TS Bhatia
14 October 2008 at 12:41
What is the legal formality for making retrenchment of workers in factory ?
TS Bhatia
14 October 2008 at 12:37
what are services for which service tax is to be paid ?
SACHIN DHARMENDRAKUMAR JAIN
14 October 2008 at 11:52
Dear All,
I have joined Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL) as an officer in Grade A (as a CA). I need to execute a bond of Rs. 1 lac if I leave the service of IOCL before the expiry of 3 years. I have left IOCL after working for 65 days.
The Co. has sent me a legal notice asking me to pay bond money otherwise, the will go for criminal/civil proceedings against me.
Please help me out whether employment bond are valid. (with supportive case laws, if any) Further, what should I do to avoid harrassment and unnecessary tention.
I would be very thankful if anyone from this community can help me out.
Regards,
Sachin D jain.
Senguttuvan K
14 October 2008 at 08:57
FBT is not a tax on Income
FBT is a tax on expenses
Is FBT applicable when some one is not claiming those expenses at all?
Two scenarios:
01. When a company's total income is exempted, the company can prepare memo of Income by disallowing the expenses subject to FBT and arrive at profit / loss. Suich profit is escalated to the extent of expenses subject to FBT. However, the profit is not taxable, since exempted.
02. When a company's Carry Forward Loss is huge and by not claming expenses subject to FBT the profit can be arrived.
Since this action doesn't have any impact on Book Profit, the status of MAT liability may not undergo any alteration.
Please clarify
Nishant Singla
14 October 2008 at 07:52
My father was elected as surpunch of Chhachhrauli village in 2001 by 375 winning votes. Since then one of punch of my village with jealous always try to tending down my father image in village by making false issues against my father. Recently he got the photocopies of our records of panchayat term from 2001 to 2006 and made a complaint to D.C. yamuna nagar, of course the I.O. find a clerical mistake and fined us with rs. 96301.Therefore we submit this money to Panchayat fund and then inform to I.O.. But due to jealous the complainant publish some defamatory news in newspaper by 5 days. Besides, this he (the complainant) was also a punch in our tenure and he had signed in the Proceeding Books of which he made complaint to D.C. So, i want to know , can i file a PIL against him in Punjab & haryana high court to restraint him from making further complaint because he has already signed the proceeding book for some issues of which he make complaint to D.C.. of our district.
From: Nishant Singla
Town-chhachhrauli
Distt- Yamuna Nagar
State- Haryana.
Ph no- 09354519053
email id-nishant_etp4@rediffmail.com
Mohamed Ali
13 October 2008 at 21:28
A muslim partition suit was decreed in name of 6 Sons as defendants and 5 Daughters as plaintiffs, As per decree sons are entitle for 2/17th share and daughters are entitle for 1/17th share..
While filing FDP all the original defendants and plaintiffs were dead as this a very long pending suite,
Hence all their LR's had to be brought on record to represent them in FDP.
In one 3rd plaintiff's case who is a daughter,
She had 3 children 1 son and 2 daughters, Son had predeceased her mother (hence he is not entitle for share as per Mohameddan law)..
But by mistake or purpose, The predeceased sons heirs were brought on record while filing of FDP.. As per LAW they are misjoinders, As their father(predeceased son of 3rd plaintiff) was not entitle for any share in the 3rd plaintiff Property.
FDP is still pending, As per decree my great grandmother is entitle for 1/17 share, while filing of FDP they have brought on record heirs of this predeceased son as LR's (misjoinders) along with their 2 aunts as the son(died in 1974) had predeceased, of original 3rd plaintiff, Since FDP is to allot 1/17th share for my Great grandmother in that only two daughters of Original 3rd plaintiff are entitle for share.
Point to be noted: These predeceased son's children were brought on record, while filing FDP in 1984, where as preliminary decree was passed in 1970, since the original 3rd plaintiff had died(1978) at the time,
In muslim law birth right is not recognised(where Hindu law recognises birth right), hence this issue of predeceased son will come up only after the death of Share holder ie 3rd plaintiff(1/17th share holder as per decree)
question: 1) FDP is still pending, Will the court executing decree will delete these misjoinders in FDP proceedings itself, as per Rule 10(2) and sec 47. or we have to file a seperate suite after FDP...
2) Since court in which FDP is pending is delaying on argument of our application, can we file a writ petition in High court to delete this misjoinders...
A.R.KUPPUSAMI
13 October 2008 at 20:19
Please give a case wise explanation:
Case No:1) If a Company covered w.e.f. retrospective date, the payment of E.P.F dues assessed for the whole period and submitted along with EPF coverage application- The Company is covered from the date as assumed in the application- Is the Company is liable to pay the penal damages and interest from the date of coverage even the payment made at the time of filing coverage application?
Case No:2)While forwarding the coverage details to the Company- Normally the EPF Officials fill the Coverage memo and advice to remit the contribution within a stipulated time limit- The above case covered retrospectively for instance one year before the date of filing coverage application- The Company remits the EPF dues within the stipulated period/or not remitted the contribution within the stipulated time limit and make a delayed payment like 90 days- Is there any Policy or Act to compute and remit the Damages and Interest from the date of coverage or
from the date advised in the Coverage memo
under what basis? accordance with law, Para 32A has given a schedule of rate of damages for delayed days- is the damages and interest is applicable for the pre-discovery period(Pre-discovery period means: The date of retrospective coverage to the date of advise sent to the Company)
Case No:3) In accordance with EPF Act Para 32A, clearly denotes that the recovery of damages for default in payment of any contribution, may recover from the employer as below:
Less than 2 months 17% per annum
Two months and ^ but
less than 4 months 22% ---do---
like wise, Is there any provision or discretionary power to the EPF Officials to compute less than 17% even the time limit exceeds 120 days?
Expecting a favourable reply from the experts.
with regards
A.R.KUPPUSAMI
Rekha.....
13 October 2008 at 18:36
HellO!
Pl. would u furnish me the soft copy of the following authority
AIR 1996 pgno130 (Gujarat)
KANTIBHAI VALABHAI PATEL V/S PRAVIN NATHUBHAI
Rekha.....
13 October 2008 at 18:32
Dear Sir, M’m
Good Evening
How to issue summon under sec 138(NIA)
The fact of the matter is that our client received cheque of Rs.3,00,000 from the party. The cheque was dishonored by the bank and having endorsement that account is closed. At the time of issuing the cheque, the account was not closed but at the time of depositing the said cheque with the bank the party’s account was closed. Now party is not traceable. The party left the town. We inquired about his whereabouts but address is found but he is not living there. PlZ. let me know how V should proceed further.
If it is convenient to u pl. inform us immediately.
Thanx
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Continuation- summon to be issued U/S. 138 NIA
dear Sir/M'm
Good Evening
With all due respect sir V would like to inform u further that The Said Party has already sold his property, factory.
It is foolish question to u bt V need to ask u plz sir,
What V certainly need to know that the summon or warrant will be issued will, return without serving .is there any concrete way to be taken in this matter. How our client will receive the Rs.300000 without service of summons or warrant and also if party is not going to appear before the Hon'ble Court.
Thanx that u all r giving ur valuable time 4 us.