LCI Learning
Master the Basics of Legal Drafting in All Courts. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Anonymous   27 October 2009 at 23:37

kya will ghar bethe bana sakte hai

kya ghar bethe will ban sakti hai. mere dada ji vakil ke pas nahi ja sakte. kya me sare document ghar par lakar unse aur kitne witness se document par signature kara sakta hun. aur ye kya legle will to mani jayegi. ek will banwane me kitna kharch aata he. mere dada ji delhi me rahte hai.

Chintu   27 October 2009 at 23:21

Partition Issue

Hi All,

I have bought two properties in 2008 Oct and Nov respectively. My Question is related to Partition Agreement and transfer of rights.

The two properties was an ancestral property to Party A and Party B , but the land was in the name of Party B;s father as he was the elder son of the family at the time off the demise of Grandfather of Party A's and B's . I have bought the land from Party A 2.27 Acres and Part B 1.22 Acres respectively in Oct & Nov 2008. These agriculture land had been partitioned by revenue authority the Tahsildar office in 1989 and the Tahsildar office has passed the order then to get the Katha created on Party A and Party B with their respective Share of land and both parties have agreed to the same and got their Katha certificates and RTC documents. (The Land was initially written on the name of Party B's Father. As he was the elder son of the family). In 1997 as the land prices has gone up. Party B filed a suite in Civil court objecting to the partition order passed by Tahsildar office (Tumkur) Karnataka, India. Court has upheld the partition order of Tahsildar and Dismissed the petition of the Party B.Again in 2007 he has filed a fresh petition claiming the ownership of the land based on the old documents which was in his fathers name. we had less knowledge at the time of my purchase of these lands. One of the broker got us both the lands as they were adjacent. When we bought the land we checked all the records and they were paying taxes and RTC along with Katha was in Party A (2.26 Acre) and Party B (1.22 Acre) respectively and we registered both the lands as per the records they had and the Katha has been transfered to my name along with RTC. Now I have converted the land from District Commisioner to Residential purposes. Recently Party B came to know that I have bought Party A's land and he wants to give an objection or may be move the court to stop registeration process of Party A's property.

Need help in understanding what rights Party B has on Party A's land and how can he create trouble in the registration process.

Thx..

Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate   27 October 2009 at 22:45

Sec 56 (2) what is the clear mean ?

Dear learned Friend,

What is the mean of the Sec 56 (2) under Electricity Act 2007 which is as follows:-

Sec 56
2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no sum due from any consumer, under this section shall be recoverable after the period of two years from the date when such sum became first due unless such sum has been shown continuously as recoverable as arrear of charges for electricity supplied and the licensee shall not cut off the supply of the electricity

Explain it in your own applicable of mind:

Anonymous   27 October 2009 at 21:51

Home Loan

Hi,
I have to apply for home loan to buy a flat.
What is the best approach fixed or floating? why?
which bank should i prefer?

LIC housing loan
SBI
PNB

P.C. Joshi   27 October 2009 at 21:26

MOU

Dear Friends,

Can anyone provide draft MOU wherein a foreign party grants exclusive selling rights to Indian party to sell its products in India.

regards

P.c. Joshi

manoj   27 October 2009 at 21:23

djs

is there any amendments in delhi judicial service rules after 2007?ifyes,provide notifications details.

Anonymous   27 October 2009 at 20:39

Section 143(2) of ITAct 1961

Sir,
I have filed my IT return for AY 2008-2009 (FY 2007-2008) on 31/07/08.The IT return is assessed and refund order is issued by respective ITO on 29/05/09 and cheque on 30/06/09.Due to my personal reason I could not deposit the same with my bankers, and requires revalidation.
(1) Recently I received a notice dated 24/08/09 from ITO under section 143(2) asking me to be present in his office along with documents, accounts and other evidence in support of my return. I am of the view that notice is “TIME BARRED” as it is not issued within time limit of 1 year from the date of filing the return as per section 143(2)
(2) Once the return is assessed, and refund order issued, is it right on the part of ITO to issue such notice? Is it legally right?
(3) ITO in his letter has mentioned that “This case is selected through CASS”. What is CASS? And if selected through CASS can it overcome all legality of following prescribed procedure of 12 months time limit?
(4) Can challenging the notice come in a way of revalidating my cheque as stated above?
I hope to receive valuable guidance from you all.
Meanwhile thanking you in anticipation.I feel The query is open and not resolved as indicated at the top right hand corner.
Sincerely yours,
ABC

Jibanananda Goswami   27 October 2009 at 20:39

RTI

Can I ask under RTI act for the transaction details of an NGO that runs on Govt. Grant? As I heard, more than Rs. 12 lakh was taken out from the bank account in the first month after release of the Govt. Grant. There is no proper account of that money. please see my query http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/experts_message_display.asp?group_id=42171 about that account.

yogesh   27 October 2009 at 20:29

trust

1)what is a sole trust?
2)can sole trust be formed for immoveable property?

Legal Fighter   27 October 2009 at 19:26

Wife Filing 498A, DV and still willing to live?

Wife has filed 498A and DV and in reply to divorce petition, she puts all the counter allegations of cruelty and states that she is still willing to live with her husband. Isn't it conradictory stand on part of wife as 498A is cruelty is of such an extent that wife can't be expected to live with her husband. Is such a desire of the wife genuine?

Husband has filed divorce based on cruelty and desertion and he has disproved the allegations made by wife in 498A and DV.