A Truthseeker
11 April 2009 at 19:57
death sentence is awarded in rarest of rare case.but so far as man is concerned is there any case that can be termed as rarest of rare? our scripture enjoins each soul is potentially divine. dacoit and ghoul Ratnakar was so corrected nay transformed that he became the greatest poet to compose Ramayan.incarceration for the rest of the life would not do instead of death?
sampat mane
11 April 2009 at 16:59
Dear Experts,
I am holding ICICI bank credit card and against my purchase I had made a payment by Internet. This payment did not reflect in my next statement as the intermediary (processing house bungled up with credit card no.).
Due to this i was charged exhorbitant penalty without any fault of mine. I argued with the ICICI bank and asked for reversal. ICICI bank did not help me in any form.
Hence I stopped usig the card and accordingly I mailed them the status.
Their was no reply but a statement charging me penalty for every month of non-payment of old dues (which was not).
Finally since i was holding a savings account with them, they deducted the amount arbitrarily without even prior informing me. I got a letter from them after 5 days of the deduction.
What action can i take against these arbitrary decision?
Where can I approach? i have copy of all the correspondence I have done with them and their reply on it.
Please Help
rgd
Aparna Mane
Urjit Shukla
11 April 2009 at 16:53
Dear experts,
plz informe me that how much cases are pending in diffrent type of courts in all over India.
Urjit Shukla
11 April 2009 at 16:42
Dear all experts,
As I want to know that Which type of Questions will arise in P.P.'s interview?
Plz give some exampel questions.
What should I have to prepair for interview?
Any other Instruction if any.
Jitendra Raval
11 April 2009 at 15:58
The accused handed over two cheque to the complainant which was singed but without payee name and date,amount etc in good payment for payment of insurance premium in 2002.
There were few financial transations between the two but nothing was due. When relation between the two spoiled, the complainant filled up the blanks and lodged the cheques in 2008 which was bounce as the account was inoperative after some time after his transfer.
The complainant filled the blanks but forget to strike bearer and hence these cheques remain bearer when presented for payment and returned unpaid.
My question is "Whether the bearer cheques covered under S.138' If not kindly provide me the citation.
Or it does't metter the cheques in question was bearer or order.
Kidly reply
jitendra
11 April 2009 at 14:06
my client has purchased a resdential block he had bonafide made all the payment to the vendor and took possession of the block lastly he had made the remaining payment by a cheque of Rs. 9,000 within two days my client was informed by the society that the vendor had not paid muncipal taxes till the date of possession so my client had given instruction to stop payment & asked the vendor to clear the said amount the vender had not responded so my client has paid the said amount to the corporation from this event the vendor is also refusing to sign the necessary forms relating to transfer the said block in my clients name from which forum i can get easy redressal
JS Baath
11 April 2009 at 13:48
D/Sir/madam,
I residing in Punjab & my daughter's birth in 2004 in Haryana. I want to change/rename her name in Birth certificate.
Plz. help me how can I change/rename my daughter's name in Original Birth Certificate.
thanking you,
(JS Baath)
Chetan
11 April 2009 at 11:43
Dear Member,
In a case the employee work on a payment of Rs. 5000/-(TA & DA paid seperately) from last 2 years. but he did not get the Salaray and TA DA from last 10 months. Now he leave the company and write the letter to the company but co. did not reply.
The co. is not registered and haviong no registered office but my client provide me the Banglore Address but whereas my client receive the appointment letter from NASHIK (Maharashtra) and he submiited all his reports at NASHIK.
1) Whether I can file suit in Labour Court for recovery of his payment. Pls provide provision.
2) Whether I have to serve notice to both the Offices, provide Limitation.
Regards
JAGADEESH GOVIND
11 April 2009 at 11:21
Dear Sir,
I am a real estste agent engaged in sale of plots.On 4/11/1993 I had issued a letter to Mr.A accepting Rs.50,000/- towards advance of a plot and issued receipt for the same.There is no time limit had mentioned for the execution of sale deed.Mr.A omitted to purcahse the land and we sold the land on 2001 to a third party. On 15/09/2008 Mr.A had send a legal notice for specific performance of the contract.
My questions are
1) Whether the claim by Mr.A is hit by limitaton act or not ?
2) Whether Mr.A is eligible for compensation as the agreement become unenforceble as we sold the property to a third party?
Kindly advice.
Thanks and Regards
JAGADEESH
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Punitive damages from visa-authorities through Writ Petition
Artist Dr. Mumbiram is an Indian citizen. His wife and son have German passports. Through various malafide avoidance tactics the local Foreigner Registration Office failed to forward without any reason our application for a 5 year visa extension for our son, who has a German passport, to the Office of the Principal Secretary(special) Home Dept. Maharashtra, who is the competent authority to grant such extensions as well as the authority to seek redressal of grievances against local FROs. Our personal appearances at the Princ.Sec.’s Office, letters and a formal complaint against the local FROs also produce no relief. For a period of over 2 years we were even without an interim visa extension for our son, whose earlier visa had expired in the meantime. We have filed a Writ Petition in the Bombay High Court requesting the court to direct the local FRO and the Princ. Sec.’s Office to grant us the 5year visa extension for which we had applied for over 2 years ago. We have also asked the court to direct the Respondents to pay us compensation for the grievous damages we suffered on account of the malafide inactions of the respondents. In the first hearing the court appeared almost certain to grant our request for the visa extension but we are not so sure about the compensation part. We feel justice will not be fully served if we only get the visa extensions that we should have gotten 2 years ago. We feel we deserve exemplary damages (punitive damages) from the respondents for the damages we suffered on account of the malafide inactions of the Respondents. How should we argue before the court for our request for such compensation ?