Myself Advocate kanpur member of Adhivakta kalyan nidhi number 14144 have sent all papers to Lucknow on 12 Jan 2024 but no payment till date.Phone calls not entertained by office.myU.P.Bar council enrolment no.is 92 of year 1976.Thanks
what are the steps to be taken under order 21 rule 48(3).
garnishee did not attache the salary of JDR and EP is made absolute. even the garnishee did not attach the salary of JDR. show cause notice sent even though the garnishee did not attach. court ordered steps to be taken under order 21 rule 48(3). what are the steps in those aspect. please suggest.
Sir
Alienating christan minors property by father without leave of court is whether void or voidable. Because after becoming major 40 years gone. Possession is with me. The joint property was sold by my father when I was minor at 10 years.The property was gifted by my grand father in will deed as joint property with my Father. As per Guardian and wards act , guardian can sell without court permission. In which case it is voidable.but for christan, whether natural guardian can act as guardian without court permission.
minor property government value given to me in pedana sub registration office at veerabhadrapuram in pedana mandalam
Does majority Act Section -3 still valid or its withdrawn by Majority act 1999 Amendment(Where uniform 18 years of age has been mentioned age of Majority for all Indians)
Read more at: https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/ask_query.asp
Age of majority of persons domiciled in India.
- Subject as aforesaid, [every minor of whose person or property, or both, a guardian, other than a guardian for a suit within the meaning of Chapter XXXI of the [Code of Civil Procedure] [Substituted by Act 8 of 1890, Section 52, for "every minor of whose person or property a guardian has been or shall be appointed by any Court of Justice, and every minor under the jurisdiction of any Court of Wards".], has been or shall be appointed or declared by any Court of Justice before the minor has attained the age of eighteen years, and every minor of whose property the superintendence has been or shall be assumed by any Court of Wards before the minor has attained that age] shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the [Indian Succession Act [See now the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (39 of 1925)] or in any other enactment, be deemed to have attained his majority when he shall have completed his age of twenty-one years and not before.
Dear All,
I need these civil and criminal action taken to court and make this four people to vacate the flat or lock the flat with court order.
I need very powerful action taking lawyer to proceed further. they spoile the whole apartmment with illegal suspicious works and toomuch money pending from these people.
Thanks
Kalloor Joseph Michael
Dear All,
thi is an enquiry for the earlier message i received from different lawyers. very much thankful to all advocates and advisors supporting me.
now we dont have any choice i need to send court notice for public nuisense and voluntarily interfering and disturbing our works. so hereafter i cant give any excuse for these four people and specially 1 flat owner has to be vacated out. not paying money and so dirty and no manners and doing some illegal works. SO i need advise on these 3 enquiry
1. first 4 flat owners should not interfere in the maintenance work or any personnel issues
2. lady harrasment without respect and talking bad and not folowing our terms
3. 1 flat owner has to be vacated flat bcos not paying money or keeping premises clean. his flat has to be locked till he pays all the pending money.
4. these four people cheating money from other flat owners and directing wrong instructions and scammers.
Hey , I stay in delhi we got second floor and so we have installed a shoerack in the stairs .The second staircase which is going towards the third floor .
So the third floor people are saying to remove it ..is it legal or illegal ? As the third floor people are about to shift to thier floor.
Wife filed Sec498a in AP(Andhra), immediately filed DVC in TS(Telangana) state, and included all my family members. attending these cases across states in every month I felt inconvenience, applied TP at SC, Got Stay order to TS state case proceedings,
then immediately She filed CrPC MC at AP.
Means 2 cases in AP and 1 case TS.
Husband filed a TP at SC, SC served Notices to wife twice, no one is appeared, hence SC sent notice to Her Lawyer as well saying to pass to notices to your client.
but still no one is appeared in SC, Instead of make then Ex-Party , SC Dismissed the TP case.
If women file any case in India we can see immediate action in seconds?
If Husband file case SC it self gave then enough time and simply dismissed.
Where is the Justice for Men? In India Justice is obtained for only women ?
Where men can reside in India?
Is there any grounds/Bar to show if no one respondent is not appeared, SC make them as Ex-Party
Why SC is not wife as Ex-Party?
your reply would be really appreciated.
Appointment of advocate commissioner in maintenance case
husband getting rents 3lakhs above, wife wants to prove it, to get maintenance
is it maintainable to file petitioner u/o 39 rule 7