For filing appeal against the order of the Distict Consumers commission, is it mandatory to remit the award amount before filing Appeal to the State Commission?
One of the attestor in sale agreement admiting his signature but not contents of the agreement how can we solve this problem
One of the attestor in sale agreement admiting his signature but not contents of the agreement how can we solve this problem
Hi. I recently bought a plot in a housing development society (they sell small plots for construction of individual houses within a gated society, with shared amenities). This lies in the Mangaon Taluka of Raigad District in Maharashtra.
The plot I bought had a "Open Space" of 2108 sqmt designated right behind it on the official Sanctioned Layout blueprint.
Here is the link to an image from the Sanctioned Layout blueprint: https://ibb.co/YW8gq10 . The plot in question is number 43.
However, the builder has gone ahead and constructed an Overhead Water Storage Tank within that area, approximately 15-20 meters high.
The houses in the society are permitted to be constructed up to 2 floors (as they are independent villas/bungalows), and hence no matter what construction I go for, the background of my house will always be that water tank and my view on that side will be completely obstructed, as the tank now sits right between my plot and the Amenities Area. If there was indeed "Open Space" there, I would have the direct view of the Amenities Area from my plot.
Moreover, the tank will affect the aesthetics of the entire portion of this society and all houses surrounding mine too, and also of the amenities area as it sits right next to that as well.
I am fairly confident that construction of anything of this sort on an area designated as "Open Space" is not legal, as the space does not really remain "Open" anymore.
In other diagrammatic representations of the plot (not the official blueprint), the area was supposed to be a "Garden Area", which would be an acceptable use of the "Open Space" that exists in the official Sanctioned Layout. But a water tank is surely not allowed there, right?
I was able to find this article, although this related more specifically to larger City planning: https://realty.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/regulatory/construction-cant-be-allowed-on-open-space-in-approved-building-layouts-sc/75206498
I would appreciate any advice from an expert on these matter. Also if you can provide any links to specific articles/clauses within the legislations regarding Property Law supporting my stance on this issue, that will be extremely helpful. I intend to request the builders to move the tank, and if I have the law backing me it will be much easier to have this resolved.
Dear Expert
My great grand father has created a oral temple trust during 1852 with houses for priest and shops for the income to the temple. Now the Banks are asking for KYC like trust deed and PAN. Is it possible to register the same Trust act in Karnataka and what is the stamp duty for the existing properties of the oral trust.
I bought a plot from a GPA holder by making a Sale Deed and in the sale deed, clearly mentioned the principle owners are alive.
Is there any problem in future
If so how I should clear it out
Kindly advice me.
It was a one plot sold to three different owners A, B, C but with same house no ( A 1 )on registry . It was sold 30 years back to all of them ..the third owner C sold his property to A in 2018. During construction in 2018, that property was booked . Now even B want to apply commercial electricity meter but electricity claims that as per McD the A 1 property is booked. B is seperate owner having all documents with him properly. How can we proceed further to come out this issue of same house no n booking thing . How can we prove ourself as not booked in records of MCD or to BSES.
Dear Experts,
My father passed away on April 2023 where he is a complainant in a Criminal Case for cheque bounce. As a legal heir, If I want to proceed the case further with my lawyer (say Mr.X), Should I get NOC from my Father's lawyer (Say Mr.Y) ? or If I want to continue the case with the existing lawyer Mr.Y, Am I need to sign POA / Vakkalat once again ?
Sec 417 420
Sir/Madam,
Had a relationship with a lady. She filed a case saying I have obtained some amount during the relationship time. But I never got any amount. My lawyer said there is no such evidence as she is from poor family, no background to have such huge money to give me and she is well educated and worked as share holder in private company. But judge said how can we expect evidence when both were in relationship, she might given by trust anyhow and no need proof and evidence on such cases.
I don't know how can I prove that i never got money from her (actually never got) and would like to know really no need proof for petitioner for such cases to win her side? Is there any section to save me? please help me mention the section numbers if any.
Vasanth
Chennai