meenu katuria
24 October 2009 at 18:06
When challenging a quashing order of the High Court in the Supreme Court of India, what will be the correct term - overturning the quashing order or setting aside of the quashing order or something else?
Naman Joshi
Ist Year,
Law Student
Rajesh Kumar
24 October 2009 at 17:40
i hv filed a bounce chq case of 75000 and till date my lawyer has taken 15000 rs as his charges. can i claim this amount in my case with 75000. pls help me to know about this because 15000 seems to be very high agst case of 75000. what to do i am not able to understand. pls help someone
Anonymous
24 October 2009 at 16:20
hi friend
i am facing a some problem in filing my case please help me
i purchased a battery from local shopkeeper he deliver me defective piece and many argument he denies to replace or refund my money rs 8000
now i have decided to teach him a lesson
i have prepare case paper but i have little confusion in deciding compensation amount and further processor. i donot know there is need of notary or not. but i know the fees will be rs100
please help me
Anonymous
24 October 2009 at 14:40
Sir,
We have filed an application u/s 13B for divorce and subsequently wehave also submited a application for waiver of statuatory period also.It seems there is a new SC order which makes mandatory to undergo the 6 months statuatory period.If so before 6 months can we again move an application for waiver of the statuatory period Kindly suggest
Sunlawseeker
24 October 2009 at 13:40
Hai !
My State : Tamil Nadu
Query : My friend is working with Tamil Nadu Government Judiciary department.
He is a physically handicapped person. He received a message from his superior regarding deduction of professional tax from his salary this year but, not like that previous years.
Can anybody let me know that is there any provision regarding exemption of professional tax for physically handicapped?
awaiting reply.
regards
V.Sundaresan
Mohamed Ali
24 October 2009 at 11:15
We have a Muslim partition suite pending in Final decree proceedings and is adjourned for 31st of this month, for which preleminary dated almost 1970..
We are LR's of one plaintiff, plaintiff had 3 children two daughters and one son who had predeceased her, but his childrens were wrongly brought on record while filing final decree petition in the year 1989,
plaintiff daughter has filed an Interlocutary application in 2008 to strike out these LR's of predeceased sons children from record as they are not entitle fo share as per Mohameddan law.
Also, In this Final decree proceddings there are 3 non-bonafide subsequent purcahser who has some how been made as parties as additional defendants,
And one of the purchaser has done out of court compromise with some of decree holders except one plaintiff for one of the decree schedule property against the will of lR's of one plaintiff who has objected saying that First the Interlocutary application to strike out LR's of plaintiff who are not entitle for share must be disposed off as there is problem amongs LR"s of one plaintiff must be settled,then any compromise will be entertained by the objecting LR's of plaintiff.
The Honorable court agreed to dispose of our IA to strike out LR's of plaintiff who are not entitle for share and posted our I.A for Orders two hearing back, Now after 2 hearings suddenly Judge is taking a
U-turn and not writing Order on our I.A , further saying he will refer the case to Lokadalat if the parties agreed and try for compromise with subsequent non-bonafide purchasers with out disposing our IA, As per the Judge, as of now tour IA will be kept as it is.., As one of the non-bonafide purchaser is an influential person may be Judge under some influence acting this way,
We are very frustrated, our simple I.A is pending from past 2 years we being Plaintiff , our I.A is not entertained and dispose off, the Judge is more interested in compromising the non-bonafide subsequent purchaser who has no equity as per decree.
We are fed up with this trial court judges atittudes, Can we approach high court as our IA is pending from almost 2 years.
Dhanesh
24 October 2009 at 10:48
Dear Experts
I am being cheated by two companies. one is my own bank and other is that company with which i have my demat account.
I issue a cheque to India Infoline Ltd. (IIL) of Rs.5000/- to give credit to my Demat account on 09/07/2009 from my saving account in Axis Bank. The said cheque was passed from my SB account on 11/07/2009 and the amount was debited. But IIL people are saying that they not received the credit.
Now what should i do?
Dhanesh
Anonymous
24 October 2009 at 10:39
I am having a registered will in my name given to me by my grandmother who is a co-owner of the property, I am currently in possession of. Both my grandmother and grandfather, the property owners have died . My father and and his brother are fighting a case in court over the succession. What is the best thing to do for me in this situation. The registered will in my name is the last testament of one of the co-owners of the property.
Dhanesh
24 October 2009 at 10:39
Dear Experts
I am cheated by two companies. one is my own bank and other is that company with which i have my demat account.
I issue a cheque to India Infoline Ltd. (IIL) of Rs.5000/- to give credit to my Demat account on 09/07/2009 from my saving account in Axis Bank. The said cheque was passed from my SB account on 11/07/2009 and the amount was debited. But IIL people are saying that they not received the credit.
now what should i do?
Dhanesh
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
only son law
1 )My great grand father died in 1950. my grand father died in 1992 he was only son of My great grand father. My father was born in 1943 and he died in 2003 he was only son of My grand father. my father have three sister all married before 1970. I have one younger brother and my mother.
my grand father died in 1992 I came know 2005 act does not apply. Because he died prior to 2005 act.
2) my father being born prior to 1956 act he was only son of my grand father and my grand father was only son of My great grand father. I came to know that there is only son law by which my father get all of my grand father share or half of my grand father share another half divided among all his heirs. I want to know which is correct and from ware I can get to know only son law and any citation which I can get.
Please help me.