srinivsa rao
18 January 2013 at 13:40
dear panalists,
i and my friend did data transfer business during the time for his immproper function i stoped my businesss with him we had an agreement which was singed by another partner of my friend i gave him a cheque for security which is a firm cheque of mine but he filed a case u/s 138 ni act showing the same as my persnol loan buthe also executed a recipet admitting that he recived fifty thoused rs from me on behalf of his company another point the plaace of transation in the complaint is one and croos examination is another as per the version of cross examination the trail had no jursidition please guide me.thanking you sir.
vasantha
18 January 2013 at 10:56
My friends divorce case is going on for the past 4 years since feb 2009. First few years after filing a counter respondent didn come to court at all and at the time of exparte order, came with setaside request. Five months back, they came with a mutual consent offer. My friend was called to their lawyers office, where he has conveyed a possible amount of 5 lacs as one time and their demand was 25 lacs or 10 lacs as initial and 10k on a moonthly basis. She doesn have any issues and is financially very sound, but is not working. After this talks, court ordered to settle and come, but they have not come with any positive reply. Since, he doesn have a good support from his lawyer, I request anybody to suggest him how to proceed further. this is really dragging and divorce was seeked on the basis of mental harassment when she quaralled for 8th time and left for her mothers house and has not responded back to any of my friends call and filed a false complaint in police station of trouble by inlaws and so on (which made my friend taking a decision of keeping her away)
Tripti Nagwekar
24 August 2012 at 15:22
Dear Advisors, nephew A together with his uncle B have a piece of land in ancestral say 1000 sq. ft. and the name of nephew A and uncle B are registered on 7 / 12 index. When A proposed to sell half portion i.e. 500 sq. ft. of his share without dividing total land of 1000 sft because division of land takes 3 years by government, uncle B refused nephew A to sell his share to outsider and tried to offer only Rs.10,000/- ten thousand for A’s share of land and at the same time outside party was offering me Rs.400,000/- to nephew A. So ultimately nephew A sold his share of 500 sqft to outsider buyer for Rs.4 lac under section 44 Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and outsider party i.e. buyer put Rs.100,000/- one lac on sale deed to avoid more stamp duty and registration fees. One the same day nephew A and buyer registered the agreement. After one month uncle B filed case against A and requested the court to cancel the sale deed and to allow uncle B to buy 500 sqft from the buyer at Rs.1 lac mentioned on sale deed under section 22 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. On the basis of court the tehsildar has not put buyers name of 7/12 index. Further can nephew A and outsider buyer request the court to value the sold land at current market rate say Rs.6 lacs as civil suit is going on for past 2 years? Now please advise nephew A what the court would do in this case? What are the outputs? What are the ways for nephew A to come out?
sanjay Upadhyay
10 September 2010 at 15:06
whether fresh examination in cheif can be filed by the complainat after cross is over on the same points which he has been already cross examined . But not in reexamination
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Registeration of property within laal lakhir in punjab
Sir/Madam,
In Punjab, sale of land holdings bearing khasra numbers are registered, and those within the laal lakhir (or laal dora) which is residential area of a village, it is not registered, and sale deed is executed between the parties on a non-judicial stamp paper and notarized.
Above is the general practice and procedure prevalent since long. A notarized sale deed was sent to an Australian University recently, and they want to know under what Act/Rule, sale of property within laal lakhir of a Punjab village is not required to be registered.
Please advise. Thanks and regards
Gurdev Singh Grewal
9779509107