bnraj
01 August 2009 at 18:50
What is the share of a married womwn married in 1965 out of ancestral property
kiran
01 August 2009 at 18:13
Hello Sir/Mam,
I am undergoing a divorce and currently the case is at the stage of Cross examining the Petitioner(Myself).
Issue : On the day of cross examination in front of the Commissioner(Lady advocate), the Respondent(My wife) was present but their lawyer was absent. Subsequently, there was no cross examination and the commissioner wrote a letter saying due to absence of Respondent's lawyer the Evidence is being closed.
And I signed on the same letter, but Respondent refused to sign the same.
Question: Hence, I would like to know
1. Can we use such action to our advantage
2. If this action of Respondent and their lawyer could be favourable in my case.
Also, please let me know your suggestions on proceeding further.
Thank you in Advance.
sandeep chavan
01 August 2009 at 17:19
Can anybody provide me useful material on Co-op Housing society bye laws.
Regds
RAJDIP DAS
01 August 2009 at 15:54
CAN PARTNERSHIP FIRM MAY FILE CASE ON BEHALF OF ITS UNIT ?
Tipsy
01 August 2009 at 15:46
Housing Soceity can charge interest only on Maintaineance fund and Not on repair fund on defaulting members ?
Housing Society can charge interest on Building repair fund which has not been recd from members, as defaulting member say you can charge interest only on Maintaineance fund and Not on repair fund
What society should do , they should charge interest on delayed fund on maintaineance as well as charge delayed fund on building repair and renovation fund ?
kranthi kiran
01 August 2009 at 14:37
Original Extent of the Land in the Sy.No. as Per Khasra Pahani is 17 Acres. Original Owner has all ready sold away the land to my client. The Original Owner in collusion with the revenue authorities has fradulently changed the extent of the Sy.No from 17 Acres to 24 Acres and thereafter obtained the Title Deed for the same. Later on he has sold away the above extent also to various persons. The revenue authoorities with out any application of mind have effected the mutation and granted title deeds to purchasers. My client having came the knowledge of the same has filed the application before the RDO. RDO has cancelled all subsequest mutation proceedings. The sub subsequent purchasers have filed the appeal stating them selves as bonafide purchasers. How to defend the case.Quote some citations in this regard if available.
ramesh
01 August 2009 at 14:09
sir, after dishonour of the cheque, the complainant issued legal notice to the accused by way of ordinary post, certificate of post and registered post. but the acknowledgment was not received. but after lapse of stipulated time, the accused issued reply notice denying the notice contents. basingupon this reply, though the complainant has not received postal acknowledgement, filed complainant u/s 138 NI act. and calculated time after deleting 15 days grace period from the date of reciving reply from accused.whether this complaint is within stipulated time or barred by limitation? plz xplain me. thanQ sirs......
ramesh
01 August 2009 at 14:07
sir, after dishonour of the cheque, the complainant issued legal notice to the accused by way of ordinary post, certificate of post and registered post. but the acknowledgment was not received. but after lapse of stipulated time, the accused issued reply notice denying the notice contents. basingupon this reply, though the complainant has not received postal acknowledgement, filed complainant u/s 138 NI act. and calculated time after deleting 15 days grace period from the date of reciving reply from accused.whether this complaint is within stipulated time or barred by limitation? plz xplain me. thanQ sirs......
kranthi kiran
01 August 2009 at 13:43
Sir What is the fate of the bonafide purchaser who has purchased the joint family property from the father. After taht father died.Later on the suit is filed by the minor son represented by his mother. Inspite of the contest, the Suit is decreed in favour the minor. The sale deed executed in fabvour of the baonafide purchaser is not cancelled. Based on the decree, the revenue officails have canclled the mutation in issued in favour of the purchaser. Now what the bonafide purchaser can do.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
property sgare of hindu woman married in 1965
An ancestral property was sold for Rs 1200000 in the year 2006 and was distributed Rs 425000 each between 3 borthers but not given any thing to two own sisters.But one of the sister who was married in 1965 is now filed a suit against my father claiming equal share.
by virtue of present law state and central laws whether she suceed in suit are we become liable to pay the equal share ?