LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

naresh   18 July 2008 at 15:37

seeks advice and judgement on accquittal

respected experts. the case is iam running a institute for last 30 years which was registered under socitey regestration act it is a private body we have taken NOC From govt also we conduct a examination of 10TH AND 12 CLASS like u heard HINDI SATIYA SAMELN PRAYG & RAST BHASA PRASAD VERDHA like this we given certificate to students who appear in our examination still our institution is not regognized from any govt deparments but thousand of student get govt job or like settle her and there we were in tuch with govt deppt for recognization and time to govt deppt has inspected our institute and lot ofcorrespondence between govt and us but some time mosetly we face problem if a student not get any admission in college or 11th after getting certificate of our institute they lodge FIR U/S 420, 468.471 ETC police does not under stand our documents we say if the institution is not regognized it doesnot mean certificate is fake fake means if we given some other institue certificate but they compare us with C.B.S.E. ur not affilated with C.B.S.E. WE SAYS CBSE IS ALSO A UTONOMISE BODY why we take affilation from cbse and he has no power pls tell any judgementsimilar to my metter and advice how we stom criminal activity to harash us we never write in our admission form we r recognized even student also before filp fourm knowas very well
harish kumar and ors

naresh   18 July 2008 at 15:36

seeks advice and judgement on accutial

respected experts. the case is iam running a institute for last 30 years which was registered under socitey regestration act it is a private body we have taken NOC From govt also we conduct a examination of 10TH AND 12 CLASS like u heard HINDI SATIYA SAMELN PRAYG & RAST BHASA PRASAD VERDHA like this we given certificate to students who appear in our examination still our institution is not regognized from any govt deparments but thousand of student get govt job or like settle her and there we were in tuch with govt deppt for recognization and time to govt deppt has inspected our institute and lot ofcorrespondence between govt and us but some time mosetly we face problem if a student not get any admission in college or 11th after getting certificate of our institute they lodge FIR U/S 420, 468.471 ETC police does not under stand our documents we say if the institution is not regognized it doesnot mean certificate is fake fake means if we given some other institue certificate but they compare us with C.B.S.E. ur not affilated with C.B.S.E. WE SAYS CBSE IS ALSO A UTONOMISE BODY why we take affilation from cbse and he has no power pls tell any judgementsimilar to my metter and advice how we stom criminal activity to harash us we never write in our admission form we r recognized even student also before filp fourm knowas very well
harish kumar and ors

naresh   18 July 2008 at 14:56

seeks advice and judgement

respected all the expertas

i have file criminal complainat under section 420 and 406 in place of N.I Act for cheque Bounce whether the complaint is maintanabel pls suggest any judgement which support that a criminal complaint under 420 and 406 is maintanabel against cheque bounced

thanks in advances

harish

Anil Kumar kamboj Delhi M-9650   18 July 2008 at 12:00

can before partion a coprtioner sold their immoveable property

sive photo came from form me jake
fir avtar ko uplode kare


anil kumar advocate per click karne se swami ji ki photo ayagi

tcy likhne per gmail ke points per jhha more lika he whaha se site per click karne se tcy liknye
fir aygi learn english etc.
tcy
me law ke questionke leye
featured , latest most popular me jaye


legal question if jete to site per name will be shown
ke leye jany
about us me
fir law option per click kren

PARADYGMLAW.COM ONLINE MOCK TEST FOR LAW


MY GROUP ME jake apne group me jany


vocablaory group also membershiship of me

learnenglish.com v.v.i.m.p site

english test ke liye

http://www.bmconsultantsindia.com/register.asp

vocablory group he mera ..... my group me jake


chalengers he esme........
http://www.tcyonline.com/LetUsChallenge/check_alert.php?step=2&picture=dthirdone&chlng_id=8659&tid=1068&msg=


current affair ke laye de bak po dena

judiciary ke liay.........

http://www.tcyonline.com/law/

1. news archive...........111111111 august 2008
me her type ke news gk se relsted
2. For question and answer relating to any
course ,book prepration how to manage your
stertagy for exams for servicesetc.

http://www.tcyonline.com/beta/index.php


20AUG ME
..... NOKRI .COM ME LOGIN HO KAR CLICK LIVE PERSON PER CAREER CHAT KE LIYE......


OBC Reservations - Supreme Court Verdict « The Great Indian Mutiny Says:

March 29, 2007 at 8:10 pm

[...] I personally see this as being a good thing in the light of the recent developments. This means that govt will have to first do a study to identify the OBCs and then come up with a proposal. Such a thing is absolutely necessary for a program of this magnitude. As in the past the legislature could have legislated against such a decision and put it in the ninth schedule. But the supreme court recently ruled that anything placed in the ninth schedule is also subject to review. [...]

OBC Reservations - Supreme Court Verdict « Polite Indian Says:
March 30, 2007 at 4:56 am
[...] violent?Piyush on AboutOBC Reservations - Supreme Court Verdict « The Great Indian Mutiny on Ninth Schedule VerdictPolite Indian on Is Islam violent?Polite Indian on Is Islam violent?Polite Indian on Uniform Civil [...]


Students - (20) (kesme he )SHARE YOUR files me......
About law courses, colleges, subjects, exams etc



NOTICE BY ADVOCATE CLAIMING DAMAGES FOR DEFAMATION

...................................
...................................
Date ............................

TO,
Shri ..........................
Editor and Publisher
................................
................................
................................

Dear Sir,

Under instructions from my client Shri A, etc. of ..................... I hereby state as under:

In your newspaper ....................... of the ............ 19 ...... you have published an article .......................... in which you have made the following defamatory remarks about the said Shri A.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)

The said Shri ....................... is a respectable man of the society.

The remarks made in the newspaper about the said Shri ................ are false, baseless, highly defamatory of the said Shri ...................... and made with the intention to defame the said Shri ..................... and the said Shri ....................... has suffered in his reputation and has been lowered in the estimation of his friends and the general public.

I hereby give you notice to pay a sum of Rs. ....................... to the said Shri A as damages and publish an unqualified apology prominently in your newspaper within ....................... days from the receipt of this notice.


I hereby give you notice that if you fail to comply with this notice, I will initiate legal proceedings either to prosecute you in a criminal court for defamation or to sue you

SANJAY DIXIT   18 July 2008 at 10:02

Deduction U/s 24 I.T. Act

My friend has taken a loan jointly with his wife to buy a house property. Basically the loan is sanctioned on my friend's salary and repaying capacity only. EMI is Rs. 17,000/- Whereas my friend's wife salary is Rs.14,800/- only.
My friend has registered the house property in his wife's name only.
In this circumstance whether my friend can claim Interest on salary u/s 24 and deduction u/s 80C for the principal portion paid from his salary income.
Please suggest.

Subrahmanyam   18 July 2008 at 09:34

Can I pursue LLB through Correspondence

Hi,

Can anyone please tell me if I can study LLB through correspondence. If so please provide the details. I only wish to gain Knowledge & Degree and not to practice.

Thank u,
Subrahmanyam

Rajalaxmi Dei   18 July 2008 at 08:56

payment by cheque a valid discharge of obligation or not?

I trade in the stock market through a broker. The broker has allowed me margin trading facility aginst my existing shares. I bought some future contracts in January 2008. As the market moved against me I kept on meeting the Marked to Market(MTM) losses by selling some shares from my portfolio. On 21/22.01.2008 there was sharp fall in the stock market. Hence, instead of selling shares from my portfolio, I paid the MTM losses by way of cheque to my broker 22.01.2008 morning. But the broker squared off my future positions at heavy loss to me; and to adjust this loss he sold off all the shares in my portfolio thereby causing me a loss of about Rs.8-10 lacs.
The point is whether the broker has the right to square off my positions without my knowledge when I have already paid my dues (by cheque). I consider this unethical/unlawful and lodged my protest with all concerned ( SEBI, NSE, Broker). NSE have not found anything wrong in the action of the broker and have advised me to go for Arbitration if I am not satisfied with their findings.
I seek advice from any/all learned friends on my future course of action.

Joydip Mukherjee   18 July 2008 at 00:29

498A IPC Jurisdiction

Is there any recent ruling by SC regarding lodging of complaint Us 498A/406 IPC the matrimonial home jurisdiction would be considered for filing complaint,not the parental home jurisdiction?if any then let me know the details quoting the ruling please.

KamalNayanSaxena   17 July 2008 at 23:14

Sec.138, NI Act complainant not required to appear in the court

I understand that recently a judgement is delivered by Supreme Court holding that complainant is not required to appear in the court if vakalatnama has been filed on his behalf.

Pl. provide the said citation.

Anil Chaudary   17 July 2008 at 22:49

Date of Agreement

suppose if there is an agreement duly stamped, the agreement date is 10 jan 2008, & the stamping date is 15 jan 2008 & the person who has signed the agreement has also mentioned a date below his signature which is 10 of February 2008,

now in this case is the agreement Valid?