A Truthseeker
24 July 2009 at 00:20
Sex energy is given to man by the Nature for propagation of human species. the concommitant enjoyment is a device of the Nature like taste of our tongue. like tongue's taste faculty whose main purpose is to maitain our body if we use our eating habit arbitrarily our health is bound to fail. as the reasoning capacity of human being is infinite vis-a-vis animal the sex impulse in animal is controlled by the Nature Itself but in case of human beings the man himself is to put the reins. to indulge in unbridled sex is to go against Nature's plan.
Harsh
24 July 2009 at 00:04
Hello,
I am 21 years old, HINDU by religion and SINDHI by caste. I'm having an affair with a girl, relative of mine, who is also 21 years old. She is my FIRST COUSIN ONCE REMOVED i.e, my FIRST COUSIN's daughter (MY FATHER's ELDER SISTER's SON's DAUGHTER).
My question is that, Can i marry her??
Experts plz help me out.
Thank you.
Vishal jain
23 July 2009 at 23:48
Hi all
I am having a matrimonial dispute with my wife. She has filed a false 498a/406 against me in which she has clamied that she and her parents have spent more than 16 lakhs. Out of which she has clamied that her parents has given gold ornaments worth Rs.5,00,000 /-.
Just to prove my inocence, I filed one TEP against my-laws and request the Income Tax department to check if Rs. 16 lakhs was there in there files by that time of marriage.
Now, from reliable sources I came to know that there was not this much amount as claimed by my wife at the time of marriage. The Income Tax officials told me that there is some explained and some un-explained money by her so called claimed dowry list. The Income Tax officials that they has issued on demand letter to my in-laws also. They also told me that they have submitted a final report of 150 pages to CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX against the complaint and hence the complaint is closed now.
For this, I filed an RTI application to the income tax department, but they refused to provide me the reply U/s 8(1)(j) "not in public interest"
I filed 1st appeal to appeal authority, but the same reply has been given.
Now I want to move to WRIT PEITION to the high court by myself as I am financial not strong. Can I file a WRIT PEITION against the IT department and how?
Sujit J Pathak
23 July 2009 at 23:41
Summons has been issued by an MM court u/s 138 of N.I Act and has been sent through court. The said summons has been received by wife of accused, Now the M.M magistrate refuses to issue warrant against the accused stating servicce of summons is not proper as its received by wife of accused. Kindly provide citations of releavent judgements
Vishal jain
23 July 2009 at 23:33
Hello,
I am having a matrimonial dispute with my in-laws as I have been pushed in a false 498a case.
Now, From reliable sources I came to know that all the phones(land line & mobile) they are using, has been on fake IDs, means they are using those phones having fake IDs.
Please help me as to what judicial/non-judicial action(s) can be taken against them and how ?? so that they can be f***ed
Y V Vishweshwar Rao
23 July 2009 at 23:24
Dear Friends please verify and suggest the way out !
Father & Three Daughters (and wife) are a unit of HUF and holding vlauable Joint Family/Ancestral properties in several places . Father is suffering with mental disorder and he is in hospital since few years .
1-Whehter the Elder Married daughter( as Defined as Coparcener with equal rights that of son) can become the Kartha of the HUF and as HUF Kartha can sell the HUF proerties to impliment the Sale agreements executed by her father while he was in Sound and disposing state of mind .
2- Whehter Elder Married Daughter, as above , can represent the mentally effected father, in a Sale deed to be executed by her as Kartha / Adult member of HUF for herself and unsound Mind Father and HUF minor Sisters - with out any Cout permisison ?
Narasimha swamy N
23 July 2009 at 22:15
is there a time limit to file a suit for redemption to redeem the suit property.can it be filed even after 30 years as specified in Limitation Act?
vinod bansal
23 July 2009 at 22:15
R/Members
In a complaint case in which three accused are mentioned by name,20 are mentioned as others ,is it possible to convict three person under sections 395/149 ipc in such position,plz suggest.Thanx
A Truthseeker
23 July 2009 at 22:01
Ld.Friends,
i wd b obliged if u kindly give me the step by step procedure of the referred section with reference to concrete examples. that is from the commission of a crime to filing of the charge sheet.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
everithing about caveat
kindly let me know about caveater/tee;there rites/limtations etc. how to vacate the caveat petition? also kind enough to submit case/s.