Murugesh
27 June 2009 at 19:14
Dear sir,
We are doing a turnkey project and we have only above supervisor catogery staffs in our company. In this situation which insurance is better to our employer as well as employee. Is workman compensation act or Personal accident?
Is workman compensation is mandatory?
Please explain.
Satyanarayana Romala
27 June 2009 at 18:57
I have passed LL.B recently. I want to enroll as an Advocate. May I join as a Legal Officer in a Pvt.Ltd.,Company. I am seeking your valuable advices. Please advise me as early as possible.
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
27 June 2009 at 17:57
sec.378(i)&(iii)(After Amendment of Year 2005)-order of acquittal passed by a magistrate in a cognizable and non-bailable offence -Appeal against by complainant in sessions court lie or not ?
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
27 June 2009 at 17:47
Criminal complaint alongwith application u/s. 156(3)-Conclusion of magistrate that police inquiry was not requried in this case -He directed to complainant for examination of himself and his witnesses -whether any illegality committed ?
Member (Account Deleted)
27 June 2009 at 16:04
Can someone furnish me the following citation (ENTIRE JUDGEMENT)
2007(2)MLJ(Cri) 1907 Mad Ramasamy & others V/s State represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police CCIW(gd) CUDDALORE
Unnikrishnan
27 June 2009 at 15:01
Dear Members,
I understand that when an agreement/document is executed outside India for which the stamp duty needs to be paid as per Indian Law, the stamp duty in respect of that document is paid after the document comes to India. In the aforesaid cases, the buying of stamp paper as a method of stamp duty is not adopted.
In this regard, I would like to have your valued views/opinion as to the following:
Does the Indian Stamp Act or any of the State Stamp Laws prohibit taking out of stamp paper outside India?
Is there any prohibition providing that agreement executed outside India cannot be on a stamp paper bought before the date of execution?
Thanking you in advance.
Warm Regards,
CS Unnikrishnan Venugopalan
Dhanesh
27 June 2009 at 14:56
Respected Sir/Madam,
I have signed a irrevocable Power of Attorney, which mentioned that I cannot proceed with the sale of the concerning immovable property (located in Mumbai), without the consent of the agent.
However, no other interest of agent was mentioned. Power of attorney is neither signed by any witness nor registered.
Now, even though I want to settle the dispute, the agent is not willing to give his consent.
Can I settle the property issue without agent's consent ? Can I cancel the POA ? Can the agent file case against me, if I settle the dispute without his consent?
I am confused, Please Help!
Thank you.
prakash bajpai
27 June 2009 at 12:14
Dear friends,
I am staying in an apartment complex. There was some problem with a neighbour related to gossiping about myself and wife with other neighbours in the complex. After a show off discussion our families stopped interacting in any way. Now the said neighbour has apparently engaged a lawyer and this lawyer has sent a legal notice claiming that we are mentally torturing and harassing them. We should stop doing this otherwise a police complaint shall be filed. The lawyer seems of very low capability as the letter is so full of errors that one can hardly understand what is meant to be conveyed. There is nothing specific mentioned in the letter by way of date or incidents.even the spelling of the name is wrong.
What is suggested course of action? Should I respond at all?
if Yes how a) by myself or b) through a lawyer?
Nehal
27 June 2009 at 12:12
Dear Sir
Is there any limitation on using brackets in a name of a company to be incorporated in India?
Regards
Nehal
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
436 cr p c
Bail in bailable offence- procedure of -if the accused is prepared to give bail,the police officer or the court is bound to release him on such terms as to bail as may to be reasonable-Right of claiming trial in a bailable offence is an absolute and indefeasible right -Words of sec.436 are imperative and thereis discretion in granting the bail in bailable offence?