Dear Experts,
I am writing on behalf of my cousin and its like just a normal question but we are confused hence i required your expert opinion.
My cousin had admitted HMP 13 in Civil Court from july 2018, but her husband didnt appear in court.
Court had accepted evidence from my cousin, her notice for exparte divorce, blocking of her husband rights ..etc all the formalities has been completed. And the case status shown as a Final Arguments.
But suddenly, her husband attend in court and submitted an affidavit and court has accepted his application.
our lawyer said that he has to rights of application and now he will have to prove that all the allegations are false.
what should we do
Sirs,
At the trial PW(govt) in Acb case , refused to support Panchnama and stated at the trial court what actually happened at the time of trap and also denyed the demand of money by accused person ,and also stated that the accused person was not came at the trap place but the complainant ride him at the place and complaintant hand over money to his blood relation brother .Now is the question that may court convict accused person on ground of complaintant JUBANI ?
Whereas Panch not supported complaintant.
ABC Pvt Ltd has registered 2 projects under RERA, project completion date for 1 of the project was 10/08/2019 but the promoter didn't applied for extension till today & now he wants to apply for extension of project under RERA. Can he apply for the same, & Procedure for the same?
Our society is registered in july 2019. Previously it was run as an AOP and doing charitable work duly recognised by collector of the city. Now our FCRA registration is denied on the ground that our society is new and it is not 3 years old. I have gone through FCRA Act, in the Act, it is written that applicant organisation should work for reasonable time in charitable activities. Now my view is our society is old but we have registered it in july 2019. What is your suggestion and solution?
My husband had deserted me when I was pregnant and has now has filed for an RCR. My daughter is a year old now. We attended 2 counselling sessions already and the 3rd one is next month. By when do i need to give a written response to the court? My lawyer said 90 days, so 90 days from when, when I asked the counselor, she said the court will tell me to when to do it, once the matter moves from counselling to court.
Respected sir ,
Bom me equitable mortgage ke liye esbtr bola tha but abhi sadha challan se payment kiya hai to ab ye log deface document mang rahe hai to plz suggest me sir
Dear all, I would like to draw your attention to the recent banking scam in Sri Guru Raghavendra Co-op bank in bangalore where RBI has ordered the bank to stop all normal functions of the bank such as acceptance of new deposits, grant of new loans or making new investments and put a cap on withdrawal of amount by each person to a maximum of Rs.35000/- for a period of six months.. In this case, can the depositor can a police complaint of cheating against the bank management where they they been giving false information regarding NPA and such other financial information based on which the innocent depositor has deposited money in bank.? Will the police be able to take action based on the complaint filed by the depositor?
bank recovery civil suit is filed against me and forgot to attend the court on given date. resultantly the suit is marked as exparte and judgement is passed exparty.
There is a partnership firm having two partner 1.Male and another female. Loan has been given it on the basis of post dated cheque. Cheque bears the signature of Male. Male expired in August 2019. Now Female partner neither wants to pay the amount nor wants to give another cheque. To save female from the rigorous of section 138 N I Act, in July 2019 about one month ago of death of Male partner, an Retirement Cum Reconstitution Deed was made in which Female Partner retires and a very old person was inserted as new Partner at the stamp paper of Rs.500/- notarized no. 500A.
There is another partnership firm of family of above male member having two partner 1.Male and another female. Loan has been given it on the basis of post dated cheque. Cheque bears the signature of Male. Now male partner neither wants to pay the amount nor wants to give another cheque. To save female from the rigorous of section 138 N I Act, in July 2019 about one month ago of death of above Male member of family, an Retirement Cum Reconstitution Deed was made in which Female Partner retires and the male who died in August 2019 was inserted as new Partner at the stamp paper of Rs.500/- notarized no. 500B.
Notary puts serial no. like 1,2,3,4,5,6….. etc if any notarized document has serial no. 500A (for the document that does not belong to document at serial no. 500, 500B) and 500B (for another documents that does not belong to document at serial no. 500 and 500A) .
1. Are these serial no. 500A and 500B ok as per Notary Act, or null and void (as it appears apparently that they have been inserted in between 500 and 501, antidated that is why they are numbered as A and B) ? 2. Any other guidance .
I have posted this at threat https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Notarised-documents-having-serial-no-with-a-and-b-as-suffix-207152.asp?message=Thank%20you,%20LCI%20and%20Lawyered%20representative%20shall%20contact%20you%20soon. also, as some persons are not designated yet as an expert.
I have posted this at threat https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Suit-u-order-37-cpc-against-legal-heir-against-dishonored-ch-716011.asp also, as some persons are not designated yet as an expert.
About service inam land karnataka village abolition act
Dear Sir/ Madam,
I need your opinion regarding my Ancestor property a Land 2 acre Granted under Service Inam (Karnataka village offices) to my Grand father during in 1929, He had total 6 children 3 sons and 3 daughters And my Grand father died before 1960 and there after during 1967 As per opposition party he is saying my Father and one of my father's elder brother sold 2 acre to his mother with a sale deed, and all this sale deed transaction detail we came to know when we got order copy from Tahsildar in 2013 in the case running from 1982 where sale deed number mentioned in that Oder copy and As per the Order given in 2013 this land land sold in between 1963 to 1978 where no bar for alienation and before enactment of Karnataka village abolition Act and this is the case familiar to Basheer ahmed Vs State of Karnataka so sanction this land to Baravadar's legal heirs and Due to demise of Buyer make katha and RTC in the name of their legal heir by obtaining necessary application from them like how order given on 2013 order copy, And There after in 2013 we got summons from the opposite party saying You misreading the order and misunderstand the same by knowing order is given in favour of you, like that he mentioned in the summons and we did not attend court even he also not attend for that case and later that case disposed in 2017 by saying Seems Plaintiff not interested to prosecute the case There fore suit is dismissed for the default for want of steps like how given order for his case for summons in 2017. And after i obtained that certified copy of Sale deed from the sub register office in 2018 Due to my mother health issue i was not able to take action immediately since 2012 and still said land not regranted to any one, And now My question is my Father used to say when he was alive I did not sold the property to any one even not made any signature like that he was saying So i have doubt that It could be a fabricated sale deed, So in this regard please guide me how can i cross check the sale deed whether it is real or fake, also does Hindu succession act applicable to this property and as per that can i reclaim the land now, For my Father we 3 children and For my father's elder brothers One died without marry and another brother died without issue so we are the legal heirs left to my Grand father, So Can we reclaim the service inam land back to our possession, Is it possible Also want to Inform in 1967 my father age was 14 so is that sale deed be valid as my father was minor during that time if he really done that sale deed.