SHAIKH ARAISH MOHAMMED KAVI
10 January 2017 at 01:56
i am working in call centre currently
from past 13 month and right now i am on notice period i have completed my 29 days only one day was left to complete i fall sick for 2 days and team leader mark me absconded is this right or wrong
PRODYOT ROY
09 January 2017 at 21:02
I made a registered settlement deed of an immovable property against my namein 1994 at Sonarpur ,Soth 24 Parganas,West Bengal with my brother condition is that I made ground floor with the assistance of government loan as I am government employee , after repayment of loan you may built 1st floor and get a right of the right of said floor but now he act misdeed , forcefully closed a common door , always intimidate my family etc.Seeing his activities l apprehend Can he re-registered the same immovable property after 1994 with the change of term and condition in his favor from Register of assurances without my knowledge as well as cancelling the previous registered settlement deed? I am partly handicraft can't move freely that is why I am requesting you plz advice me.Sir though it was posted earlier but it was incompleted , Sorry for inconvenience and ignorance
PRODYOT ROY
09 January 2017 at 20:58
I made a registered settlement deed of an immovable property against my namein 1994 at Sonarpur ,Soth 24 Parganas,West Bengal with my brother condition is that I made ground floor with the assistance of government loan as I am government employee , after repayment of loan you may built 1st floor and get a right of the right of said floor but now he act misdeed , forcefully closed a common door , always intimidate my family etc.Seeing his activities l apprehend Can he re-registered the same immovable property after 1994 with the change of term and condition in his favor from Register of assurances without my knowledge as well as cancelling the previous registered settlement deed? I am partly handicraft can't move freely that is why I am requesting you plz advice me.Sir though it was posted earlier but it was incompleted , Sorry for inconvenience and ignorance
raj
09 January 2017 at 20:30
Dear Experts,
Can a government servant get family pension during service period after the death of government servant spouse or get family pension after the retirement.
nikhil jaiswal
09 January 2017 at 18:38
My grandfather had registered the front portion (25 ft long)of his only 3 floor built home in my mother's name in 1990 by paying appropriate stamp duty and the rest behind this (100 ft) has not been yet devided amongst my father and uncles. Now we want to seperate this front portion from the remaining by bricks but the problem is my uncle who lives behind and doesn't allow us to seperate it forcefully without any legal reason. The only problem is in the third floor, the 1 &2 floor we have blocked by bricks but on the last room of the third floor he even doesn't let us enter which is in my mom's name. The local police is not supporting us and we don't want to go to the civil court becouse of the long term of proccess. How can we possess n seperate it completely. We have all the legal documents.
THIYAGARAJAN
09 January 2017 at 17:39
Dear Experts, I have received a cheque from a person who owes me a money. But the problem with that cheque is he has written the amount in words with some spelling errors (i.e., Wrote Fifty thousand as fivety thousand) but wrote the amount in numbers correctly. Is there any chances for the cheque to dishonoured on that grounds. And I suspect that he has intentionally made this error because if the cheque dishonoured on ground of Insufficient fund we can sue him U/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument act and to escape from that only he has made some spelling errors. If the cheque returned on the ground of spelling mistakes, Can I sue him? Hope you understand my situation. Kindly provide the advice in this regard.
Rajendra
09 January 2017 at 16:59
Smt.Ramrati Radheshyam Gupta - PLAINTIFF versus
1. Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta,
2. Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta,
3. Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta,
4. Kamla Ramdeo Gupta,
5. Devendra Radheshyam Gupta,
6. Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta -DEFENDANTS.
CONSENT TERMS
1. The Defendants waive service of Writ of Summons.
2. Defendants admit that the properties described in Ex ‘A’ to the plaint were the property of Hindu Undivided Family consisting of plaintiffs and defendants.
3. Defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta, admits that under an Agreement of Family Settlement dated 1.10.1998 at Ex ‘D’ to the plaint, defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta received from the plaintiff and defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta a sum of Rs.75,000/-(Rupees Seventy Five Thousands only) by cheque no. 434494 dated 25-1-1999 and another sum of Rs.75,000/-(Rupees Seventy Five Thousands only) by cheque no. 434495 dated 2-2-1999 drawn on Shramik Sahakari Bank Ltd., Sakinaka, Mumbai branch totaling to Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand only) in full and final payments of the value of their share in the property mentioned at Ex ‘A’ to the plaint and in consideration therof they have relinquished, released and surrendered all their right Title and interest therein in favour of the plaintiff and defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta. Defendants admit the correctness of the contents of the said Agreement of Family Settlement at Ex ‘D’ to the plaint. Defendants further admit that they have duly signed the said Agreement at Ex ‘D’ to the plaint after being read over the same to them in Hindi language. Defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta, admits that they have now no right title and interest of any nature whatsoever in the said property described in Ex ‘A’ to the Plaint.
4. Defendants (1) Ramesh Ramdeo Gupta, (2) Rajendra Ramdeo Gupta, (3) Pushpa Ramdeo Gupta, (4) Kamla Ramdeo Gupta, agree and undertake that they will neither interfere with the management of the said property by the plaintiff and defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta as exclusive owner thereof, nor shall they interfere in getting the said property transferred in the name of plaintiff And defendants (5) Devendra Radheshyam Gupta, (6) Mahendra Radheshyam Gupta.
5. Decree in terms of Consent Terms.
6. No order as to cost.
CONSENT TERMS WERE MADE AND IT BECOMES DECREE IN HIGH COURT.
If Plaintiff Expired and Defendant No.1 is also expired and the given Rights were not Executed in 17 years by the Rights holder i.e. Defendant No. 5 & 6.
Now my Query is, IF RIGHTS WERE NOT EXECUTED FOR 17 YEARS, CAN IT IS POSSIBLE BY DEFENDANTS NO. 5 & 6 TO EXECUTE IT NOW?
Anonymous
09 January 2017 at 16:39
My father owes three lakhs to a catering contractor. The contractor
pressed and received a blank undated cheque from my father. Now he has received summon under section 138. My father doesn't have intention of cheating the contract but he is unable to arrange for funds now. Kindly guide how to proceed
akrity
09 January 2017 at 15:32
Sir,
I am working with a Singapore based company since 3 year,they decided to pay me approximately 60,000/ per month now since 2 years they pay me 20,000/ per month.now as I want to switch job what I can do to reclaim my arrear salary.please give suggestions m really worried.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Ipc 326 case spot panchnama
In a state criminal case spot panchnama was signed by 2 panch witnesses out of which only one turned up for giving his statement .This panch witness is known and very close to the family of complainant who was pressurised to sign the panchnama.In his chief examination he is coroborating the story of state prosecution but in his cross examination he is saying that i was told by complainant and his relative uncle who is also eye witness in the case to sign the panchnama .THOUGH HE WAS NOT PRESENT HE IS COROBORATING THE PROSECUTION STORY AS NARRATED BY COMPLAINANT AND HIS UNCLE(practising as a lawyer in the same court.)
The court was hesitant to declare him hostile.Does his statement and cross exam is helpful to the prosecution or it will be discarded?