Ananda
03 December 2021 at 00:31
Dear Sirs,
In HC maintenance hearing, wifef filed false affidavit , I produced proof. So lawyer insisted on a joint memo to settle and clsoe, which I was not comfortable (I had posted this earlier but I cant reply to the same thread now). FInally no joint memo was signed but individual memos/affidavit were filed.
I will not challenge wire's exparte divorce. Wife will not claim any maintenance and not pursue any criminal case. These were in memo/affidavit.
I also said, orally that divorce is fine but I will not giving up rights to escalate her false affidavit. ( I may never do it but I dont want to give up my rights).
Though I had made my thoughts clear to my lawer, in final orders, it has come out as a settlment and that i agree to all her conditions. my oral statement was not mentioned in the order. there is lot of refernce to oral statements by lawyer. Can this order be appealed? If I say that HC did not mention my oral statements correctly, is that like contempt? As a lay person, should I simply accept it or can I question or comment on it?Â
thanks
A
Hardik Panchal
02 December 2021 at 20:07
The ancestral land was distributed in 2007 and it was legally registered. but in 2017 after resurvey which wasnt informed & we were not aware as we live in another city, the actual area of the land was changed and was included in elder brothers 7/12. After getting aware we tried to convice the elder brother but he is not in the mood of giving our rightful shares back and now he has acquired the part of our land. what we can do in this situation. There is an entry of distribution in the 7/12 which defines the distribution and 50-50 shares of the property can we use that as proof and can do any legal action on them ? please help!
Siva
02 December 2021 at 18:51
I have crpc 417 & 420 on me. Person A lodge complaint on me with some of her associates person B, C and D. Police lodge complaint and taken statement B, C and D as evidance of this case. In fact, police taken money from them and supporting them. Police summoned 2-3 times to go police station for enquiry, but i didnt go as i know police wont talk for me. Then police filed chargesheet and case started 5 years ago, until last month person A to D and police never appear to court for hearing, but every month i went court. Suddenly all people A, B, C & D came to court and just reitterate what they told in the complaint and as per chargesheet. Actualy the case is, A is telling me i got huge money from her with no evidence. Person B, C and D are her friends, they just went to police station when she complaint me. Police treated B, C and D as evidence for what A given in the complaint, but not direct evidence for that money transaction.
My lawer never cross question actively when A, B, C, D on the box during the enquiry in the court, but he says, now we can just hear what ABCD tell to the court. Actual argument will happen only later stage. No need to cross question them when they stand on the box. I thought he should cross question them when they stand in box in front of judge instead just hear and finally arge with opponent lawyer. I suspect they may not come back to court or opponent lawyer can oppose to not bring them to court later when my lawer request.
Is court procedure is like that? Is my lawyer says true? Otherwise can I meet Judge in person to explain my side?
raju
02 December 2021 at 18:26
Victim of sexual assault her case court taken as IPC Complaint private pending for complainant evidence. Can this criminal case be transferred to another district.
Maya Singh
02 December 2021 at 17:53
I had filed a suit in May, 2015 in Bombay High Court, Original side, when commercial courts act had not come. Mine is a commercial dispute matter but since the court fees was not paid and only paid in January, 2020 hence the suit got registered but as a regular suit in October, 2021. My advocate is unable to convert (does not know the procedure to convert regular suit to commercial suit) it to commercial suit. Please if your learned can advise I shall be highly obliged.
Anonymous
02 December 2021 at 12:43
Kindly advise whether while mortgaging a hospital property, whether the lease agreement between the company/hospital and the landlord (also the directors of the company) formpart of the chain of title deed
Saikrishna kandhikatla
01 December 2021 at 13:18
My issue is a landlord and tenant issue. We are landlords. The tenant didnot pay the rent for months and now the rent stood at Rs. 3 lakhs. We recently got a decree to collect the rent from the tenant. But, tenant said that he will go for appeal. Now, we want a judgement which mentions that, untill and unless the rent is deposited with the court, the appeal should not be allowed. Can any expert help me in this issue ?
Anonymous
30 November 2021 at 14:35
Hi Experts,
I have placed an order for a sofa set and a dining table with a furniture store in one of the districts of Karnataka state.
Total cost is 1,00,000/ - and to begin the work the store guy has already collected 50% of payment from me as advance.
It has been two months since 50% payment, till date, I have not received any updates from the store whatsoever. My calls are not answered and dealer keeps dodging me with various excuses.
Store has not given my any receipt towards my payment, however, i have all the bank transactions deatils as it was an online transaction.
How can I go about in cancelling my order and taking full refund of what I have already paid and am I eligible to claim damages?
Kindly guide - thanks in advance.
Anonymous
30 November 2021 at 13:24
dear sir/madam
I have registered sale agreement around 2 years ago and i paid the stamp duty as per market value of the property. Now when i went to registered the sale deed register asking me to pay the stamp duty on current value of the property. suggest. when i have registered or unregistered sale agreement value of property as on sale agreement payable or value of the property at the time registeration of sale is payable. kindly advise me.
Thanks
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Sale of share in property
In a unregistered MoU of family settlement pertaining to unmovable property where in it is mentioned that shares are to be divided on percentage basis 25%/25%/25%/ & 25%.
It to be noted that no where in the aggreed & signed by all share holders in the said MoU mentions that in a situation if one wants to sell his 25% share to a willing buyer he has to intimate, or get a NOC from the rest of the share holders
Query ..is there any legal wrong doing in this type of sale?