Hardeep Singh
03 September 2009 at 07:13
SIR, WE WERE MARRIED AROUND 11 YRS BACK AND WE HAVE 09 YRS OLD SON. THIS YEAR JANUARY WE TOOK DIVORCE THROUGH MUTUAL CONSENT AT MUMBAI. AFTER DIVORCE WE REALIZED THAT WE HAVE DONE VERY BIG MISTAKE IN LIFE AND WE WANT TO REMARRY WITH EACH OTHER. NOW WE ARE RESIDING AT PUNJAB TOGETHER WITH OUR SON WITHOUT PERFORMING ANY MARRIAGE CEREMONY.
Q.NO. (1) CAN WE RESIDE TOGETHER BEFORE PERFORMING MARRIAGE CEREMONY/ COURT MARRIAGE ?
Q.NO. (2) WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE FOR COURT MARRIAGE WITH SAME LIFE PARTNER ?
Q.NO. (3) WHICH LAW GIVES GUIDANCE IN THIS CASE ?
Q.NO. (4) CAN COURT MARRIAGE BE PERFORMED WITHOUT CARRYING MARRIAGE CEREMONY AT HOME, IF YES, WHAT WILL BE THE COST ?
Humendra Gupta
02 September 2009 at 21:30
I am representing a huge complex where the builder has broken all rules and laws and cheated us.
Need professional help in Mumbai who can help us take the builder to task
i.e Filing a criminal complaint that the builder has not got OC for over 4 years after building is complete. further violated all building plans, misutilised the funds (maintenance amount) and cheated the occupiers
TANMOY
02 September 2009 at 20:25
Hi, I need a copy of this judgement. Can any body tell me where I can get a copy of this judgement.
( 1997 (1) Crimes 55); 1996 (3) Crimes 385 (Mad) = 1996 (4) CCR 92 (Mad).
malashree
02 September 2009 at 19:39
will typed on a plain paper with signatures of testator and witness has it validity in the court of law.
Sandeep
02 September 2009 at 19:31
Can you plese provide me a draft of Indemnity Bond in respect of arrears of Land Revenue. Elaborating further, an individual wants to avail loan from a bank on mortgage of land for which land revenue is outstanding - pending a litigation. The bank is demanding an Indemnity bond for such arrears of land revenue. Please provide me a draft of the same
Shivasurya
02 September 2009 at 19:05
company liable to pay Rs.7,00,000/- to the complainant as per the MOU between the company and the complainant. complainant filed case u/s.138 against a director only as the alleged cheque contains his signature not included the company and other directors. But at the time of MOU, the accused in the said case is not a director of the company and he never signed in the MOU. I need relevant judgements of Supreme Court and Highcourts to save the innocent director of the company from the case.
G. Shivasurya, Advocate, Chennai
bala
02 September 2009 at 18:53
Hi,
I own a small piece of land in T.Nadu & is let for cultivation. The cultivating tenant has not paid any rent for years and now has issued temporary and permanent injunction notice for me not to enter the land ?
Is this valid ?
How do I counter it and ensure the temporary injunction is NOT granted ?
Pls. reply.
Thanks
Bala
nachiket
02 September 2009 at 18:48
Facts in Brief :-
I am a person residing at Indore (M.P.) . I have booked 6 tickets for tour to Europe for me and my family with a travelling agency at indore at their office. The booking for the tour was done by me at their Indore office. All the payments were made at Indore office. All the correspondence were made and guidance were received at Indore Office only. The terms and conditions was also signed by me at Indore . The company is having their head office at Mumbai.
Query :-
At the time of booking , I have signed the ‘terms and conditions’ wherein it was mentioned that :-
“ It is agreed between the parties that in the even of a dispute or difference between the parties the exclusive jurisdiction shall vest in court / forum / tribunal in Mumbai alone having jurisdiction to decide the matter.”
I have filed the case at district consumer forum at Indore. The company have submitted case laws to show that the jurisdiction of the consumer forum is at mumbai due to the terms and conditions signed by me.
kindly help me and supply / intimate the case laws/ supporting etc. for it to have the jurisdiction at consumer forum , Indore where the cause of action arose.
Its urgent please
Regards and Thanks
nachiket
Indore
Rajneesh Madhok
02 September 2009 at 18:08
RTI APPLICATION REPLIED BY PUTTING BACK DATE BY PIO ON FILING APPEAL TO FAA
I filed an RTI application on 13th July 2009, which had been delivered to the CPIO on 15.07.09. Any how we add five days in the date of delivery that will come out to be 18th July 2009. On getting no reply from the PIO, the First Appeal had been made to FAA on 19.08.09.
On 31.08.09 I received the reply by an official of the concerned department not mentioning his designation. He signed the reply as For Sr. Divl. Comml Manager, *****Name of Town. The concerned official is not PIO or FAA according to the website.
The PIO played the game by sending reply dated 18.08.09 which I received on 31.08.09. The reply made by ordinary pos. No seal on the envelope has been put by postal department. Neither at the place the envelope had been posted nor the place of delivery of document. The Postal stamps affixed at the back of the envelope has no seal.
Now the question is that.
1. Whether my First appeal that has been made on 19th Aug will be considered or not. Though I have documentary evidence of posting.
2. Whether I will have to file second appeal once again as I am not satisfied with the reply sent by the concerned official.
3. Should I make complaint to CIC.
4. How can I prove that the information that I received actually on 31st Aug 2009.
5. The PIO has sent reply on OIGS envelope. Whether we should make the enquiry of posting of that letter with evidence.
6. Our postal department is also funny. It does not put stamp.
7. Now the point is the proof of delivery.
8. What will be the intention of the CPIO to send reply after due date and putting back date on the replied letter.
Rajneesh Madhok,
B-xxx/63, Nehru Nagar,
St. No. 2, Railway Road,
Phagwara
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Resolution by Parent Company
Hello,
Whether a Parent Company in India can pass a resolution on behalf of its 100 % Wholly owned subsidiary in Africa.
Waiting for your replies,
Amit Karia