dear sir, i had issued a cheque of ruppes 2700/- to the telecom service provider reliance on 7th sept. 2007(post dated 28/7/2007) as i was not having fund but the collector reqested to issue the cheque and will not be presented without consent.but the same was presented and get retuned as the fund i was expecting did not got.after they send me legal notice in october 2007and in december their collector executive aprroched me and taken a cash of Rs.540/- (cash recept is there)withpromise to give instalment proposal for the amount due. After that day i contacted many times relince office neither the amount paid by me shown in their subsiquent bill nor any praposl send to me.NOw the co. sued me under 138.please advise me what to do?
please also advise if a post dated cheque is issued in anpticipation of fund and if fund does not arrive in future , here no intention to fraud then why it is criminal. as post dated cheque are taken by finnacial institution and banks, ASfuture can,t be granted ther may some problem in general public life in future
I have completed my graduation in automobile engg. and want to pursue law {arbitration and insurance).pls help with institutes and eligibility.
The refugee rehabilitation department alloted a land to a person and latter handed over the deed to that person. It was also informed that the person can sell the land at his discretion. If that person wants to make a will depriving one of his sons will it be valid in the eye of law? The depriving son's view is that the land was given by the Govt. to a person for maintaining his family. So one can not deprive a member of that family. Is it tenable?
Pradyot Biswas
R/Members I want to know who is competent to get custody of a major above 18 yrs.girl who previously eloped with her boyfriend and a FIR was got registered against the boy for the commission of offences uss 366/376 IPC later girl and boy both surrendered in the court.Boy is also Major.Court ordered for judicial custody of boy and girl was sent to NARI NIKETAN.Girl is still fevouring the boy and wants to marry with him.I want to know whether Parents can get her custody against her wish.I further want to know how girl can be released from the Nari Niketan.Who is competent to got her custody except her parents?whether court can release her from Nari Niketan merely on her wish as she is major and she is denying all allegation against her boyfriend.
Pls any one tell me about SARFAESI Act and legal document for the same (Enforcement, Resolution & Recovery)..
Do the neeedful as soon as possible...
At what age the custody of children goes to father.
can somebody explain me what is the difference between the settlement deed and the gift deed. should settlement deed entered only between the family members. what is the stamp duty for settlement deed and gift deed in Tamil Nadu
Suppose that there's a tv channel which buys the right to telecast a movie say twice in a year for three years and pays the entire amount in the first yer say Rs. 3,00,000....
Will this entire amount be allowed in the year of payment if the tv channel follows accrual system of accounting???
Kindly support will relevant sections & case studies...
Respected Dear Sir(s),
We hv following query. We request your Valuable review on this.
The assessee is paying service tax on goods transportation by road freight....as a service receipient.
The assessee has availed credit of ST paid by it on Advertisement Exp. and have utilised the same for paying service tax on freight, payable by it as a receipient of service.
The assessee has done so upto 1st March, 2008, under bona fide assumption that, it is a "deemed service provider" and therefore can take credit and utilise the same for payment of service tax on frieght.
Sir, Will u please guide us as to
1. Whether such a credit can be availed and utilised by the Service Receiptient for Payment of Service Tax on Freight ?
2. Which are the sections/provisions/rules under which the assessee is eligible OR not eligible to availe and utilise such credit ?
Thanking You.
Awaiting a reply.
Evidence Act
Can Some one explain me is there a peovision in the evidence act which says that a 30 year old document is presumed to be valid and it cannot be challenged before the court of law as not being conclusive proof.