Atish
06 September 2009 at 22:45
What is the possibility of a mobile conversation present or past be recorded or encrypted in any way(maybe through the services of a detective) by the petitioner for a family court matter and would it have a stand in the court as evidence against the respondent.
Regardsriven
arpita shah
06 September 2009 at 21:11
Respected members,
Looking forward to form a charitable trust. Can u plz let me now, how to start for it, like application to be made for registration, where to submit the documents and wot documments are essential to be submitted for formation of a charitable trust, how many people etc.
I shall be very thankful to u as am seriously intersted in starting a charitable trust.
Thankin u!
Yours sincerly,
Arpita Shah
Manoj Kumar
06 September 2009 at 20:57
dfdasfafsafsafafasfafadfasf
Sachin Bhatia
06 September 2009 at 20:48
What remedy is available for a person, against the 25 days delay in the delivery of speed post, in which a bank draft was sent for the treatment of a relative who was died because of the delay by the postal department. while there is exemption for the post office in sec 6 of THE INDIAN POST OFFICE ACT. is there any reference case...
Jibanananda Goswami
06 September 2009 at 20:14
If the Chairman is not willing to call the general meeting even the time limit is crossed and due to this delay, the financial status of the society forces it to suspend the activities then what can the Board of Management do? Is there any process to call the meeting before 16.09.09? otherwise the society will be finished.
Most of the members are willing for meeting but Chairman is not calling it for his interest
Sumit Lal
06 September 2009 at 20:14
A proprietorship firm represented through its law officer, a power of attorney holder files the complaint U/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The said power of attorney happens to be an Advocate who has not surrendered his licence.
My query is
(1) whether the power of attorney is valid?
(2) Whether can the power of attorney holder represent the proprietorship firm as a complainant?
(3) Whether the complaint will be maintainable?
Anish Kumar Ojha
06 September 2009 at 20:07
Hiiiii... I am a CA final student.Will it help if I do BA LLB and that too from Delhi University...
Krishnan Venkatachalam
06 September 2009 at 19:33
"X" an individual availed housing loan from a nationalised bank and the house property was Mortgaged to the bank till the repayment of loan."X" defaulted in payments and the bank issued notice to the borrower that it will auction the property. In the meanwhile "X" housing property along with some other properties were attached by the Income tax department. The bank which had given loan to "X" auctioned the property after giving due intimation to the IT department and issuing public notice for auction.
The question is whether Income tax department will have priority over the bank ( secured creditor ) in taking the sale proceeds of the auctioned property. The bankers claim that they have preference over the IT department quoting SARFESI Act. However some of my collegues say that the borrower is an individual and hence bank can not claim priority over IT department quoting SARFESI act which will be only applicable to borrowers who are company incorporated under companies Act.
Kindly clarify as to who will get priority over the sale proceeds of auction whether bank or IT Department.
Krishnan Venkatachalam
06 September 2009 at 19:32
"X" an individual availed housing loan from a nationalised bank and the house property was Mortgaged to the bank till the repayment of loan."X" defaulted in payments and the bank issued notice to the borrower that it will auction the property. In the meanwhile "X" housing property along with some other properties were attached by the Income tax department. The bank which had given loan to "X" auctioned the property after giving due intimation to the IT department and issuing public notice for auction.
The question is whether Income tax department will have priority over the bank ( secured creditor ) in taking the sale proceeds of the auctioned property. The bankers claim that they have preference over the IT department quoting SARFESI Act. However some of my collegues say that the borrower is an individual and hence bank can not claim priority over IT department quoting SARFESI act which will be only applicable to borrowers who are company incorporated under companies Act.
Kindly clarify as to who will get priority over the sale proceeds of auction whether bank or IT Department.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
New B.M.C. Tax Revision in Mumbai for licensed properties
IN THE CASE OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
The B.M.C. has revised the tax structure in a very harsh manner in Mumbai for properties given on Leave and License. The tax is very high. I believe that it is subjudiced and has to still be decided on.
In caes the society is demanding it on behalf of the B.M.C. and the Property owner refuses to pay, could any action be taken on the property owner or it could remain pending till the final decission by the B.M.C.
Also whatpercentage would according to you on residential property tax be levied and how would it be calculated as far as expenses also incurred by the prperty holder.
Regardsriven