LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

jayanttelang   29 December 2008 at 21:38

Place of Jurisdiction

Dear sirs,
Can u please send me details about judgement;
Abhayraj Jain vs Glaxo India,(division bench,mumbai HC,12th/14th Aug 2008.)
one more thing,can i file a complaint at my nearby laour court/high court,(regarding my subsistence allowance.)
In my matter,domestic inquiry is going on against me(from Feb. 2008) by management, at Ahmedabad,my co.is based at Ahmedabad,my work Place is nearby Indore (MP),i m a Medical Representative,
still management paying me only 50% of my salary,mng.denied to increase my salary,
Employer has already written in my appointment letter that, for any dispute,jurisdiction will be Ahmedabad,but my financial status is not good,and i m not able to file my complaint to Labour court/High court at Ahmedabad,due to financial problem,what would i do?kindly suggest me.

kanishk   29 December 2008 at 19:46

How can i proceed futher?

There are two cases. 1) The property is owned by my grandmoms mom. she has three children including my grandmom. 2)This one is owned by my grandmom's brother, he was not maried and therefore had no children. Now both are dead and the property is not in the name of any particular person. My question is ,

1) Does my grandmom has any share in any of these property?
2) If yes, then being a girl child is there any particular ration in both the cases.

sanjeev murthy desai   29 December 2008 at 18:45

Cultivation Agreement,


Hi, all

Can I executed a cultivation agreement with land owner? what is the legal validity of section 5 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act.1961, in this regard?

sanjeev desai.

Swaroop   29 December 2008 at 14:58

IS THIS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE?

FIRSTLY I WOULD LIKE TO INRODUCE MY SELF AS A COMSUMER.
I HAD SENT A NOTICE TO A WATER PROOFING COMPANY AND THEIR AUTHORISED DEALER FOR THE DEFICIENCY IN MATERIAL AND SERVICE PROVIDED.
THIS AUTHORISED DEALER WAS INTRODUCED TO ME BY THEIR COMPANY OFFICER.

AFTER SENDING THE NOTICE I HAVE RECEIVED A REPLY FROM THE COMPANY CLAIMING THAT THE DEALER FROM WHOM THE MATERIAL WAS PURCHASED WAS NOT THEIR AUTHORISED DEALER AND THAT MY CLAIM OF THE SAME IS FALSE AND INTURN INFORMED ME THAT THEY ARE NO WAY CONNECTED TO THE ISSUE BUT TO KEEP IN CONTACT ONLY WITH THE DEALER.

BUT THE SHOPKEEPER OR DEALER HAS CLEARLY MENTIONED IN THE CASH INVOICE THAT HE IS THE AUTHORISED DEALER FOR THEIR COMPANY'S PRODUCTS.
BUT THE SAME IS NOT ACCEPTED BY THE COMPANY. HOW WOULD THIS BE USEFUL TO ME TO FILE A COMPALAINT IN THE CONSUMER COURT AGAINST THE COMPNAY AND THE DEALER.
UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES CAN I HOLD THEM RESPOSIBLE BECAUSE THEY ARE MISLEADING THE CONSUMERS LIKE ME.
CAN I ALSO FILE A CRIMINAL CASE FOR CHEATING?
KINDLY CONFIRM.

Swaroop   29 December 2008 at 14:52

COMNPANY'S CLAIMS.

FIRSTLY I WOULD LIKE TO INRODUCE MY SELF AS COMSUMER.
I HAD SENT A NOTICE TO A WATER PROOFING COMPANY AND THEIR AUTHORISED DEALER FOR THE DEFICIENCY IN MATERIAL AND SERVICE PROVIDED.
THIS AUTHORISED DEALER WAS INTRODUCED TO ME BY THEIR COMPANY OFFICER.

AFTER SENDING THE NOTICE I HAVE RECEIVED A REPLY FROM THE COMPANY CLAIMING THAT THE DEALER FROM WHOM THE MATERIAL WAS PURCHASED WAS NOT THEIR AUTHORISED DEALER AND THAT MY CLAIM OF THE SAME IS FALSE.

BUT THE SHOPKEEPER OR DEALER HAS CLEARLY MENTIONED IN THE CASH INVOICE THAT HE IS THE AUTHORISED DEALER FOR THEIR COMPANY'S PRODUCTS.
BUT THE SAME IS NOT ACCEPTED BY THE COMPANY. HOW WOULD THIS BE USEFUL TO ME TO FILE A COMPALAINT IN THE CONSUMER COURT AGAINST THE COMPNAY AND THE DEALER.
UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES CAN I HOLD THEM RESPOSIBLE BECAUSE THEY ARE MISLEADING THE CONSUMERS LIKE ME.
CAN I ALSO FILE A CRIMINAL CASE FOR CHEATING?
KINDLY CONFIRM.

mintu   29 December 2008 at 14:13

action against Trade union

Respected sir

Some employees of my client company went on unauthorised leave.Post of the employees are Executive - market operation. They did online sharing trading for my client company. My client company is a registered share borker. Said employees of my client company went on unauthorised leave. We issued a joint request letter, requesting them to join their duties. Now we have received a notice from a trade union threatening to raise "industrial dispute" claiming the termination/ dismissal of their services. It is pertinent to metion here that my client company neither recognised any trade union within the comany nor a single employee including peon is member of the said trade union or any trade union. Said trade union has categorically claim the oral termination/dismissal of the services of the said employees. We have clearly / categorically requested to resume/join their duties.

Now my client company wishes to take "appropriate action" before "appropriate forum".

Ld. memebers are requested to suggest "appropriate action" and "appropriate forum".

Can I advice him to take action making responsible said trade union for interruption / disturbance the day to day business of the client company.

It is pertinet to mention here that even we don't hare received any paper showing membership of said trade union.

Hope your immediate help as the matter is very urgent.

thanks

Ram Kishan   28 December 2008 at 22:06

REMOVED THE MATERIAL FOR JOB WORK

How we should removed material with duty or without duty for job work. Please tell me the procedure for job work. What is the best way to remove material for job work.

Thanks

Devi Prasad Ruia   28 December 2008 at 21:38

Service Tax On Building Construction

Facts:The Company (C) has entered into a notarized Agreement in Deember 2006 landlord (L) for construction of a building on his land in 70 : 40 ratio. The Broad terms are as follows:

1. Ground floor as commercial and Area of 5 existing shops will be deducted from landlords share on ground floor.

2. 1st floors to 3h floor as residential flats (more than 12 units)

3. The construction of the building is being done by company by engaging daily construction workers

4. The Company will buy 1000 sq ft from Landlord @ Rs. 400- per sq. ft. and has already paid Rs. 4lacs in advance to the landlord .

5. Landlord has executed Registered power of attorney in favour of one of the Director of the Company for execution of sale deed in favour of Purchaser’s of Company’s alocation

6. The total Super structure is complete

7. So far Company has not entered into any agreement for sale and intends to use booking form for booking of flat and after full payment to execute final Sale deed in favour of would be purchaser.

Queries
LANDLORD’S Allocation
1. Whether any Service tax is payable against the landlord allocation
2. under which section
3. Rate of ST
4. Quantum of ST
5. Date of Payment of Such ST


DEVELOPER’S Allocation
1. Whether any Service tax is payable against the Company’s allocation & Purchase of 1000 sq ft. by Company from Landlords Allocation
2. under which section
3. Rate of ST
4. Quantum of ST
5. Date of Payment of Such ST


G.G.Shaikh Advocate M:9898038990   28 December 2008 at 20:35

about NI act.

cheque was bounced and complainant filed comlplain against the brother of drawer instead of drawer because of that accused borrowed money from complainant.

please give me any citetion in fevour of accused.

there is nothing like any written undertaking between the complainant and the drawer of the cheque that he is issuing cheque in discharge of his bother's debt.

samudra   28 December 2008 at 17:39

Mutation--Non co-operation of Family member ,half way?

Family member"X" agrees for a settlement with "Y". As per agreed terms the "Y", applied for the Mutation. During the process"X", retracted/ not co-operating for the process to continue. On the request of "Y", the Revenue Authorities to served a notice on "X". The following reply is given by "X":

(This reply is given by "X", One day prior to due date of Hearing)

"With reference to your above referred notice on the basis of alleged claim for succession by"Y".I am to state that the application of "Y",if any,filed by her is not sent along with notice to enable me to give a reply. You are supposed to send a copy of her claim petition along with notice. In the schedule typed in the notice, the basis of the claim is not mentioned.

We request you to give a copy of petition to enable us to reply.

Thanking you Yours faithfully,

sd/- by"Z"***
( "X") "
*** Note: Here the letter is sighed by, Son of "X".
********* ****** ******* *****


Under above condition, what should be the action, to be taken by "Y"/Revenue Authorities?

Kindly Member of Lawyer forum,with Revenue Knowledge to help me in the matter please.: