sakthi
22 March 2025 at 19:10
Respected Learned Experts, I am a retired central government servant. During my service, I was suspended for a period 272 days for a criminal case. The trial court has acquitted me under benefit of doubt. In departmental enquiry, I was imposed with compulsory retirement. The order of suspension was deemed suspension as I had been imprisoned exceeding 48 hours. After the order of the acquittal, I had applied for regularization of suspension period which was turned down as treated as not in duty. I had challenged the order before the CAT and the CAT has set aside the order, directed the department to regularize the period of suspension under the rules applicable. Now after my retirement my department has regularised the suspension period as EOL under FR-54B(7). Whether I am eligible for any monetary benefits such as annual increments, revision of pensionary benefits based on the order passed. I am a senior citizen and I don't want to proceed further with legal battles. My query restricted to the eligibility of any monetary benefits based on the order passed. The order is silent about this. With utmost respect and advance thanks, I pray the Experts to clarify the issue please.
amol
22 March 2025 at 15:54
Hello Sir/Madam,
My flat value is above 1 cr which I purchased 2 years back in Satara Maharashtra.
I have paid 100% demand but not yet received possession letter.
developer delaying my possession from 6 month as defined date.
For getting possession letter and for delay, where should I file my case.
My property cost is above 1 cr, so should I file case in National Commission or in first court District Forum?
Patricia Watson
22 March 2025 at 07:30
Hi everyone! I hope this post finds you well. Ignorance occurs when you recognize an opportunity but decide to overlook it. Not everything you come across online is false or deceptive. The internet was designed for various purposes to assist individuals globally. I never thought I would discover a spell caster online capable of providing me with guaranteed winning numbers that turned me into a LOTTERY winner of TEN MILLION DOLLARS after I attentively adhered to all his advice and today I’m happy to announce that my financial aspirations was fulfilled with his amazing spell. If you need LORD MEDUZA help on anything in your life, contact him on
Email via : Lordmeduzatemple @ hotmail . com
LORD MEDUZA is the BEST when it comes to spell casting.
Anonymous
21 March 2025 at 19:55
Can a person who is not the petitioner or the respondent in the case apply for an immediate listing of the SLP filed in the Supreme Court (which is already ordered for NMD for fixed month , but not listed yet)? (Because Similar cases have been pending in the High Court for years waiting for the verdict of this SLP. So we are wasting our time, money and lives.)
Amit Jaiswal
21 March 2025 at 16:24
मैंने अपनी पत्नी द्वारा लगाए गए धाराओं 498A और 325 IPC के तहत केस में न्यायिक प्रक्रिया का सामना किया है। इसमें, धारा 498A के मामले में मैं और मेरा परिवार बरी हो चुके हैं, लेकिन IPC की धारा 325 में मुझे दोषी ठहराकर सजा सुनाई गई।
इस मामले में, जब मेरी पत्नी की मेडिकल लीगल रिपोर्ट (MLC) तैयार की गई, तब डॉक्टर ने उसकी कोहनी में किसी भी प्रकार की चोट का उल्लेख नहीं किया था और न ही एक्स-रे कराने की सलाह दी थी। इसके बावजूद, एक्स-रे कराया गया, और एक्स-रे करने वाले डॉक्टर ने भी यह स्पष्ट नहीं किया कि फ्रैक्चर कितना पुराना था। इस फैसले के खिलाफ मैंने अपील दायर की थी, लेकिन अपीलीय न्यायालय ने डॉक्टर के बयान को गलत तरीके से पढ़ा और माना कि डॉक्टर ने एक्स-रे कराने की सलाह दी थी। क्योंकि यह मेरा प्रथम अपराध था, तो कोर्ट ने मेरी सजा को घटाकर ‘कोर्ट उठने तक’ कर दिया, लेकिन मुझे दोषमुक्त नहीं किया।
इसके बाद, मेरी पत्नी ने घरेलू हिंसा का मामला फिर से दायर किया, जबकि पहले दो बार उसका घरेलू हिंसा का मामला खारिज हो चुका था। IPC की धारा 325 में दोष सिद्ध होने के आधार पर न्यायालय ने घरेलू हिंसा को प्रमाणित माना और मेरी पत्नी द्वारा दायर धारा 125 CrPC के अंतर्गत भरण-पोषण की राशि को सीधे नौ हजार रुपये से बढ़ाकर तीस हजार रुपये कर दिया।
मैं इस तीस हजार रुपये की राशि देने में असमर्थ हूँ, जिसके कारण मेरे खिलाफ DV Act की धारा 31 के तहत भी मामला दर्ज कर दिया गया है।
IPC की धारा 325 में जो फैसला फरवरी 2020 में आया था, उसके खिलाफ मैंने उच्च न्यायालय में अपील दायर की है, जिसमें देरी को माफ करने के लिए "Condonation of Delay" की अर्जी भी दी गई है। क्या अदालत मुझे IPC 325 से दोषमुक्त करेगी, और यदि ऐसा होता है तो क्या घरेलू हिंसा के मामले में IPC 325 में दोषी माने जाने के आधार पर जो भरण-पोषण की राशि बढ़ाई गई थी, वह खारिज हो जाएगी या नहीं।
मैं इस मामले में न्याय की अपेक्षा करता हूँ और उचित मार्गदर्शन की आशा करता हूँ।
amol
21 March 2025 at 08:59
Hello Sir/Madam,
I have purchased under construction flat 2 years back in Satara Maharashtra
I have paid 100% demand then I received flat keys but not yet received possession letter.
But builder issuing me possession letter 6 month back date.
Should I accept this possession letter with 6 month back date after OC issued? Any cons for it?
Is possession letter mandatory if received keys?
Can filing in both consumer court and RARA simultaneously allowed for wrong date of possession letter?
Which one is fastest between consumer court OR RERA to get order?
Sandip Das
20 March 2025 at 23:16
If there is a "simple injury" of a bike rider resulting from a minor collision (unintentional) with a car, will it qualify for rash and negligent driving as per BNS 125(a)?
chinu
20 March 2025 at 09:32
I have to take a 3bhk flat on rent in Bengaluru for Rs 38,500. In all my previous agreements, consideration price is mentioned as Rs 0, whereas the vendor for making agreement is telling us to write consideration price as Rs 4,000.
What should be the consideration price for this and is this of any importance to me.
What exactly is meant by consideration price?
Is there any importance of mentioning this?
Amit Jaiswal
19 March 2025 at 19:34
mere uper gharelu hinsa ki dhara 31 ke tahat case kiya gya hai ki main gharelu hinsa ke tahat diye gaye gujara bhatta nhi de raha hoon . jbaki order me dhara 18 ke antargat koi bhi order nhi hai to dhara 31 mujh par kaise lagu ho sakti hai. kripya jbab den
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Is ulc still applicable on site purchased 50 years back?
I have a residential building in Visakhapatnam. My Late mother was a Teacher and she was allotted a plot by the Teachers Co-operative House Building Society Ltd in 1972. Society purchased the site from Visakhapatnam town planning trust, which is presently known as VMRDA. Subsequently the Society conveyed the said plot by virtue of a sale deed on 20/03/1980 to be enjoyed by the member, his legal representatives and assignees with absolute rights from generation to generation. My parents constructed a residential building in it, duly taking plan approval from Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam. We are living in the property since 1983. After my parents passed away, the title of the property changed to my name. we are paying property taxes, water taxes and Electricity charges as per government authorities assessment in the past (about) 40 years.
In 3/2023, I received a notice from Urban Land Ceiling (ULC) office, informing me that my property is in surplus lands under ULC Act and catogerised it as unauthorised occupation. The notice informed me to regularize the unauthorized occupation by paying an amount equivalent to present registered value. Everything was done after taking approvals from the authorities. Now I am being told that it is unauthorized occupation. I did not respond to the notice. Now on 10/03/2025, I received similar notice with a wrong name but address is mine. I did not receive the notice as it is not in my name. Prior to 3/2003, I have not received any notices or declarations from ULC office.
Is ULC still applicable? What do I have to do now?