ARVIND JAIN
15 October 2008 at 11:20
MAHARASHTRA GOVT HAS DECIDED TO AMEND 125 CR.P.C TO INCLUDE WOMEN IN LIVI IN RELATIONSHIP.DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT HAS ALREADY PROVIDED PROTECTION TO SUCH WOMEN. NOW MY QUESTION IS CAN WE LEGALISE SUCH RELATIONSHIP AS MARRIAGE AND WHAT ARE THE COSEQUENCES OF LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP IN CASE OF LEGITIMACY, SUCCESSUION ETC ????????????????
venkat reddy
15 October 2008 at 07:32
what are the jurisdictions to file a case, i heard that on advocates address also we can take as jurisdiction.please let me know.
venkat
Nishant Singla
15 October 2008 at 07:06
A person filed a complaint about my father's tenure was that he(father) had done some misappropriation during his tenure. Of which he made some about 11 allegations. Of which only 3 allegation are approved by the Block Officers in enquiry as because of clerical mistakes and due to some other reasons. Meanwhile he published some defamatory matter in 2 newspapers by 5 times.With complaint he filed his affidevit too (in which he had mentioned that if any of the above stated fact prove wrong than i am liable to be prosecuted u/s 182 of IPC).After getting the notice we already submitted 96301rs.in the govt. fund.. Is our deafamtion case is maintable as per 499,500,501 of IPC. Because he published defamatory matters in newspapers in between the inquiry in which he alleged for the duping of 63lakhs on my father. Can we succeed in filing the def. case against him on the account of other 8 allegation which remains false in the enquiry.(Note-The complainant was also a Punch during the tenure of my father as a surpunch, and in the early 2 years he had signed the proceeding book before the whole panchayat. Proceeding book is that record of which he made the complaint.In some matters he signed the regulations of which he now made complaint)
Ladhu Ram Chowdhary
15 October 2008 at 07:00
Cr.P.C.(2 of 1974),Ss. 190(1)(b),319-congnizance of offence -Attack on house of informant by 7 named accused persons alleged -Inmates were assaulted and jewellery box removed -FIR lodged-I.O. had submitted charge sheet only against two accused,investigation shown as pending against other two and three accused were exonerated-Howrver,CJM took cognizance on finding of prima facia material against exonerated petitioners also under S.190(1)Cr.P.C.-CJM can debarred from taking cognizance of offence on basis of material placed before him ?
N.K.Assumi
15 October 2008 at 06:36
If the Government direct the Prosecutor to withdraw the case against the accused contrary to the opinion of the Prosecutor under section 321 of the CrPc,and the prosecutor is compelled to withdraw the case against the accused by the State, what should the prosecutor do in such a case? To withdraw the case his judicial conscience does not permit him to do, in such a case what is best for the Prosecutor.
N.K.Assumi
15 October 2008 at 06:29
Dear Members, can any one of you tell me the name of the prisoner and the Country who was detained for 32 years under security detention act of the State without trial?
Tanx in advance.
J.Satyamurthy
14 October 2008 at 21:43
Sir,Facts of the case.Plaintiffs filed a suit for Suit for permanent injunction on open suit land,got contested interim injunction orderin their favour,agrieved by it defendants filed CMA,it was not seriously contested by the plaintiffs,the same is allowed.now my problem before the experts is that-Is still the suit is maintainable for commencement of trail- plz help me in regard with citations
J.Satyamurthy
14 October 2008 at 21:42
Sir,Facts of the case.Plaintiffs filed a suit for Suit for permanent injunction on open suit land,got contested interim injunction orderin their favour,agrieved by it defendants filed CMA,it was not seriously contested by the plaintiffs,the same is allowed.now my problem before the experts is that-Is still the suit is maintainable for commencement of trail- plz help me in regard with citations
Mohamed Ali
14 October 2008 at 21:36
A muslim partition suit was decreed in name of 6 Sons as defendants and 5 Daughters as plaintiffs, As per decree sons are entitle for 2/17th share and daughters are entitle for 1/17th share..
While filing FDP all the original defendants and plaintiffs were dead as this a very long pending suite,
Hence all their LR's had to be brought on record to represent them in FDP.
In one 3rd plaintiff's(Died in 1978) case who is a daughter,
She had 3 children 1 son(died in 1974) and 2 daughters, Son had predeceased her mother (hence he is not entitle for share as per Mohameddan law)..
But by mistake or purpose, The predeceased sons heirs were brought on record while filing of FDP.. As per LAW they are misjoinders, As their father( is a predeceased son of 3rd plaintiff) and is not entitle for any share in the 3rd plaintiff share of property.
FDP is still pending, As per decree my great grandmother is entitle for 1/17 share, while filing of FDP they have brought on record heirs of this predeceased son as LR's (misjoinders) along with their 2 aunts,
Since FDP is to allot 1/17th share for my Great grandmother in that only two daughters of Original 3rd plaintiff are entitle for share.
Point to be noted: These predeceased son's children were brought on record, while filing of FDP in 1984, where as preliminary decree was passed in 1970, since the original 3rd plaintiff had died(in 1978) and her son died in 1974.
In muslim law birth right is not recognised(where Hindu law recognises birth right), hence question who are the LR's entitle for share in 3rd plaintiff 1/17th share will come up only after her death, Since her son had predeceased her,
Only 2 daughters of 3rd plaintiff are entitle for share not childrens of predeceased son... this is our IA.
question: 1) FDP is still pending, Will the court executing decree will delete these misjoinders in FDP proceedings itself, as per Rule 10(2) and sec 47. or we have to file a seperate suite after FDP...
2) In the court in which FDP is pending, our IA to remove this misjoinders is pending from past 6 months, our IA is not yet been allowed or rejected, we are frustrated due to this delay,
can we file a writ petition in High court by passing this lower court to delete this misjoinders...
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
retainership agreement
sir
can anyone provide a copy of retainership agreement, a model draft for hiring someone as retainer.