remain consistent with the details in the original document. However, the old survey number (210/4) is not mentioned in the new deed. Both the original document and the rectified deed are referenced as previous linked documents. Details from the previous document (Schedule B): Plot Number: 47 in "SASTRI NAGAR" Survey Number: 210/4 Location: No. 82, Varadharajapuram Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Chengleput District Extent: 2170 square feet Exact Measurements: East to West (Northern side): 27 feet East to West (Southern side): 37 feet North to South (Eastern side): 50 feet North to South (Western side): 60 feet Boundaries: North: 30 feet Road South: Plot No. 48 East: 30 feet Road West: Plot No. 46 In the new purchase deed, all these measurements and boundaries are accurately reflected, except that the old survey number (210/4) is replaced by the new survey number (210/51) and includes the updated patta number (22977).
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/new-sale-deed-237427.asp
Prakash Joshi
27 March 2025 at 14:40
Friends,
Can anyone share the legal position or cite any SC judgement regarding amendment in the notice or complaint filed for dishonour of cheque u/s 138. Is it allowed or not and upto what stage of proceedings,
Thnaks
P C Joshi
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Writ petition.
I am very glad to file a writ petition in chennai high court to get Ponneri Police station footage.
Can I file a writ petition party in person.