srinivasan
20 June 2009 at 14:00
what is right of the daughter in partnership firm with in the family members after 2005 as a copastner after the death of her father interstate sir,the partnership was between the family members alown not stranges.Her father was a partner with his brothers in different business,since they sold a property which was divied among brothers as ajointfamily property,the funds where invested in his partnership firm with his family members thatis his 2 sons leaving the daughters.Will the daughter get equal shair in the partnership business,since they were not included in the partnership deed.will the daughters be treated as copasners along with the sons.
Nehal
20 June 2009 at 13:33
Can a Partner contract with the Partnership firm in which he is a partner?
Regards
Nehal
rahul mishra
20 June 2009 at 13:27
Is there any law in civil for disable person under rent control act
john
20 June 2009 at 12:45
Dear Experts,
Based on false dowery harassment complaint filed my wife,my family members got obsolete AB and I got 3 months.In the meantime we attended mediation at High Court.There is one more mediation session om 10th July, But my AB ends on 30th June.
My question is,
1)Can I ask for AB extention before 30th June or after the mediation on 10th July.
2)Is there any possibility police arrest in between the mediation time?
Please give your valueable advice.
S. Krishnamoorthy
20 June 2009 at 12:42
The ESIC authorities have quoted Madras High Court Judgment in "PTC Vs Appellate Authority" dated 1975 that the under the Model Standing Orders the no. of apprentice/trainees to be engaged in an establishment should not exceed 5%. If exceeds, the trainees will be treated as employees and ESI subscription should be paid. Can any of the friends help in finding out the details of the judgment and the context in which this was made?
Commonsense dictates that there cannot be any restriction in the no. of trainees to be engaged in an establishment.
Thank you.
PRACHI
20 June 2009 at 12:36
Hi All:
we wish to register a leave & license agreement within the jurisdiction of Bandra Sub registrar.
What should be the value of the stamp paper to execute a power of attorney to authorise someone to sign the agreement before the sub registrar?
Regards
Prachi
V K Khanna
20 June 2009 at 05:26
Evidence is closed of both sides. Cross examination is over of both sides. Hearing has started. The matter is argued and completed by Complainants and Opposite Party(OP) No.1.
OP2 was to argue but OP3 submits a petition for fresh evidence and desires stay in the hearing till expert advice is received by court.
Is it permissible under the law if not any ruling on the matter. If anyone can guide.
V K Khanna
sreelata
19 June 2009 at 22:20
SIR/MAM,
Form -F is being filled for settlement of Gratuity. THIS IS THE CASE WHERE GRATUITY IS BEING PAID TO NOMINEES
In our company we have our own trust.
HOW MANY COPIES OF THE FORM SHOULD BE FILLED.
IS IT TRIPLICATE OR DUPLICATE .
CAN WE TAKE AN ORIGINAL & PHOTO COPY IT.
IN CASE OF MULTIPLE NOMINEES WHETHER THE FORM IS TO BE SIGNED JOINTLY, OR CAN THEY SUBMIT INDIVIDUAL FORMS.
kindly answer
thank u
sreelata
19 June 2009 at 22:15
Sir ,
SIR/MAM
At the time of joining the company employee shall give the nominations .aND at such point of time ,children shall be below 18 years of age.But suppose say employee expired and if the nominees crossed (say sons) 18 years of age & daughters get married .how to settle the above 3 benfeits. whether we should not consider the nominations forms filled by employee .
pl kindly calrify each benefit wise i.E
PF,GRATUTITY, EPS-95 .
I SHALL BE THANK FUL TO U
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
REGARDING PROPERTY SALE AFTER ENTERING AGREEMENT
My wife along with five others had entered an agreement for purchase of a piece of land in december 2001.
the property consisted of three demarcated divisions.A,B and C.
A part of this property(A) was registered to the shareholders in feb 2002.
Subsequently two of the purchasing partners, puchased another part of the property(B) in their names without informing other parteners. the seller was probably informed that other partners of the sale agreement have no objections.
And susequently the third part of the property has been sold directly by the original seller to another outsider/ non party to the original agreement.
One of the shareholders of original agreement was ofcourse aware and has certified as legal sale at the time of registration of the property (C).
How can my wife claim the possession of illegally sold properties/demand our fare share. the documentry proof of advance paid in february 2002, xerox of demand drafts, against the properties B and C, is available with us.
Secondly against whom shall we file a suit. against the original holder of property OR the individual who had connived with the original seller in making further illegal sales.