T.V.Ramana Rao
12 August 2009 at 22:17
Whether the private institutions come under RTI Act or not
T.V.Ramana Rao
12 August 2009 at 22:08
A person who is working either in private sector or in Govt. sector can enroll as an adocate to practice. To my best of knowledge, it is not posiible, but i would like to know whether my stand is correct or not
jayachandran
12 August 2009 at 20:45
Dear Experts
I have a question. please answer with any citations, if available
A Chief Judicial Magistrate issued warrant appointing an Advocate Commissioner to take possession of a property, under Sec.14 of the SARFASI Act. The period mentioned in the warrant expired and not executed by the Advocate Commissioner
Can the CJM revalidate the warrant by extending the time retrospectively -or-
the CJM has to issue fresh warrant.
Similarly, whether the CJM can suspend the execution of warrant for say, one month or two months, for any reason. Is the CJM has the power to do so.
Kindly reply
I will be thankful and the answer will help me
jayachandran
12 August 2009 at 20:39
Dear Experts
Chief Judicial Magistrate passed an order issuing warrant to take possession under Sec.14 of SARFASI Act.
Can the experts give valuable suggestions about the remedy available to the person against whose property warrant was issued.
1. Whether Crl.Revision before the High Court under Sec.482 Cr.P.C. is proper -or-
2. An application to vacate the order before the CJM is proper
Any decision-reported, if cited, I will feel happy.
N. K. Bansal
12 August 2009 at 20:09
Friends,
Please advise me whether the taking over the maintenance of the flats by the housing society will have any adverse bearing on the rights of the flat purchasers to claim pending work done by the builder or the claim of damages under consumer forum. The flats in a 13 floor tower were purchased during construction in Mumbai and also occupied by us. CC was also obtained by builder. Certain work is pending like podium construction for car parking, ground flooring, gas installation etc. Registered AD letters were also sent to them for such pending work duly acknowledged by them. Builder is only assuring but nothing seems to be done. Society has been regd. shortly but no Ist general body meeting could be held as per rules even after expiry of 3 months of registration. Please guide if starting maintenance by society, if compelled by us will not have any adverse effect on our rights against builder. N.K. Bansal
pavan
12 August 2009 at 20:06
i am llb 6th sem student looking for more study.now practis in lobour. tell me right way right coures to provaiding me job next tow three year.plz rply
KOUSTUV DEY
12 August 2009 at 19:20
I would like to know whether ECS bounces are under the purview of NI Act or not. If they are not then how banks are filing cases under NI act.
Manish Singh
12 August 2009 at 14:03
Dear Members,
if a court dismisses an inventory filed as being incomplete and the order does not specify any other things and while the argument, he refuses to grant any further time for filing, what are the remedies available to us in that kind f situation. the amtter is under the probate of will.
Thanks
manish
Praveen
12 August 2009 at 13:41
Dear Experts,
I worked for a multinational company for 2 years & 2 months. As per my appointment letter, on resignation, i'm required to serve 3 months of notice or pay my basic salary in lieu thereof. After i submitted my resignation, the employer insisted that i work for 2 months. But, i could not. i served one month of notice period and paid basic salary for the days not served. I've joined another organisation after my last working day there. My previous employer is now sending communication that i'm not relieved from the organisation as yet, and asking me to report to work. After my last working day, i have submitted all dues, documents, and other formalities my self to immediate supervisor. I've also given them cheque for my notice pay. Pls advise the way forward. Are there any implications from my side ?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
m case of defamation
hello all learned experts
i have lodged claim case u/s 500 of ipc against father in law who sent letter having written abuse words regarding the character and another things abusive now this case is on the stage of evidance the letter sent to m y client by her father inlow having zerox copy and only one paper sent original now when i take the chief exmaination on that time for the converting the secondary evidence ( zerox letter) into primary evidence i have to ask to compalinat after showing that is this ur father inlaws handwriting and u identu it if she says yesit will be exhibited am i right ? if differ inform thanks in advance